The SuperCDMS Experiment and the Search for Dark Matter.

It was back in my undergraduate days (early 1980s) that the topic of Dark Matter first began to be seriously considered by astro-physicists and cosmologists. The idea that there was some kind of matter in the Universe that was for some reason invisible to our telescopes was considered as a solution to two of the biggest problems in our study of the Universe.

The first problem concerned the stability of all of the rotating spiral galaxies we were studying. The idea that the stars in the outer reaches of a galaxy, like our own sun, would orbit around the center of the galaxy made perfect sense. After all, it was just Newton’s laws of gravity at work we thought. However, when we estimated the mass a galaxy, basically counting the numbers of stars, and measured the speed at which the stars were orbiting we found that there wasn’t enough mass, the galaxies should fly apart! There had to be some mass that we weren’t seeing, some invisible matter whose gravitational attraction was holding galaxies together. See image below.

Spiral Galaxy Rotation (Credit: Giphy)

At the same time other astronomers were studying the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the leftover radiation from the original big bang, and used that data to calculate how the Universe should look today. Problem was that the calculations didn’t match the reality, not based on the amount of mass we could see. In order to make the calculations work the Universe had to have about four times as much invisible matter as the matter we could see.

O’k so the Universe had a lot of matter that didn’t emit light the way normal matter did in the stars, some sort of Dark Matter. The search was on to discover just what this Dark Matter was. The astro-physicists, with some help from the high-energy physicists, came up with a lot of ideas: Cold Dark Matter, Hot Dark Matter, MACHOS (Mass Concentrations) and WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).

That was almost forty years ago now, and we’re still waiting for direct experimental evidence of any kind of dark matter. Oh, we’ve made some progress, everybody pretty much agrees on WIMPs as Dark matter but that doesn’t mean everybody’s right. We need good hard evidence.

Hopefully soon we’ll get some from the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search now under construction by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) at Stanford University and which will be set up over 2000 meters underground at SNOLAB at the Vale Inco Mine in Sudbury, Canada.

Setting up sophisticated, delicate physics experiments deep down in an old mine because all of the rock above the instruments helps insulate them from the interference of cosmic ray particles. And the SuperCDMS needs to eliminate all of the interference it can, it’s trying to measure the tiny amount of energy produced when a WIMP bounces against a normal atom. The image below shows the Sudbury neutrino telescope already in operation at Sudbury.

Neutrino Telescope in Sudbury Mine (Credit: Pinterest)

Physicists calculate that such collisions are very rare, you may have to wait many trillions of trillions of years for a particular atom to experience such a collision. Rather than waiting so long physicists will use trillion of trillions of atoms and then ‘listen’, that’s right listen for the sound of any collisions. Technically the intent is to detect the minute phonon signals of the collisions with germanium crystal detectors. The image below shows one of SuperCDMS’s detectors.

SuperCDMS Detector (Credit: SuperCDMS)

But in order to ‘hear’ the sound of a WIMP hitting an atom the physicists have to eliminate as much as possible the racket caused by all of the atoms hitting each other caused by thermal vibrations and the only way to do that is to reduce the detector’s temperature down to a small fraction of a degree above absolute zero, hence Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search.

The experimental setup is shown in the image below. The cyrostat and detector section is modular in design allowing more detectors to be installed in the future. Around the detectors is a lining of lead (Pb) shielding with water shielding around that. The entire apparatus is then mounted on seismic isolators because even the slightest outside movement could be picked up as an erroneous signal. It’s often true that in today’s physics experiments, eliminating the unwanted signals can be a bigger job than detecting the minuscule signal you’re looking for!

SuperCDMS Experimental Layout (Credit: SuperCDMS)

SuperCDMS is scheduled to be up and running by the year 2020 but it will take four or five years of data collection before any results can be announced but I’ll let you in on my opinion. Now I’ll be very happy to be proven wrong but I’ve always been skeptical of WIMPs, we’ve been looking for them for forty years and have no evidence so far. Personally I was a MACHO supporter, basically the idea here was that for every star we can see there would be dozens of smaller brown dwarfs, objects just too small to start nuclear fusion and so don’t glow, and on top of that there would be literally thousands of planetary sized objects in interstellar space. I still think we need to consider MACHOS as a possible solution to the Dark Matter problem.

38 thoughts on “The SuperCDMS Experiment and the Search for Dark Matter.”

  1. Currently it looks like WordPress is the preferred blogging platform out
    there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your
    blog?

  2. I think the admin of this site is actally working hard
    for his website, for the reason that here every material
    is quality based information.

    1. Thanks for the comment. I do work very hard to keep up the quality of my posts so I’m glad to know it’s appreciated! Hope to see you come back soon!
      Bob L

  3. I just could not go away your website prior tto suggesting that I really loved
    the standard information an individual provjde
    for your visitors? Is gonna be agqin frequently in order too investigate
    cross-check new posts

  4. Thank you a lot for giving everyone an extraordinarily terrific opportunity to read articles and blog posts from this blog. It is always so awesome plus full of fun for me and my office friends to visit your site the equivalent of 3 times in 7 days to see the latest tips you will have. And indeed, I’m just always fascinated for the powerful opinions you serve. Certain two ideas in this article are clearly the best we have all had.

    1. Thanks for the comment but since I only post new articles twice a week visiting my blog three times a week might be overkill. Of course if you really want to who am I to refuse!
      Bob L

  5. I am also commenting to let you know of the fine encounter our girl developed going through your web page. She came to find lots of things, which included what it is like to possess an incredible giving mood to have other folks really easily have an understanding of several complicated topics. You actually did more than readers’ desires. I appreciate you for giving such important, healthy, edifying and even unique tips on the topic to Tanya.

  6. you’re in reality a juxt right webmaster. The site
    loading velocity iis incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any unique trick.
    Also, The contents are masterwork. you’ve performed a great task on this topic!

  7. I have learn several excellent stuff here. Certainly pice bookmarking for revisiting.

    I surprise how a lot effort you put to create
    the sort of excellent informative site.

  8. Firdst of all I would like to say great blog! I had a quick qquestion that
    I’d like to askk iff you don’t mind. I was interested to know how you center yourself and
    cear your mind before writing. I’ve had difficulty clearing my mind in getting
    my ideas out. I do enjoy writing however it just seems like the
    first 10 tto 15 minutes are lost just trying to figure out hoow to begin. Any recommendations or tips?
    Cheers!

    1. Thanks for the comment. I don’t know if I center myself so much as simply review my source material and then just start writing! Maybe I have to make changes once I know what I really want to say but it’s really best to just get started and do it!
      Bob L

  9. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thanks, However I am having difficulties with
    your RSS. I don’t know the reason why I can’t subscribe to it.
    Is there anybody having similar RSS issues? Anybody who knows the answer will
    you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  10. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything.

    Nevertheless imagine if you added some great pictures or videos to give your
    posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this website could certainly be one
    of the most beneficial in its field. Amazing blog!

    1. Thanks for the comment. I always try to include 4-5 images to my posts but videos, unless they’re really short, take to long to load and can cause problems. Just my opinion!
      Bob L

    1. Thanks for the comment but I’m not on twitter. I find 120 characters too constricting to say anything intelligent. I suppose that’s why Trump like it so much!
      Bob L

  11. I’ve been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never
    found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me.

    In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the
    web will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  12. Hi! Quick question that’s completely off topic.
    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?
    My site looks weird when viewing from my iphone. I’m trying to find a theme
    or plugin that might be able to fix this problem. If you have
    any suggestions, please share. Cheers!

    1. Thanks for the comment. Sorry but the only way I know of is just good old fashioned trial and error!
      Bob L

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *