With all of the evidence for Climate Change that’s accumulating, with all of the extreme weather that’s adversely effecting people’s lives everyday a growing number of people are now hoping that something can still be done to avert the coming climate disaster. The problem is that we are all just individuals; it so often appears as if our opinions just don’t matter to the politicians and billionaires who seem to run the world. Many of us want to see change but have no idea what we as individuals can do to make a difference.
That’s the whole purpose of ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ by Doctor Heidi A. Roop of the University of Minnesota’s Climate Adaptation Partnership. In her book Dr. Roop details one hundred actions that each and every one of us can take that will a have a positive effect on our environment. The actions described in ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ are broadly divided into ten categories:
Starting and Sustaining your Climate Action Journey
Energy Production and Transportation
Travel and Work
Food and Farming
Shopping and Consumer Choices
Actions Around the Home
Nature Based and Natural Solutions
Health and Well-Being
Civic and Community Engagement
Education and Climate Information
Each of these categories is then sub-divided into specific actions that anyone can at least attempt and in which any degree of success is a definite contribution toward the goal of mitigating Climate Change. While it maybe true that governments and corporations have a far greater influence on the Climate than any individual, if each of us begins to take a few of the actions suggested in ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ we can make a difference and in the long run those individual actions will help to force governments and corporations to take action as well.
So what are the actions outlined in ‘The Climate Action Handbook’. Well, they vary from large scale efforts such as installing solar panels on the roof of your house to such simple things as combining several car trips into one in order to cut down on CO2 emissions. Whether large or small a little bit of up front thinking and effort can reduce your own carbon footprint, and often save you some money as well. Planting trees is another example of something simple anyone can do that will take carbon out of the air, while providing shade to help cool down our cities while just giving us all a little greenery to enjoy.
Many of the actions suggested in ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ are pretty obvious once you think about it. For example did you know that a 16 oz. plastic bottle of water requires more than one thousand times as much energy to produce, package and transport as 16 oz. of tap water does! That’s actually a lot of carbon going into the air just for a quick drink, and that plastic bottle your water came in will likely just become plastic pollution as well. Another easy one is fast shipping on the items we all buy online. It’s true, not only does same day shipping cost a lot more than 3-4 days shipping does, but it also has a much bigger carbon footprint, and do you really need to have that latest Taylor Swift CD right now, you can’t wait a couple of days?
And speaking of plastic pollution many of the actions recommended in ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ also deal with the incredible amount of plastic that we simple throw away causing harm to the environment and our own health. Food waste is another issue that produces greenhouse gasses while filling up our landfills; all while many people go hungry even here in the US.
I do have a few complaints about ‘The Climate Action Handbook’, for one thing, in her effort to get to exactly 100 actions Dr. Roop has several that really overlap to a great extent. For example, Action 4: Be privy to the Politics of Climate Change has a lot in common with Action 96: Look to Community Leaders. Also, the book is formatted in a style similar to a live seminar being projected onto a screen in front of an audience. That is, each action is discussed on one page while on the page opposite what was discussed is repeated in bullet-form. Because of this there are several actions that should really be discussed at greater length while the discussion of other actions hardly manage to fill up their single page!
Nevertheless ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ is a great resource for how ordinary people can help to save our planet, and what could be more important than that! One last point, throughout ‘The Climate Action Handbook’ other resources, websites, organizations, other books are highlighted to help the reader go further, to find out more about how they can help solve the climate crisis.
The eastern Mediterranean has always been one of the hotbeds of archaeology surrounded as it is by Greece to the north, Egypt to the south and the lands of the bible to the east. Yet despite over two hundred years of intensive study the eastern Mediterranean still manages to surprise us on occasion. In this post I’ll be discussing two new discoveries that have recently been made in the eastern Mediterranean. As usual I will discuss the earliest study first and move forward in time.
We humans took to traveling on the water long before the beginning of recorded history so the story of how the first boats and ships were built can only be uncovered by archaeology. Based upon underwater excavations of ancient shipwrecks it is known that by the late Bronze Age there were ships capable of sailing hundreds of kilometers and carrying tons of cargo conducting regular trade between the people of Egypt, the Hittite empire, Canaan, Troy and Greece.
However it was always thought that those ships never sailed out of sight of land but instead hugged the coastline throughout their journeys. The reasons for this timidity are basically twofold; firstly in case of a storm a ship close to shore could quickly find a harbour or even beach itself for safety. In addition the navigators of that time probably lacked the navigational tools necessary to know where they were and what direction they were going once they were out of sight of land.
That’s what makes the recent discovery of a 3,300 year old vessel that had sunk about 90 kilometers off the coast of northern Israel so interesting; the location of the wreck was well out of sight of any land. Another interesting aspect of the discovery is the fact that the wreck was found at a depth of 1,800 meters, with its cargo apparently intact by the London based fossil fuel company Energean which operates underwater natural gas extraction wells in the eastern Mediterranean.
Energean was searching in an area off the coast of Israel for likely new sites for gas wells using an underwater robot when the robot just happened upon the ancient wreck. From what the robot could see the ship is approximately 12-14 meters in length and lays on the ocean floor surrounded by hundreds of earthenware jars that must have held the ships cargo of oil, wine or perhaps fruit.
Once the engineers from Energean realized what they had come across they contacted the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) who announced the discovery of the wreck on the 20th of June. The wreck itself is so deep beneath the ocean’s surface that a comprehensive examination of the ship is probably impossible. However the Energean robot did succeed in bringing up two of the ship’s jars that archaeologists with the IAA have identified as being of Canaanite origin and from about the year 1,300 BCE.
The Canaanites were of course the Bronze Age enemies of the Hebrews who lived along the coast of modern Israel and Lebanon. The fact that the wreck was discovered so far from land clearly shows that the ancient mariners of the Bronze Age were not as timid as we had though and that they probably could use the position of the Sun and stars to navigate when they were away from land.
Speaking of the enemies of the ancient Hebrews as the Bronze Age turned into the Iron Age the people of Israel and Judah acquired enemies who were much more powerful than the Canaanites. The Iron Age in the Middle East was a time of empires starting with Egypt and followed by the Assyrians, Babylon and Persia.
According to the bible the Assyrians tried to conquer the two Hebrew kingdoms several times before finally subjugating the kingdom of Israel, giving rise to the legend of the ‘lost ten tribes of Israel’. They never succeeded in defeating Judah however despite their king Sennacherib laying siege to Jerusalem in 701 BCE. As told in 2Kings 19:35 the Assyrian army was encamped outside the walls of the city when “the angel of the Lord went out and put to death a hundred and eighty-five thousand in the Assyrian camp.”
The Assyrians tell it a little bit differently. Cuneiform tablets have been found in excavations at the Assyrian capital of Nineveh that relate how king Hezekiah of Judah paid Sennacherib a large tribute, and promised to behave as the Assyrian king’s vassal in order to save the city.
The truth is probably somewhere in-between but regardless an independent scholar who specializes in Near Eastern Archaeology named Stephen Compton has written an article in the journal Near Eastern Archaeology where he claims to have found the campsite of Sennacherib’s army. Now Mister Compton didn’t go digging around in Israel, instead he studied aerial photographs from the mid 20th century of the area between Jerusalem and the Hebrew town of Lachish that Sennacherib also laid siege to searching for clues as to where the Assyrian army might have camped.
What Mr. Compton was looking for in particular was a simple oval wall encompassing an area large enough for an army to camp in but without any permanent structures inside. A temporary city in other words, which is pretty much what an army camp is. Stone reliefs from Nineveh have been found that show that the Assyrians did in fact build oval shaped temporary fortifications for their army during campaigns. The location that Mr. Compton has identified is known locally as the Khirbet al Mudawwara where Mudawwara is an Arabic word that can mean a place where a sultan has placed his army. A memory perhaps of the Assyrians even after 2700 years!
If Mr. Compton’s discovery does turn out to be true it will be good evidence that the bible, like Homer’s tales, can be used as a guide for the ancient history of the Near East. Provided that is you take into account spin doctoring, exaggeration and the occasional outright falsehood.
Well Starliner finally made it, the long delayed Boeing space capsule has at last succeeded in taking live astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS). Problem is it hasn’t succeeded in returning them safely to Earth yet. Launched from the Kennedy Space Center on June 5 aboard an Atlas V rocket the Starliner Crew Flight Test (CFT) managed to dock with the ISS the next day and the two person crew of NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were welcomed by the official crew of the ISS. The launch itself was delayed several times because of faulty valves and leaks in both Starliner and the Atlas V rocket.
In fact launch was only allowed to go ahead after NASA decided that a helium leak in Starliner did not threaten the mission. Then, during the daylong trip in Low Earth Orbit (LOE) to the ISS Starliner developed another four helium leaks. Finally, as the spacecraft neared the ISS yet another technical issue appeared as five of Starliner’s twenty-eight maneuvering thrusters began to function erratically forcing a two hour delay in docking.
Because of all those problems NASA decided to delay Starliner’s return, rather than remaining at the ISS for about a week Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams have now spend more than a month at the ISS trying to resolve Starliner’s problems, or at least learn more about them. Officially NASA says that the two astronauts are not ‘stranded’ in space but this situation is certainly without precedent.
The two astronauts are in no danger; they are perfectly safe at the ISS, they could always be brought back down in a Space X Dragon capsule. If after all of the testing in orbit however NASA finally does decide that Starliner isn’t reliable enough to bring Wilmore and Williams back to Earth it would be a terrible blow to Boeing’s Starliner program, and Boeing itself.
So Starliner still has problems, but are they serious enough to cause NASA to refuse to certify the capsule for regular operation in the Commercial Crew Program. NASA does not like the idea of entrusting its astronauts to vehicles that have any technical problems, and Starliner obviously still has quite a few. The space agency could require Boeing to conduct one more CFT in the same way that it required Boeing to conduct a second unmanned Orbital Flight Test (OFT) of Starliner back in December of 2019. That decision will undoubtedly have to wait for the final mission review.
However NASA has been waiting a long time for Starliner to begin conducting regular crew rotation missions to the ISS as a part of the Commercial Crew program. In fact at the beginning of the Commercial Crew Program it was expected that Boeing would contribute the largest part of the missions to the ISS under the program. That’s why the Aerospace giant received the largest development contract, $4.2 Billion USD, while Space X received only $2.6 billion to develop their Dragon capsule. Originally NASA’s schedule called for Starliner to carry out its test flights back in 2017 and begin regular missions to the ISS in 2018, to be followed shortly thereafter by Space X’s Dragon capsule.
What eventually happened however was that Space X, after a few delays carried out its first regular mission, designated as Crew-1 in November of 2020 and has now successfully conducted nine missions as a part of the Commercial Crew Program. Space X is now contracted to conduct another 14 crew transfer missions before the ISS is officially shut down and de-orbited. The price tag for the remaining 14 Space X missions is set at $258.7 million each or $64.4 million per seat.
Currently NASA still hopes that Boeing’s Starliner can also participate in regular crew rotation missions to the ISS. Assuming that Starliner does receive certification Starliner’s first crew mission is scheduled for no earlier than 2025 and NASA has contacted Boeing to provide a total of six regular crew missions by 2030. The estimated price tag for a seat on Starliner is approximately $95 million per seat or around $380 million per mission.
Even at that price however Boeing is not going to make money on Starliner from the Commercial Crew Program. The added cost of seven years of delays, the extra unmanned OFT and the possibility of NASA requiring a second CFT will certainly cause Boeing to suffer a financial loss. However Boeing is looking beyond this decade to the 2030’s when it is expected that several privately owned space stations will be in orbit and the business of taking astronauts, scientists and even tourists to those stations will become much more profitable. Boeing had better fix its capsules remaining problems though; it already has competition in Space X’s Dragon and Sierra Nevada’s Dreamchaser mini-shuttle is scheduled to make it’s first, unmanned flight later this year.
Before I go I just want to mention some good news concerning everybody’s favourite space probe that could, Voyager 1. You’ll recall that back in November the Voyager probe began radioing back a data stream that made no sense to the Voyager team at the Jet Propulsion Labouratory (JPL). See my post of 9 September 2023. Well after a lot of effort on the part of the engineers at JPL in April they managed to correct the problem to the extent that Voyager was back in communication with Earth.
Even with that success however, there was still a considerable amount of work to be done before the probe was fully repaired. Now, on June 14th NASA announced that Voyager 1 is fully functional and sending back useful measurements about the void of interstellar space which it was the first of all human made objects to ever reach.
I’m not certain as to whether or not to classify ‘A City on Mars’ by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith as Science Fiction. You see ‘City on Mars’ is actually an overview of the many problems we humans are going to have to overcome if we really want to settle outer space. Right now we are at the very beginning of that endeavor; we currently have two small, emphasis on small, space stations that are crewed by rotating teams of astronauts about every six months. In other words nobody is actually living in space at this moment. So in a sense that makes ‘A City on Mars’ kinda fictional, doesn’t it?
No matter, Kelly and Zach Weinersmith are a pair of space enthusiasts who have done a lot of delving into the challenges that humans are going to face trying to settle, they don’t like the term colonize because of its political baggage, outer space. Having started out as proponents of space settlement they freely admit that the number and scale of those challenges has made them a lot more cautious.
In ‘A City on Mars’ the problems of space settlement are classified into three broad categories, Physiology or can humans live and multiply long term in space, where to live in space and how, and finally, what are the legal aspects of building a settlement in space. You might wonder about the inclusion of that third class, after all isn’t space the final frontier and therefore kinda lawless? However the legal challenges may be the toughest of all, if we’re going to do it without starting any wars between space powers, nations that just happen to be nuclear powers as well.
Starting with the question of whether humans can live long term in space it’s worth remembering that back in the 1950s, right before the space age began, many medical experts were convinced that humans could not survive for more than a few minutes in zero gravity. Without gravity, they said, you couldn’t even swallow, you’d get disoriented, dizzy and be unable to perform any task. Finally, without gravity your heart would race at double the normal pulse rate until before long you’d have a heart attack.
Fortunately it didn’t work out that way. By the time the first men walked on the Moon it was obvious that people could survive zero gravity for several weeks with the only impediment being some temporary weakness when you returned to Earth.
However, living in zero gravity for the rest of your life may be another matter. You see, thanks to our space stations we now have lots of data about people living in zero gravity for six months to a year at a time and it’s becoming clear that our bodies aren’t built for living there. Bone mass loss appears to be the biggest problem but there is muscle loss as well, and that’s despite astronauts putting in several hours of exercise every day. There’s also the way that fluids in your body redistribute themselves in zero gravity and that includes the shape of your eyeball causing vision problems. Of course NASA is doing a lot of medical research to find treatments to remedy these problems but it’s clear that our bodies are not built to live in zero gravity long term.
But what if we if build settlements on the Moon or Mars, they have gravity after all, it’s not as strong as Earth’s but it’s still more than zero gravity? Well the problem there is that the longest anymore has spent in partial gravity was about three days on the Moon. We have no idea about whether Lunar or Martian gravity is strong enough to prevent or even lessen any of the problems stated above.
There’s another big issue about which we have no data at all and that’s the question of trying to have children, and raise them in outer space. While it’s true that a fetus in the womb is kinda sorta in zero gravity still there’s that business of the mother’s fluids being redistributed along with her loss of bone and muscle. Then, once the child is born how will they grow in zero or partial gravity, could a child born and raised on Mars ever acquire enough muscle to be able to visit Earth? To date no experiments related to breeding and raising animals have been conducted in space so we literally know nothing about whether it can be done.
Assuming we can live and multiply somewhere in space the question now becomes where and how. After a quick review of the various choices in our solar system ‘A City on Mars’ settles on the Moon and Mars because the two of them are the closest to Earth in both distance and conditions. The problem is that even then the Moon and Mars are horrible places to live. As far as trying to live there is concerned they are both airless, waterless deserts where even the sky and ground are trying to kill you. Any people living there will have to build themselves strong shelters equipped with the means of providing air, water and food while keeping a livable temperature, oh and shielding its inhabitants from cosmic radiation.
‘A City on Mars’ also takes a chapter to discuss the choicest real estate on the Moon. You may have heard recently about how space nations are really interested in the Moon’s south pole. That’s because it’s thought that the bottom of some of the craters there may have been in complete darkness for billions of years so that there may be water there in the form of ice. Also, some of the peaks of those craters may be in almost perpetual sunlight making them the perfect places to build solar arrays for power. The fact that those areas represent less than one tenth of one percent of the Moon’s surface makes them extremely valuable, valuable enough to be the cause of violence?
Which brings me to the legal aspects of settling space. Of course so far there hasn’t been much need for the long arm of justice in space. That’s because there are only three nations that have the ability to send people into space and those nations have all made certain that the people they send are law abiding and can be expected to behave themselves while in space. Nevertheless, as more actors gain access to space, such as Space X, the race to obtain what little resources there are in space may lead to conflict.
The governing legal document covering the exploration of space right now is actually called the Outer Space Treaty or OST and it was ratified in 1967 by the only two space powers at the time, the USA and the USSR. Since that time another 110 countries have signed on including all of the major space nations. Shortly after its creation the OST was supplemented by several other agreements known as the Rescue Agreement, the Liability Convention and the Registration Convention.
So how are these treaties going regulate the way that human beings settle space? The short answer is that the OST forbids anyone from owning any part of any celestial object, in other words no ‘I claim this crater in the name of King and Country’. On the other hand anyone can explore and make use of space, so Ireland for example has the right to set up a exploratory outpost basically anyway on the Moon, but they don’t even control the ground directly beneath that outpost! Obviously that could lead to a fair amount of misunderstanding if Vietnam decides to set up their outpost in exactly the same spot as Ireland’s!
What the authors of ‘A City on Mars’ have discovered is that there isn’t a lot of rules and regulations that will govern how we settle space, which could lead to a ‘wild west’ scenario complete with shoot outs that trigger full-scale wars, between nuclear powers, back here on Earth. Remember Spain, Portugal, France, Holland and England fought a number of wars in Europe that began in the New World.
So there are a lot of problems that are going to have to be solved before humans settle space and most of them do not involve rockets or robots or spacesuits or cool technical things like that. If you’d like to know more about those nasty little details, and some of the possible solutions I think you’d like to read ‘A City on Mars’.
We’ve gotten used to big discoveries about the Universe being made by space telescopes. Hubble, the Chandra X-ray and the Kepler planet hunting telescopes have all revolutionized our picture of Universe, both near and far, big and small. Now it’s NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) along with the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Euclid space telescope that are making the discoveries so in this post I’ll be discussing one from each. I’ll start with JWST.
Although it will be making other observations the JWST was primarily designed to peer back further in time than Hubble or any ground-based telescope can. How does JWST look backward in time? Well since the speed of light is a finite 3×108 m/s you’re actually always doing that. You see if you look at the Moon you’re actually not seeing the Moon as it is but the Moon as it was about a second and a half ago because that’s how long it took the light that’s entering your eyes to get from the Moon to you!
Similarly if you look at the planet Jupiter you’re really seeing it as it was about 35 minutes ago, because Jupiter is so far away that it takes light about 50 minutes to get from the planet to your eyes. The brightest true star in the sky is Sirius at a distance of about 10 light years so that means when you look at Sirius you’re really looking 10 years into the past. Finally, if you manage to find the Andromeda galaxy, the furthest object you can see with your unaided eye, you’ll be looking about two and a half million years into the past!
So, when astronomers want to see what conditions were like in the early Universe, less than a billion years after the Big Bang let’s say, all they have to do is look far enough away. About 13.5 billion light years away if our calculations are right about the Big Bang. There are a couple of problems with that however, first of all the further away something is the smaller and dimmer it will appear to be, so you’ll need a bigger telescope. Oh, and you’d better put your telescope in space because the gas molecules moving around in Earth’s atmosphere will just smear whatever images you try to take.
There’s a second more subtle problem as well caused by the expansion of the Universe that’s called the Doppler effect. Now the Doppler effect is familiar enough to everyone. Picture yourself standing on a sidewalk and a police car or ambulance is coming toward you with its siren blaring. As the vehicle is coming toward you the siren’s pitch is quite high but as it goes past the tone drops noticeably. What is happening is that the sound waves are squeezed together as the car approaches you but then are pulled apart as it recedes. That’s the Doppler effect and it happens to light waves as well as sound.
Since the Universe itself is expanding that causes all but a very few nearby galaxies to move away from us and that causes the light from those receding galaxies to get shifted to the red. For a galaxy that’s more than 10 billion light years away it’s visible light, the light we’d like to observe it by, gets shifted all the way into the Infrared requiring much more complicated equipment to make observations. That’s why the JWST was built the way it was and placed into an orbit that’s over a million kilometers from Earth.
It’s been almost two years now since JWST began its task of studying the early Universe and the first results are starting to get published. In particular it was announced on the 30th of May that JWST had broken its own record for discovering the farthest, and hence youngest galaxy ever observed. The galaxy has been given the designation of JADES-GS-z14-0 and it is estimated to have existed a mere 290 million years after the Big Bang.
Now JADES-GS-z14-0 is a small galaxy compared to modern galaxies like the Milky Way or Andromeda, being measured at about 1,600 light years across and only having a mass of a couple of million stars. Unlike other early galaxies, which appear to get most of their light from gas falling into the supermassive black hole in their center, JADES-GS-z14-0 seems to get its light from millions of very bright, young stars.
The fact that such a well developed galaxy could have formed in such a short time after the Big Bang has a lot of early Universe theorists scratching their heads but there it is, and it appears certain that JWST will discover more of them in the days to come. So our models of how the first galaxies came into being are just going to have to change to account for the observable facts.
In the same way new observations by the ESA’s Euclid space telescope are upending some of our ideas about how stars form in the present Universe. You see fifty years ago our models of star formation basically started with a gas cloud in the Milky Way collapsing due to gravity. As the cloud condensed it split into smaller clouds each of which was just big enough to then condense further into a star and maybe some planets. At that time we weren’t even certain how many stars had planets.
Back then some astronomers suggested that there might be objects smaller than stars roaming interstellar space, objects too small to ignite the nuclear fire that makes stars shine so they would be dark. These proposed objects were given the name Brown Dwarf stars, but nobody knew how to find them. Well over the last decade or so we’ve found a couple of dozen and so brown dwarfs are now a recognized part of the celestial zoo. (See my posts of 22September 2021 and 19August 2023 for more about Brown Dwarf stars)
So if brown dwarfs are real that begs the question, are there even smaller objects floating through space, planet sized objects that either never belonged to a star or that somehow got kicked out of their solar system. These objects have been named rogue planets and the Euclid space Telescope has discovered seven of them, so far!
Just imagine an object, just about the size of our Earth that for billions of years has been traveling through the galaxy without the warmth of any star, cold and alone. Some astronomers are already suggesting that our galaxy may contain more than a trillion such rogue planets. After all with the mass of a single star you could make hundreds of thousands of planets so if the stellar nurseries that produce the stars also make rogue planets there probably are more of them out there than the stars.
Every time we look at the Universe with newer, better instruments we find new and unexpected objects out there to understand.
There have been several interesting discoveries made recently about animals that lived during the Mesozoic Era, the ‘Age of the Dinosaurs’ from about 230 to 66 million years ago. Three of the four studies deal with dinos themselves but since I like to start with the oldest and work my way forward in time I’m going start with the non-dino story.
However I suppose most people would regard an Aetosaur as a dinosaur, in the Triassic period Aetosaurs were a group of large reptiles with extremely thick, bony scales covering their bodies for protection. The Aetosaurs dominated the land about 220 million years ago just before the rise of the dinosaurs and are in fact the ancestors of our modern crocodiles and alligators.
Aetosaur fossils have been unearthed on every continent except Antarctica and Australia but for the most part the fossils have been isolated specimens of those thick bony scales. Bones and nearly complete skeletons of Aetosaurs are quite rare. That’s what makes the recent paper describing a new species of Aetosaur from Texas so important; the animal’s remains are about 70% complete. In a new article describing the fossil it has been given the name Garzapelta muelleri because it was discovered in Garza county in Texas, it’s covered with a very strong skin or pelt and it was originally unearthed by paleontologist Bill Mueller.
Garzapelta muelleri is actually not a new discovery however; in fact the fossil had been lying in a storage room at Texas Tech University for almost thirty years. It wasn’t until graduate student Bill Reyes came across the fossil and decided it might be worth spending several years cleaning it up and preparing it for study that G muelleri could finally be described and published. Another example of how some of the best fossil hunting is done in the basements and storage rooms of natural history museums.
Getting back to actual dinosaurs, not all fossils are from the remains of animals who died long ago, many are the remains of the activity of extinct creatures, especially their tracks or footprints. Hundreds of examples of dinosaur footprints are known, from many different types of dinosaurs, although narrowing any footprints down to a single species that made them is difficult.
A newly recognized track of footprints in Colorado are now being announced as the longest known track by a sauropod dinosaur, those huge long necked and long tailed dinosaurs that were the largest animals to ever walk on land. The site contains an estimated 134 steps by the animal who appears to have been heading north, turned east before changing it’s mind and turning around to go west. The turning around motion is something never seen before for sauropods and will tell us a lot about how they moved.
The trail is now the property of the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests who bought the property from the Charles family whose children had played among the ‘potholes’ for years without knowing they were dinosaur footprints. The good news is that you can visit the footprints in the National Forest. The bad news is that it’s a three-kilometer hike up a steep grade to the 2800-meter elevation site.
Back when I was first learning about dinosaurs it was assumed that they were cold blooded animals like other reptiles but nowadays nearly all paleontologists think that at least some groups of dinosaurs were warm blooded. The clearest evidence for this idea comes from well preserved fossil impressions showing that some dinosaurs had evolved feathers, not for flight but instead as insulation to keep warm. At the same time there are many early bird fossils that show anatomical similarities to dinosaurs!
So if dinosaurs did evolve warm bloodiness the questions we need to ask are, when did dinosaurs become warm blooded, which dinosaur groups evolved to be warm blooded and perhaps most critically, just how do we answer those two questions? Now a new study by a group of paleontologists from the University College of London and the University of Vigo in Spain has tried to understand warm bloodiness in dinosaurs by examining their distribution in various temperature regions of the Mesozoic world.
Look at it this way, the whole reason for an animal to evolve to be warm blooded is so that they can be active in cold temperatures. That’s why you don’t see many reptiles in Polar Regions and that’s why both reptiles and insects like to sun themselves in the morning to warm their bodies. It’s the heat that they get from the Sun that allows them to become active. On the other hand the metabolism of mammals and birds is always high because of their warm blood. So, the researchers reasoned, if fossils of dinosaur species have been found in locations that were cold back when the dinos lived there then it’s a fair bet that those dinosaur species were warm blooded!
According to that logic the study found that it was the members of the Theropod and Ornithischian groups of dinosaurs that became warm blooded approximately 180 million years ago. The theropods are the two legged predators like T rex and Velociraptor while the ornithischians contain such species as triceratops and the hadrosaurs. The sauropods, the biggest of the dinosaurs stayed in the warmer, tropical regions and do not appear to have evolved warm bloodiness. The study suggests that the sauropods may have evolved their huge size in order to store heat in their massive bodies rather than generate it by becoming warm blooded.
Finally, I mentioned above that there is now abundant evidence that some species of dinosaur possessed feathers over at least some parts of their bodies in order to keep them warm. The Velociraptor is thought to be one of those species. However the precise details of the evolution of feathers from reptile scales are still rather mysterious.
Now a new specimen of a feathered dinosaur called Psittacosaurus is revealed some of those details. A small creature from about 135-120 million years ago Psittacosaurus belonged to the branch of dinosaurs that would soon evolve into the birds we know today. Previously examined fossils of Psittacosaurus have shown that the animal had some feathers that covered a portion of its body and initially the specimen NJUES-10 appeared to be the same.
It was only when specimen NJUES-10 was examined under Ultra-Violet (UV) light that impressions of its skin from other places on its body were discovered. After further examinations with both X-rays and Infra-Red (IR) light it became clear that Psittacosaurus had lizard like scales everywhere on its body that didn’t have feathers. In other words, even as dinosaurs were evolving feathers they still kept their reptilian scales in order to protect the rest of their bodies. Psittacosaurus therefore appears to have been truly half dinosaur and half bird, a real missing link.
Even with all of the research that has gone into studying dinosaurs over the last 200 years there’s still plenty of questions left to be answered.
I never knew there were so many ways to subvert democracy. ‘Tyranny of the Minority’, the new book by Harvard professors of Government Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt is a detailed and sobering account of the many ways that a democratic nation, a nation that at least tries to apply the rule of law fairly and equally to all its people can be derailed and even destroyed by an authoritarian minority. Although the main thrust of the book is the current state of our American democracy the authors use examples from nations around the world and times past to illustrate their arguments.
Democracy is a risky thing for a politician, losing an election can mean no job, an uncertain future and worst of all no power. In a democracy however a politician has to be willing to accept the choice of the people. If a politician losses they must congratulate the winner and plan for the next election, that’s the only way to learn from their mistakes. It’s no wonder therefore that many politicians try to seize power against the will of the majority, not only by violent means but by cheating as well.
Professors Levitsky and Ziblatt begin by looking at examples of coup d’etat over the last hundred years or so to discover both the rules that a loyal supporter of democracy must follow as well as the techniques that authoritarians use to sabotage a working democracy. As the authors see it a politician who values democracy and wants to see it thrive must accept three rules:
1. They must accept their losses. This is primary because without one side accepting defeat, even if they feel irregularities have cost them, then the peaceful transfer of power, which is the greatest benefit of a democratic system of government, will soon descend into violence. An example of this was when Al Gore accepted his defeat in 2000 even though the final vote counting in Florida was not yet completed. He accepted his loss for the sake of America’s democracy and the peaceful transfer of power.
2. Every politician loyal to democracy must immediately sever all ties to any other politician who even attempts to overturn the results of an election, whether by violence or by cheating. Toleration of authoritarian politicians, even if they are popular with your party’s base, only empowers them leading to further attacks on democracy. Recent examples of this form of toleration are the many Republicans who remain silent about the attacks on our democracy by Donald Trump.
3. Politicians of all parties must be willing to work across party lines in defense of democracy, even at the risk of their own politician ambitions. Examples of this are the way that the conservative politicians Liz Chaney and Adam Kinzinger worked with liberal Democrats to investigate the January 6th attack on the Capitol that was instigated by Trump, a choice that cost them both their seats in the US House.
At the same time ‘Tyranny of the Minority’ also details the playbook of those politicians to seek to cheat, who try to obtain some slight advantage over their opponents. Of course in the end this cheating continues until democracy is gone and a dictatorship has been established. Some of the techniques used by extremists include:
1. Exploiting gaps in the law. As an example, over the more than 200-year history of the American Presidency many holders of that office have had to make many difficult decisions, decisions that were later often criticized by both their opponents and historians. In all of those years however no President has ever claimed immunity from legal prosecution, no President has ever had to, ever wanted to. Until Trump, who is currently arguing that a President must have immunity in order to do their jobs. Of course Trump’s real desire is to escape the consequences of his actions in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
2. Excessive or Undue use of the Law. An example of this would be the use by the President of his power to pardon in order to keep co-conspirators from giving evidence against him. During Watergate President Nixon never pardoned any of those who were involved in the burglary or cover-up. Trump however has promised to pardon all of those who have been convicted of crimes committed during the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
3. Selective enforcement of the law, especially voting laws. This one is insidious. During the Jim Crow era in the Southern US laws requiring voters to pay a Poll Tax or pass an Intelligence Test were strictly enforced against black voters while white voters were simply allowed to vote without any of those requirements being enforced against them.
4. Lawfare. This is a new term created for those laws that are intended for no other purpose than to give one party in an election an advantage against the other. Examples of this include the Poll Taxes and Intelligence Tests of the past that are now being replaced by Voter I.D. laws. The process of Gerrymandering, the creation of political districts in such a way as to put all of your opponents supporters into a few districts while your supporters are spread out over a large number of districts is a prime example of Lawfare.
Simply reviewing these anti-democratic practices brings to mind much of the politics of the last 40 years here in the US. It’s at this point that ‘Tyranny of the Minority’ goes into the process of how the Republican Party, a party than once prided itself on its adherence to democratic principles has become distorted into the party of Trump. To be certain Trump did not start the process, it really began in earnest in 1992 when the Democrat Bill Clinton won the Presidency. Rather than try to learn a lesson and reform their party in order to win in a later election the Republicans decide to start cheating, to “win at all costs” as they did in Florida in 2000. Then, when Barack Obama, the first black president was elected the Republicans simply went crazy, a madness from which they have still to recover.
Because of this obstinacy the Republican Party has slowly but surely become a minority party. In the last eight Presidential elections the Republican candidate has won the popular vote only once, but thanks to the antiquated Electoral College, which as recently as 1970 the Republicans wanted to get rid of, they have won the Presidency three times. Republicans have become welded to their low taxes on the rich while distracting people with culture wars policies. They know that they cannot achieve a majority with those principles so they can only cheat, and by cheating subvert and eventually destroy democracy.
‘Tyranny of the Minority’ is a very sobering book but at the same time that it details to dangers to our democracy it also offers the hope of those people, those politicians who will work for, and when necessary fight for democracy. If you support democracy I can only hope that you will take the time to read ‘Tyranny of the Minority’.
We all know that plastics are almost everywhere nowadays. There are many reasons for this but two are most important. First of all plastic is versatile; it seems like nearly anything can be made out of plastic. And its cheap, derived from petroleum the chemical process of making plastic is simple and by the process of injection molding turning plastic into a product is again very simple and easy to accomplish. Because of its usefulness and low cost the human race is currently producing about 400 million tonnes of plastic waste every year. That’s about the same mass as that of every person on this planet.
So as I said plastic is everywhere, too much of it and it is piling up not only in landfills but in places we don’t want it, like our rivers, streams and oceans. Plastic is a miracle, but I like to say it’s a miracle that doesn’t go away once it has accomplished the task it was created for. To be specific plastic is so stable a chemical that it doesn’t breakdown chemically in the way wood or paper or even iron will eventually do.
So all of the plastic trash that we throw out just piles up, layer by layer. Because of this plastic pollution is now vying with Global Warming to be our biggest environmental problem. Even worse, although plastic doesn’t breakdown chemically it will over time breakdown mechanically, that is to say plastic products will break into smaller and smaller pieces of plastic. Pieces so small that they are called microparticles, so small that they get into our water, into our food and even the air that we breath. Pieces so small that they have now been detected inside us, in our stomachs, in our lungs and even in our blood.
Plastics have become so big a problem that last month negotiators from 175 countries met in Ottawa, Canadian to try to hammer out an international treaty to regulate plastics. Like the annual COP conferences that are held to address Climate Change the plastics meeting is a yearly affair, last year’s gathering was held in Kenya.
Also like the COP Climate Change conference the meeting on Plastics was not only attended by negotiators with their scientific and environmental advisors but also by representatives of the petroleum industry, lobbyists whose only concern is the profits of the oil companies who pay them. Worldwide the manufacture of plastics is valued at over $700 billion dollars annually so the industry can afford to hire a lot of lobbyists.
These special interests have formed themselves into organizations like the Plastics Industry Association and America’s Plastic Makers in order to use their influence to prevent any actual limits to plastic production from getting into any treaty. Aiding them in their efforts are negotiators for counties with national oil companies like Saudi Arabia, Russia and Venezuela who also sought to avoid anything that would reduce oil production.
Instead of legally limiting the amount of plastic that is produced in the world these apologists for the plastics industry advocate recycling as the best approach to eliminating the plastic trash that is choking our planet. If you think about it that argument doesn’t really work for the petroleum industry because if we recycled all of the plastic products we use into new plastic products then we still wouldn’t need to make any more plastic, so we wouldn’t need any more oil from them.
In truth however the lobbyists for the oil companies know that we do a lousy job of recycling, only around 5% of the plastic that gets produced every year ends up being recycled. To make matters worse the plastic companies themselves sabotage the recycling effort they promote by making seven different types of plastic, each of which requires a different technique to recycle. In fact several of the types of plastics being manufactured cannot even be recycled economically. Combined these factors make the handling and sorting of recycled plastic products very labour intensive and therefore so expensive that in reality very little of the plastics being produced are ever actually recycled.
At the conference itself there was a proposal by the delegates from Peru and Rwanda to actually cut back on the scale of plastic production. This proposal was supported by 29 other nations but in the end the US and UK bowed to pressure from the plastics manufacturers and the conference ended without any agreement on cutbacks.
The lobbyists had good reason to gloat about their victory. According to Matt Seaholm. CEO of the Plastics Industry Association the US did “a very good job of trying to balance all of the interests.” Which is just another way of saying the conference achieved nothing. Not only was there no agreement on reducing production of plastics but there was also no implementation of any policy that could actually increase the amount of plastics that are recycled. The plastics industry, which is just a subset of the petroleum industry, got everything they wanted and environmentalists got nothing.
There will of course be another international conference on plastics next year in Busan, South Korea. Bureaucrats just love big conferences that allow them to travel to other countries on taxpayer’s money. Like the annual COP conference on Climate Change however it appears that nothing will happen to combat either of these environmental threats until there is a real crisis, until there are so many people dying that the problems can no longer be ignored. By that time it will be too late because the buildup of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere along with the plastic on the land and in the oceans will continue to poison our planet for at least decades to come.
When most people think of the kind of tools that an Archaeologists use in their study of ancient people the first thing to come to mind would probably be either a shovel or a trowel. After all, archaeology is about digging up the lost artifacts from bygone civilizations isn’t it?
Well in my post today I’ll be discussing a couple of studies that employ the latest technological tools that archaeologists now have to help them learn about past cultures. As usual I’ll start with the oldest story and work my way forward in time.
Surprisingly enough over the last few years DNA has become one of the most important tools in archaeology, see my posts of 10 August 2019, 22 July 2020 and 14 January 2020 for example. The ability to demonstrate, or refute, genetic connections between two or more archaeological sites has answered many long disputed questions about the past.
Now a new study published in the journal Science Advances has used both ancient and modern DNA to reveal some surprising facts about the genetic relationships of the indigenous people of North America, in particular the people of the Blackfoot Confederacy. Historically these tribes lived in the northern plains of the US and southern Canada between the Rocky Mountains and the Great Lakes. According to Blackfoot legends those plains had been their home as far back as the end of the last ice age more than 10,000 years ago. These legends have also been supported by archaeological evidence collected from the region.
The new study compared DNA taken from seven ancient burials unearthed in the region inhabited in the Blackfoot to that of six modern day members of the Blackfoot Nation. What the researchers, led by Dorothy First Rider of the Blood First Nation Organization in Canada discovered was a high proportion of shared alleles between the ancient and modern samples, strong evidence for a direct genetic relationship, even after thousands of years. Comparisons were also made to nearby native peoples. These comparisons indicated that the Blackfoot / Blood native nations separated as long ago as 18,000 years while the separation of the Blackfoot and Athabascan peoples occurred about 13,000 years ago.
The fact that the Blackfoot Nation may have remained a homogenous group living in the same place for so long may even have legal repercussions. That’s because the Blackfoot legacy has for decades been at the center of numerous lawsuits over land and water rights in the ancestral Blackfoot homeland. The DNA evidence detailed in the study may help the original inhabitants to have a greater say in how those lands are treated today.
Another high tech tool that is starting to find applications in archaeology is Artificial Intelligence or AI for short. Computer algorithms that can learn from their mistakes are now appearing in a wide range of research fields from driverless cars to deep fake images to deciphering ancient cuneiform tablets. See my post of 16 September 2023.
Now a contest, open to literally anyone has succeeded in using AI to reveal the text written on a 2,000 year old papyrus scroll that was charred beyond recognition, but still kept in one piece, by the eruption of Vesuvius that buried the town of Pompey. The scroll is one of hundreds that were excavated from a luxury villa in the nearby town of Herculaneum back in the 18th century.
In the more than 200 years since their discovery many attempts had been made to read the scrolls, all without success and some of which caused considerable damage to the fragile remains of ancient writing. Then, in 2019 Brent Seals, a computer researcher at the University of Kentucky developed software that could virtually unwrap the outer layers of two of the scrolls using the scans produced by Computed Tomography (CT). Those scans by themselves were still unreadable however because the density of the ink used on the scrolls was the same as the papyrus itself. CT scans generate 3D images of the inside of objects by measuring the difference in densities of the materials of which the object is composed.
It was at this point that Seales thought of the idea of a contest among AI researchers in the hope that someone, or some team could take the scans he had produced and finally decipher the text of the ancient scrolls. With the financial assistance of Nat Friedman, a well known Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur, Seales raised $700,000 dollars and announced the Vesuvius Challenge. The criteria set for the winners was to decipher at least 4 passages of at least 140 characters each.
Three students, Luke Farritor, a undergraduate computer science major at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Youssef Nader, a Ph.D. candidate from Egypt who is studying in Berlin along with Julian Schilliger a robotics student at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich pooled their respective talents in order to decipher 15 columns of text, about 15% of the entire scroll, enough to win the prize.
The scroll turned out to be a treatise on pleasure based upon the Greek Epicurean school of philosophy. Specifically the writing discussed the pleasures of music and food spiced with capers. The ability of the AI programs developed by Seales, Farritor, Nader and Schilliger to decode the blackened remains of the scroll has given archaeologists hope that at least some portions of the other 200 Herculaneum scrolls may also be deciphered.
Not only that, but the ancient Roman villa in which the scrolls were discovered has never been completely excavated. Large sections of both Pompey and Herculaneum have been intentionally left for future archaeologists, with more advanced technology to study. Who knows what other wisdom from the classical Roman period lie waiting to be unearthed and hopefully read?
Just two examples of how new technology, new tools can bring new discoveries that allow us to better understand the ancient world.
‘The Space Between Worlds’ is the debut novel for author Micaiah Johnson and she’s got a good solid hit for her first at bat. The Space in the title specifically refers to traveling to alternate Universes across the Multiverse. Cara, the main character in the novel, is traverser, one of the few people who can safely travel to some of those alternate worlds.
You see there are a couple of catches to traversing, one is that travel is only possible to Universes that are closely similar to our own and second, if you try to go to an alternate Universe where you are still alive that Universe will reject you and send you back to Earth zero either dead or dying.
That’s what makes Cara so valuable, on the 380 Universes that can be reached by the inhabitants of Earth zero; she’s already dead in 372. That means she can visit more Universes than anyone else. Part of the reason why Cara has died so often is that she grew up in Ashland, the ‘poor side of town’ where life is hard, violent and short and Cara’s early life was hard even for Ashland.
Now however she lives and works in Wiley, a walled city where life is comfortable and rich, and she plans on staying right where she is. I don’t know if author Micaiah Johnson was thinking about a future where an ecological disaster had turned our present day ‘gated communities’ into walled cities like Wiley while the rest of Earth turns into an Ashland but that’s definitely how I pictured the novel’s Earth zero, Cara’s Universe. Ms. Johnson is quite good at describing just enough of Earth zero, and the technology of Traversing to let your imagination do the rest.
Ms. Johnson is also good at plot twists, I lost count at how many there were in ‘The Space Between World’s’ but the first one was a real duzzy, it grabbed me and definitely made me want to finish the story. Indeed, the whole novel is pretty fast paced with more than a few memorable scenes.
There’s a bit of romance in ‘The Space Between World’s’ as well with Cara yearning for a relationship with her handler Dell. This attraction brings a bit of classism and racism into the story because while Cara is dark and from Ashland, Dell is light and from a rich Wiley family leading to a lot of sexual tension between the two women.
I do have a couple of criticisms of ‘The Space Between World’s’, for one thing you know right from the beginning that Cara and Dell will wind up together and sure enough while at the end it’s not quite ‘happily ever after’ there’s a good possibility that it eventually will be. More importantly, after a terrific beginning and an exciting middle I found the ending to be a bit of an anticlimax, not bad, but not really as grabbing as the first two-thirds of the novel.
Nevertheless, ‘The Space Between World’s’ is certainly a good debut novel for author Micaiah Johnson, telling a story that’s both interesting and exciting. I heartily recommend ‘The Space Between World’s’ and I’m looking forward to Ms. Johnson’s next novel.