Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) are they the technology we need to feed our Growing Population? Or are they a Frankenstein Monster waiting to strike? Two stories that Illustrate the Promise and the Peril.

You hear about Genetically Modified Organisms every now and then on the news. Usually referred to as GMOs they are generating a great deal of excitement among biochemists and the food industry while causing just as much fear in some parts of the general population.

In a sense we have been modifying living creatures for 10,000 years. Starting with wolves we selectively bred them to enhance the characteristics we desired until we got man’s best friend the dog. Using the same techniques human beings have selectively bred hundreds of species of plant and animal to give us pretty much all of the food we, and our selectively bred pets, eat!

Selective breeding is genetic modification from the outside however. It’s only over the last 30-40 years that biochemists have been able to go straight to a living creature’s DNA and directly modify it. And it’s only in the past five years that scientists have possessed the precise and efficient gene-modifying tool known as CRISPR. (See my Posts of 5Aug17, 1Sept18 and 1Dec18 to learn more about CRISPR and how this gene-editing tool works).

How CRISPR Works (Credit: Genetic Literacy Project)

Using CRISPR biochemists hope to modify the plants and animals we eat in order to make them to grow larger more quickly, while requiring less fertilizer or feed. This would of course make food both cheaper and more abundant and in a world where more than 10% of the population goes to bed hungry that has to be a good thing.

One study could be a real game changer in the effort to produce more nourishing food. Researchers at the University of Illinois have been able to genetically modify the biochemical factories of plants in order to dramatically increase the efficiency of photosynthesis itself.

Production of Glucose by Photosynthesis (Credit: 19.eap-ing.de)

You’ll recall that photosynthesis is the chemical process by which plants use sunlight to convert carbon dioxide and water into sugars. In fact photosynthesis is the basic chemical reaction by which all of the world’s food is produced! Photosynthesis is rather inefficient however; it is chemically unable to distinguish between a carbon dioxide and oxygen molecules. According to plant biologist Donald Ort, the study’s senior author, “This is essentially anti-photosynthesis, and the plant produces a toxic compound that it has to recycle and detoxify.”

The researchers modified the DNA of Tobacco plants to simplify and speed up that detoxifying process resulting in plants that grew larger much more quickly, see image below. Dr. Ort and his team choose tobacco plants as a test subject because tobacco grows quickly and possesses genes that are easy to manipulate. The results are certainly impressive with tobacco plants that are 40% larger than ordinary plants.

Increased Growth of Tobacco Plants Achieved by Gene Editing (Credit: Clair Benjamin)

Having demonstrated the advantages of their approach the biochemists are now applying their technique to more useful plants like potatoes and soybeans. If this enhanced photosynthesis can be applied to other vegetable crops the resulting increase in food production could go a long way to helping feed the hungry nations of the world.

Some scientists are using gene editing to be a little more creative. One group wants to develop a spicy, peppery tomato. Now it turns out that tomatoes and peppers are pretty closely related, having split apart only about 20 million years ago. This means that the genes to produce Capsaicin, the chemical that makes peppers spicy, are still there inside a tomato’s DNA but according to co-author Agustin Zsögön they “are just not active.” Dr. Zsögön hopes to reactivate those genes allowing the humble tomato the ability to be as hot as any chilli pepper.

Can Gene Editing Produce a Spicy Tomato (Credit: Healthy Eating)

So why would scientists be so keen on developing a spicy tomato. Well the chemical capsaicin does more than just make your food taste spicy. Research has shown that capsaicin compounds are high in antioxidants; help the body fight cancerous tumors while aiding in both weight and pain management.

Right now the challenge is in determining which genes within the tomato to either turn back on, or turn off in order to get tomatoes to start producing capsaicin. Still, in a few years you may not need that habanero pepper in order to put some heat in your recipe for enchilada sauce!

Whether we use gene editing to greatly increase food production or just put a little more spice in our meals there are going to be people who are concerned about what other, unintentional chemicals we may be putting in what we eat. The workings of DNA, and the processes by which it controls the growth of cells are still largely unknown. The fear is that by modifying the genes of organisms to make them produce more food, we may also cause them to produce poisons or other deadly chemicals.

The scientists working on gene editing techniques are aware of this problem. As Dr. Ort says, “…any enhanced crops would undergo rigorous testing before they are ever consumed by humans.” Scientists like Dr. Ort may be determined to go slowly and test completely but what about large food corporations who are determined to both keep costs down and get their new products on the market before their competitors do. And not all the scientists are as trustworthy as Dr. Ort. Remember Chinese scientist He Jiankui who just two months ago revealed that he had used CRISPR on human embryos!

Dr. He defends his Research at the Genome Summit (Credit: BBC)

Like every advance in science gene editing can either benefit the world or harm it. It’s up to us, all of us to decide which it will be.

Attempts to Cleanup the Great Pacific Garbage Patch run into Problems. Well, We sort of knew this wasn’t going to be Easy!

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch doesn’t get very much press coverage so you may not have heard about it. Simply put; the trash we are continuously dumping into the world’s oceans is drifting along in the currents and finally accumulating in calm areas generating massive trash heaps just floating out there. See images below for some close up views of the situation.

A Sample of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (Credit: National Geographic)
The Rubbish looks even worse from Beneath (Credit: Padi)

The present size of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is estimated at an area greater than that of the nation of Germany but it is only the largest of many the trash dumps that are growing near of the middle of every ocean. In fact the Atlantic and Pacific oceans both have two, one each in the northern and southern hemispheres. See image below.

Worldwide Distribution of Garbage Patches (Credit: St. Louis Earth Day)

Now the vast majority of the waste filling up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is plastic simply because plastic floats quite nicely and because it is so inert that it can easily float in the ocean for decades, or even longer, slowly building up more and more trash. Seriously, the amount of plastic products that human beings just toss away in monumental. For example every day the human race simply tosses away about one and a half billion plastic straws and plastic bags, each! And it isn’t just straws and bags; plastic items from pill bottles to huge commercial fishing nets are a large part of the problem as well.

So isn’t it a good thing then that all of that rubbish is gathering by itself into empty regions of the oceans? Where we don’t have to worry about it.

Well of course the creatures of the oceans who live there have to worry, or rather simply die because of our refusal to clean up our own mess. The images below show just a few of the millions of animals who die every year by plastic. However the biggest problem is one you can’t easily see because as this layer of plastic floats on the ocean surface it prevents oxygen from getting into the water beneath, turning a large part of the ocean into a lifeless desert!

Even If I didn’t like Turtles This Picture would be Heartrending (Credit: Stefan Leijon)
Another Victim of our Careless Disposing of Plastic Waste (Credit: Mashable.com)

Still thinking that doesn’t bother you! Well how about this. While plastic is very inert chemically, as I said above it can float in the ocean for decades, that doesn’t mean that it can’t be mechanically broken down into smaller pieces. Research has shown that after 5, 10, 20 years in the ocean wave action can turn a plastic bag into thousands of plastic micro-particles just the right size to get mixed in with the algae that is the food for small fish like sardines and anchovies. Those small fish get the micro-particles into them and then they are eaten by bigger fish like salmon and tuna. The upshot of all this is that if you like seafood you probably already have some plastic micro-particles inside of you!

So what can we do about these mountains of plastic trash that are suffocating the oceans. Well a young inventor named Boyan Slat came up with an interesting idea about 7 years ago when he was just 17. Organizing a non-profit called ‘The Ocean Cleanup’ Slat succeeded in raising enough money to get his invention built. Slat’s invention was towed out of San Francisco back in September and deployed into the area of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. See image below.

Boyan Slat’s Ocean Cleanup Barrier Being Towed out of San Francisco (Credit: Scuba News)

Basically the cleanup device consists of a 700-meter long barrier made of plastic tubes shaped like a big “U” see image below. The idea is for the barrier to float in the currents gathering the plastic trash into its mouth. Whenever the U becomes full a ship is dispatched to remove the rubbish so that it can be disposed of properly.

How The Ocean Cleanup Barrier is intended to Work (Credit: BBC)

Even if the invention worked perfectly it still wasn’t the total solution. While Slat maintained that sealife would be able to swim under the barrier to escape ocean biologists feel that many of the smallest creatures, like the algae I mentioned above, will be killed. Also it would take thousands of such barriers to have any real impact, along with the ships needed to empty them and all that will cost a lot!

And of course the prototype is having some problems, I know from experience that prototypes usually do. For one thing the U simply isn’t gathering up as much trash as was hoped, Slat feels that the barrier isn’t moving fast enough through the water to keep the plastic inside the U. He is already working on improvements to increase the speed. Then just this past week a 20-meter long section of the barrier broke off requiring major repair. Which may actually allow time for some of the upgrades to be installed!

So Slat’s barrier has some way to go before it can really show what it can do. I wish him good luck and hope his invention will prove to be a part of the solution to this growing problem.

Still Slat’s barrier is only treating the symptoms of our disposable society’s love affair with plastic! We need a more fundamental approach to just using less plastic along with reusing more of what we do produce!

So how about this. The next time you’re at a restaurant and you order a soda tell the waitress you don’t need a straw, oh and get yourself a nice cloth bag and take it with you the next time you go shopping for groceries!

China’s Chang’e4 Probe becomes first spacecraft to land on the Far Side of the Moon.

Don’t call it the dark side! Just because the Moon keeps the same face towards the Earth doesn’t mean the other side is dark. In fact the side of the Moon we can’t see gets just as much sunlight as the side we can see. Still the Lunar Farside has always been a land of mystery.

We do have photographs of the farside, taken by the lunar orbiter series of space probes that made detailed images of the entire Moon’s surface in preparation for the Apollo landing, see image below. However, even during the heyday of Apollo NASA never considered landing a probe on the surface of farside let alone a manned landing. NASA’s reason for avoiding the farside is quite simple, if you go behind the Moon in order to visit the farside you’re not only out of sight, you’re out of radio contact, so an unmanned probe couldn’t get its data back to Earth anyway! Because of this the Moon’s farside remained untouched for almost 50 years after Apollo.

The Farside of the Moon as compiled from Lunar Orbiter Photos (Credit: NASA)

Now however China’s National Space Agency (CNSA) has succeeded in landing the Chang’e 4, a sophisticated robotic probe that even carries a small rover, onto the Moon’s farside. So how did the Chinese resolve the problem of communicating with the Chang’e 4 as it landed in Aitken Basin, the Moon’s largest and oldest impact crater. Well they did so by first putting a relay satellite named Queqiao into lunar orbit. In this way Chang’e 4 will remain in constant contact with its command center back on Earth. See image below.

The Queqiao Relay Satellite keeps the Chang’e 4 Lander in contact with Earth (CNSA)

The Chang’e 4 was launched aboard a Long March 3B carrier rocket back on December 7th and went into lunar orbit on December 12th, see image below. As is usually the case with Chinese space missions there was no public statement of exactly when the Chang’e 4 would land, the announcement came only after Chang’e 4 was safely on the ground.

Launch of the Chang’e 4 Lander (Credit: CNSA)

But Chang’e 4 did land safety and has already begun to send back close up images from the surface of farside, see image below. Then after about a day to check out all of the lander’s systems the Chinese ordered Chang’e 4 to deploy it’s 6-wheeled rover named Yutu. See images below of the Yutu rover descending from the Chang’e 4 main lander.

Ground level Image of the Farside of the Moon (Credit: CNSA)
The Yutu Rover at the bottom of its ramp (Credit: CNSA)
The Yutu Rover making the first Tracks on the Farside of the Moon (Credit: CNSA)

In addition to experiments dealing with lunar geology and interactions of the solar wind on the lunar surface the Chang’e 4 will be carrying out some simple low frequency radio astronomy observations. You see here on Earth all of the electronic devices that are a part of modern society interfere with all of the low frequency signals coming from outer space, and more and more the high frequency ones as well. But on the farside of the Moon Chang’e 4 will be shielded from all of mankind’s artificial signals allowing it to see those from astronomical sources only. Radio astronomers hope that one day the farside of the Moon will serve as a platform for huge radio telescopes with which they can see the Universe without worrying about artificial interference.

Chang’e 4 represents another major step forward in China’s space program. Having become only the third nation to launch humans into space China is currently developing its own, small space station and is moving forward with robotic lunar and interplanetary probes. Taking a slow but steady approach as opposed to NASA’s herky jerky bursts in different directions China hopes to put a man on the Moon sometime in the mid to late 2020s, the same time frame as NASA (see my post of 31Dec2018). In that case we are in another space race back to the Moon, if a quieter one. I wonder who will win this time!

Before I go; with all of the excitement of New Horizons exploring Ultima Thule and Chang’e 4 landing on the Moon’s farside it was easy to miss the news that the Osiris-REX spacecraft has gone into orbit around the asteroid Bennu, the smallest, least massive object which a space probe has ever orbited. Now Osiris-REX will take a few months to study Bennu in order to determine a suitable landing spot from which it will obtain a sample of the asteroid for return to Earth.

Close up view of the asteroid Bennu as seen by the Osiris-Rex space probe (Credit: Earth Sky)

New Horizons Space Probe gets Science off to a good start in the year 2019 with a Flyby of the most distant world ever visited.

Just 33 minutes past midnight on January the first here on the US East Coast NASA’s New Horizons space probe made it’s closest approach to the Kuiper belt object 2014 MU69 better known by it’s unofficial nickname Ultima Thule. The Ultima Thule flyby comes three and a half years after New Horizons hugely successful mission to Pluto back in 2015 and was actually added on to the original Pluto mission because New Horizons was in such good shape that a flyby of Ultima Thule seemed possible.

The New Horizons Space Probe Swept Past Pluto back in 2015 (Credit: NASA)

In fact Ultima Thule was not even discovered until 2014, eight years after New Horizons had been launched back in January of 2006 so the flyby represents the first time that a space probe has visited a world that wasn’t discovered until after the probe was launched.

Ultima Thule is so far away, 6.5 Billion kilometers, that even traveling at the speed of light it wasn’t until 10:30 the next morning that the scientists at the Applied Physics Laboratory (APL, which manages the space probe for NASA) received the signals telling them that New Horizons had successfully carried out the mission. At that distance the rate at which New Horizons’ transmitter can send back the data it collected is also very low, only 1 kilobyte per second. In fact it will take 20 months for New Horizons to send all of its discoveries back to Earth.

However, knowing how anxious the public was to see some results the scientists at APL quickly published a rough first image; see below, which showed an obviously bilobed object some 30 km by 15 km. It wasn’t until a press conference the next day (January 2nd and which I just finished watching) that we started getting some real information about just what kind of world Ultima Thule is.

First, Rough Picture of Ultima Thule from New Horizon. (Credit: Sky News)

Looking at the first Hi-Resolution image below it is apparent that Ultima Thule is actually two roughly spherical objects that have come together very gently, with no sign of anything like a collision. The team at APL has decided to name the larger, lower ball Ultima and the smaller upper ball Thule.

First Hi-Res Image of Ultima Thule from New Horizons (Credit: APL, NASA)

The physical configuration of Ultima Thule has indicated to APL scientists, led by program manager Alan Stern, to suggest that Ultima Thule formed 4.5 billion years ago exactly as we see it today. Indeed it is thought that back when the solar system was forming there were literally million of small objects very similar to Ultima Thule all the way from where Mercury is now to beyond where Ultima Thule. In the inner solar system those ‘planetoids’ came together to form the planets. Beyond Pluto however the planetoids were so few and the distance between them so great that many remained just as they were, as Ultima Thule is now. The basic idea of how Ultima Thule formed is show in the image below.

Suggested Formation Scheme of Ultima Thule (Credit: APL, NASA)

The first Hi-Res pictures are capable of resolving features on Ultima Thule down to a size of about 150 m but with more data coming in the scientists hope to be able to increase the resolution down to about 40 m or maybe even a little smaller. Nevertheless there are already some features that are clearly seen in the first images, see below. The scientists at APL are especially interest in the ring around where the two lobes meet. By the way the new Hi-Res images have also enabled the scientists to determine that Ultima Thule rotates about once every 15+1 hours.

Features see in Hi-Res Image of Ultima Thule (Credit: APL, NASA)

Now the Hi-Resolution camera on board New Horizons is strictly black and white but we can produce a colour image of Ultima Thule because the data from a low-resolution colour camera can be used to colourize the Hi-Res picture. The image below illustrates how this is done and it turns out that Ultima Thule is reddish in colour.

How the Scientists Colourize the Hi-Res Image of Ultima Thule (Credit: APL, NASA)

In the days to come we’ll be learning more about Ultima Thule as more and more of the data from New Horizons comes in. The probe itself is of course still going, heading out of the solar system following a path set out by the Pioneer and especially the Voyager space probes. The scientists at APL hope that like the Voyagers New Horizons will continue to send back data for 20 or more years, teaching us even more about what is beyond our solar system. See image below.

Future Course of New Horizons, and other Probes beyond the Solar System (Credit: APL, NASA)

Before I go, since this is my first post of 2019 I’ll like to take just a moment to recapitulate 2018 for Science and Science Fiction. There were 102 published posts in all, that’s nearly two every week. 87 posts dealt with science while 14 dealt with SF and there was one post that dealt with the blog itself.

The visitor statistics for Science and Science Fiction improved steadily throughout 2018, thank you all very much. Starting at a little under 500 visits per day in January by December the number of daily visitors had risen to 1400, an increase of about 280%!!

The number of registered subscribers also rose to a total of 8,952. And the people who come to visit or subscribe live throughout the world. Seriously everyday I get comments from places like China or Germany or Hungary or just about any country you’d care to name.

All I can say is that I appreciate all of you who come to my blog in order to learn more about Science and Science Fiction! Thanks again!

As NASA finalizes its plans for a return to the Moon is the Deep Space Gateway an unnecessary and costly complication?

This coming year, 2019 we will celebrate the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11, humanity’s first ever landing on the Moon, the first ever trip to another celestial body. It makes sense therefore to consider NASA’s current plans for manned exploration of space and in particular the current plans, now being finalized for a manned return to the Moon expected to occur in or about the year 2028.

Now when President John F. Kennedy first proposed going to the Moon all of the engineers at NASA, Werner von Braun for example, thought that they’d have to build a rocket big enough to put a spacecraft into orbit that would go directly to the surface of the Moon, land there and later blast off from the Moon to head straight back to Earth. The most simple, uncomplicated approach in other words. The problem was that such a rocket would have been so huge and expensive that it would make the Saturn V look puny in comparison. There were many at NASA who doubted that developing such a rocket was possible in Kennedy’s time frame.

It was Dr. John Houbolt, see image below, of NASA’s planning directorate who advocated for a different plan called ‘Lunar Orbit Rendezvous’ (LOR). In this idea two smaller spacecraft would be sent into orbit around the Moon. One would be a Command and Service Module (CSM) that would sustain the astronauts during their voyage while also having the rocket engine that would send the astronauts back toward Earth. Only the second module, a Lunar Module (LM) would actually set down on Moon. With this approach the size of the actual spacecraft that landed would be much smaller, see image below, and this would make every other component of the mission, all the way back to the big rocket that took off from Earth, much smaller and therefore cheaper as well.

John C. Houbolt Explaining Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (Credit: Public Domain)
Comparison of the Sizes of Lunar Landing Vehicles (Credit: Public Domain)

The problem with Lunar Orbit Rendezvous was the rendezvous part because once the astronauts had blasted back off from the Moon they would have to find and connect up with the CSM in order to get back home to Earth. The idea of two spacecraft in orbit around the Moon finding each other was scary, in 1960-62 no one knew if such a rendezvous was possible in Earth orbit let alone 400,000 km away in Lunar orbit.

Still it looked as if LOR was the only way to meet Kennedy’s deadline and NASA made it work. To the people back on Earth who watched the Apollo landings the astronauts made rendezvousing in lunar orbit seemed like a routine operation.

The Lunar Module in Lunar Orbit Preparing to Rendezvous with the Command and Service Modules (Credit:NASA)

So now NASA is planning to take us back to the Moon, again in about ten years time. This time they already have two major components of the Apollo missions designed, built and nearly ready to begin flight-testing. The Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion crew module, see images below, are obviously updated versions of the Saturn V rocket and Apollo CMS modules. So all that we need is a new, improved Lunar Module, like the one in the image below. Once we’ve developed that we’ll be ready to go right?

NASA’s Space Launch System (Credit: NASA)
The Orion Spacecraft (Credit: DW.com)
Lockheed Martin’s Proposed Lunar Lander (Credit: Space News)

Not so fast, because you see NASA wants to build a space station in lunar orbit before going back down to the surface. This station is know as the Deep Space Gateway and is intended to serve as the rendezvous point for the Orion capsule and a proposed landing module. The Gateway is expected to cost about $20 billion to build and at least another $5 billion to assemble in lunar orbit. The image below shows the planned Deep Space Gateway.

NASA’s Proposed Deep Space Gateway (Credit: NASA)

Now since the Apollo astronauts demonstrated that they could rendezvous in lunar orbit without a station being there you might wonder if the Deep Space Gateway, and the $25 billion it will cost is really necessary, and you won’t be alone in asking that. In fact the National Space Council’s User’s Advisory Group has recommended that the money for Gateway be instead spent on accelerating the development of the lander which could enable NASA to put a man back on the Moon 4-5 years earlier.

So why would NASA want to spend $25 billion or more and delay getting back to the Moon by five years anyway. Well now remember its called the Deep Space Gateway not the Lunar Orbiting Station and it was originally intended to go into an extremely elongated orbit around both the Earth and Moon, an orbit that would take it as far as 5 million kilometers from Earth on voyages lasting a month or more.

In other words the Deep Space Gateway is a stepping-stone to an interplanetary spaceship, a step on the road to Mars. NASA hoped to use the Gateway as a test bed for learning how to operate with astronauts far beyond the Earth orbit for months at a time, experience they will need to begin planning for a manned trip to Mars, and they still hope to do by occasionally putting the Gateway in extremely elongated lunar orbits. In a sense NASA is using the Gateway in order to connect going back to the Moon with going on to Mars!

Personally I want NASA to just concentrate on one mission and get it done. In the past twenty years the ‘next stage of manned spaceflight’ has flipped back and forth from Mars to back to the Moon to an asteroid to back to the Moon. I say let’s just develop a lander and get back to the Moon for real and then think about something like the Deep Space Gateway.

Anyway that’s my opinion, what’s yours?

Eruption at Krakatoa causes Tsunami killing hundreds along coast of Indonesia. Is there more to come?

The island nation of Indonesia is generally considered to be the most volcanically active country in the world. Lying right on the so-called ‘Ring of Fire’ the nation is dotted with some 130 known active volcanoes. Probably the most famous of Indonesia’s volcanoes is Krakatao, a name that has almost become a byword for volcanic destruction. See image below.

Artist’s Impression of the 1883 Eruption of Krakatoa (Credit: Public Domain)

For thousands of years the Krakatoa volcano sat on a small, uninhabited island between the much larger, and heavily populated islands of Java and Sumatra, see image below. The volcano had a long recorded history of eruptions until during the night of 26-27 August of 1883 the Krakatoa volcano exploded with a force of about 200 megatons, four times that of the largest nuclear weapon ever tested. It is estimated that the eruption of 1883 ejected approximately 25 cubic kilometers of rock into the atmosphere destroying the island on which the volcano sat while generating a Tsunami that killed over 36,000 people along the coasts of Java and Sumatra.

Position of Krakatoa (Modern Anak Krakatoa) between Java and Sumatra (Credit: Google)

After that eruption Krakatoa was quiet for a few decades but starting in the 1920s the pressure began to build again and a new island, with a new volcano lifted itself out of the water. Named Anak Krakatoa or child of Krakatoa, see image below, the volcano has been growing steadily at a rate of 13 centimeters a week over the last few decades. The continuous activity of Krakatoa, and its potential to generate further natural disasters has alarmed both geologists and the Indonesian government.

Recent Eruptions of the Anak Krakatoa Volcano have triggered a tsunami spreading destruction across Indonesia (Credit: The Sun Daily)

Just this past week the seismic activity of Krakatoa has again proved deadly as new eruptions on the night of 22 December generated a Tsunami wave as high as 5 meters that struck several villages and tourist resorts on the western end of the island of Java. Unlike the Indonesian tsunami of 2004 that killed a quarter of a million people this tsunami does not appear to have been caused by an underwater earthquake but rather by a landslide of part of the volcano into the ocean, see image below.

Tsunami Caused by Landslide (Credit: University of California, Santa Cruz)

Now you might wonder what difference a landslide makes compares to an earthquake but it turns out that Indonesia’s tsunami warning system is designed to detect earthquakes and missed the landslide completely. Because of this there was absolutely no warning of the waves that have killed at least 400 and wounded several thousand. Another problem is that, since the island formed by Anak Krakatoa is so close to the Java shore even if the tsunami detection system had worked it would have only provided a minute or two of warning to the people in its deadly path.

Eruption of Anak Krakatoa back in July (Credit: Getty)

The recent seismic activity by the Krakatoa volcano will undoubtedly continue, indeed it is very likely to intensify rather than decline. Because of that the deadly eruptions of this past week are certain to have sequels. The people of Indonesia know very well of dangers that come with living in the most geologically active country on Earth. They can only hope that better detection systems based upon more a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of volcanism will allow them to live safer lives in the shadow of Krakatoa.

Paleontology News for December 2018.

There have been quite a few dino discoveries the past few weeks. I have four stories to cover so let’s get to it.

I’ll start with the discovery of a new species of ‘horned dinosaur’ formally known as a Ceratopsian and related to the well-known Triceratops. The new species, see image below, is named Crittendenceratops krzyzanowskii and is based on the re-evaluation of bones that were discovered almost 20 years ago in 73 million year old rocks southeast of Tucson Arizona. A team of researchers from the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (NMMNH) carried out the re-examination finding “morphological features right away in the material of Crittendenceratops to establish a new species,” according to Sebastian Dalman the team leader.

Artists Impression of Crittendenceratops (Credit: Live Science)

According to the researchers, C krzyzanowskii was approximately 3-4 meters in length and likely weighted 700-800 kilos. The 73 million year age of Crittendenceratops puts it very close to the end Cretaceous period, making it probably one of the last species of ‘horned dinosaur’ to walk the Earth.

 

One of the big debates going on presently in the paleontological community concerns exactly when it was that the first feathers developed and how many different types of animals had them. Not too many years ago the very idea of a dinosaur having feathers would have been shocking. Now however it is well established that some dinosaurs worn feathers as insulation to help keep them warm. Perhaps even the mighty T rex himself was covered with a warm layer of fuzzy feathers.

Now an analysis of two fossils may push the origins of feathers back another 70 millions years and spread their occurrence to another entire group of extinct reptiles. A team of paleontologists from Nanjing University in China have found what they believe to be short, fuzzy, thread like structures on specimens of pterosaurs, the bat like flying reptiles that lived at the same time as the dinosaurs, but which were not dinosaurs. The fact that many of these thread like structures, see image below, split at their ends in a fashion similar to the development of feathers leads the researchers, lead by Professor Baoyu Jiang, to conclude that they are in fact the earliest fossil evidence of feathers.

Feathers on Pteranodon Fossils. Splitting at the ends indicates they are Feathers rather than Hair (Credit: Michael Benton / Nature Ecology and Evolution)
Pteranodon with Feathers (Credit: Yuan Zhang / Nature Ecology and Evolution)

The spread of feathers 70 million years further backward in time and to another entire group of extinct reptiles not only illustrates how wondrous the past history of life truly is, but also how piece by piece we are slowly uncovering it.

 

The very first dinosaur specimens to be scientifically described came from the United Kingdom. In fact the very word Dinosaur (Terrible Lizard) was coined by the British naturalist Sir Richard Owen. The paleontology of the UK has been studied for so long, and so thoroughly that you might think that there couldn’t be much left to discover. Erosion can often be a paleontologist’s friend however, revealing treasures that were hidden beneath layers of uninteresting rock.

This is what has happened in the Ashdown Formation in the English county of East Sussex. In the sandstone cliffs along the shore 85 dinosaur footprints have been recently discovered. Not only that but the prints are from as many as 13 different species, giving scientists a glimpse into what the quiet English countryside was like 100-140 million years ago. See image of a print below.

Theropod Dinosaur Footprint from Sussex UK (Credit: University of Cambridge)

The prints include many from well known dinosaurs, the Iguanodon, the Ankylosaurus, a possible Stegosaur as well as several Sauropods and Theropods (Basically that’s all of the dinosaurs you learned about when you were a kid!). Some of the prints are so well preserved that the texture of the animals skin can easily be seen, and therefore studied. See image below. Finds like these give paleontologists a wealth of information about the ecology of the ancient world, showing us how different, and yet how similar the world was so long ago.

Impressions of the Dinosaur’s Skin on Footprint (Credit: University of Cambridge)

 

My final story today may not be the most important scientifically but it is almost certainly the most spectacular. At least it has the coolest picture, see image below.

Artist’s Impression of a Shark attacking a Pteranodon (Credit: Mark Witton)

Researchers at the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum have been cleaning and preparing a well-preserved skeleton of a Pteranodon, a large species of those flying reptiles I mentioned above. As the researchers were cleaning the area of the fossil’s neck they noticed something stuck in between two vertebra, a shark’s tooth! See image below.

Shark’s Tooth, red arrow, Embedded in the neck of a Pteranodon Fossil (Credit: Stephanie Abramowicz, David Hone, Los Angeles County Natural History Museum)

Now the researchers do not believe that the shark, the tooth identifies it as a species known as Cretoxyrhina mantelli, leapt out of the water in order to attack the Pteranodon in mid flight. Rather they speculate that the flying reptile was floating on the surface of the ocean when the shark ambushed it from below. Even today sharks are known to attack seabirds in this manner, I’ve actually witnessed such an attack myself. So have sharks been feeding for millions of years off of flying animals who are foolish enough think that the ocean is a nice, quiet place to rest for a few minutes? By the way, this fossil Pteranodon was actually  discovered back in the 1960s. Another example of how a re-examination can make new finds.

The fossils found by the researchers in California give us a small window into a past event that is both dramatic and fascinating. With each such window we gain a better picture of the history of life on Earth.

An Update on Gun Violence in the USA, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) announces a large increase in Deaths Caused by Guns in 2017.

Back in February I published a two-part post looking at gun violence in the United States and how it compares to that in other countries. (See my posts of 21 and 24 February 2018) Now this last week the Center for Disease Control (CDC) has released their statistics for US gun violence in the year 2017 so I’d like to take a chance to look at the new figures.

Not surprisingly the number of Americans killed grew once again to a total of 39,773, up more than a thousand from 38,658 in 2016. Adjusting for age, in 2017 12 Americans out of every 100,000 died by firearm in 2017 the highest rate since 1979, 40 years ago. In fact if you look at the pie chart shown in the image below you’ll see that the United States had the second highest total of gun related deaths of any nation on Earth, behind only Brazil.

Gun Deaths around the World (Credit: CNN)

Now in a sense comparing total gun deaths isn’t fair since Mexico, Columbia, Venezuela and Guatemala all have smaller populations making their rate of deaths caused by guns much higher. Still, it’s an eerie thought that only six countries account for half of the gun deaths in the entire world, and they’re all in the Western Hemisphere!

Now while I was doing my analysis of gun violence back in February I freely admitted that I was shocked to discover that suicides outnumbered homicides by a wide margin. The data from 2017 continues that trend with 23,854 people killing themselves with a gun as opposed to 15,919 people being killed by someone else. 60% of the total gun deaths are in fact suicides.

If we take a closer look at the demographic breakdown of the suicides in the US, see image below, we quickly discover another shocking fact. The number of suicides among white men, 18,759 is more than three times the number, 5095, for all other demographic groups combined, 79% of the total. Now it is true that white men are a large demographic group here in the US making up 30% of the entire population but that still means that they are killing themselves at almost nine times the rate of the rest of the American population.

Suicides across Demographic Groups (Credit: CNN)

Now taking a look at the breakdown of the homicides, see image below, we find another shocker. Here it is black men who are by far the largest number of victims. Last year 7,661 black men were gunned down compared to 8,258 for all other groups combined, 48% of the total number. In 2017 a black male was approximately six times more likely to be murdered than someone from another demographic group.

Homicides across Demographic Groups (Credit: CNN)

Statistics like these cry out for explanation, demand that somebody do something. The obvious fact that our horribly high rates of suicide and murder are so concentrated in only two demographic groups means that there are social problems unique to those groups. Problems that, if they are found and studied can be reduced if not eliminated entirely. The suicide rate in particular is obviously a mental health issue that begs for a non-political solution.

At the present time however federal agencies like the CDC are legally being prevented from studying gun violence by lawmakers. These so-called leaders are supported by the gun industry and therefore refuse to even consider any sensible approach to reducing gun violence.

First and foremost we need to allow our nation’s best scientific minds to study the problem of gun violence in this country. Only then will we have any chance of giving the people of the United States freedom from gun violence.

A Comprehensive New Study finds that there are massive amounts of Microbial life deep within the interior of the Earth.

We always seem to think of life here on Earth as residing on the surface of our planet. After all life is dependent on the Sun for its energy so even if the depths of the oceans are populated by life certainly living things can’t survive very far below the actual surface of the planet. A new study challenges that idea, finding instead that single celled microbial forms of life live very happily many kilometers deep with the Earth’s interior.

The study is being conducted by the Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO), an international team from 52 counties of geologists, biologists, chemists and physicists. For the last ten years the scientists have been surveying deep mining operations as well as conducting drilling operations in order to get a statistical sample of the amount and kinds of life many kilometers beneath our feet. See image below of the sites worldwide that have been studied by the team.

Sites Around the World Studied by The Deep Carbon Observatory (Credit: DCO)
The DCO used vessels like the Japanese Survey Ship Chikyu to explore life deep UNDER the Oceans (Credit: JAMSTEC)

What they found is astounding, the current estimate of the mass of the life deep inside the Earth is between 245 and 385 times the mass of all the human beings on the surface, all 7 billion of us. More than that, the number of unknown species lying hidden beneath our feet must number in the tens if not hundreds of thousands or more. According to Karen Lloyd, a microbiologist at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville and member of the DCO team the study’s results “force us to reimagine what the boundaries are that life can exist in!” The images below show just a small sample of the kinds of life the team found deep underground.

Microbe Canadidatus Desulforudis found 2.8 km below surface in gold mine near Johannesburg S. Africa (Credit:Greg Wanger)
Methanobacterium found 2km below the Ocean floor off east coast of Japan (Credit: JAMSTEC)

The conditions under which these microbial creatures survive are also amazing. Temperatures as high as 130ºC, that’s 30 degrees above the boiling point of water, acidic sulfur infused water along with pressures 400 times greater than that at sea level, all in the complete absence of oxygen. Is it any wonder that space scientists are interested in the deep carbon study as it gives them so much information about the extreme environments that life can survive, conditions that could mirror those on other planets.

If you’ll allow me however I’m going to take a different tack. Because of course we also know that bacteria and other simple microbial life are all over that potion of the Earth we more naturally consider life’s domain as well. We’ve been told since childhood that almost every surface we touch is covered with bacteria. That’s why we need to wash our hands often. Worse than that, we also know that bacteria are living on our own skin, in our mouths and in our guts.

If fact a recent paper by Doctor Ron Sender of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel estimates that while the average human body contains 30 trillion cells it also plays host to an average of 39 trillion bacteria. Now a bacterium is much smaller than a human cell, see image below, but nevertheless Dr. Sender estimates than for a normal adult between 1 and 3 kilos of their body mass is made up of bacterial parasites.

General Human Cell with Bacteria for Comparison (Credit: Dreamstime)

The same is even truer of every animal, every plant we share our world with, to say nothing of all the blue-green algae in all of the world’s pond, lakes and oceans. And every farmer knows that the measure of the fertility of soil is the amount of living bacteria in it. I guess we simply have to face the fact that the world’s single celled microbial life not only greatly outnumber we so-called advanced forms of life, they probably outweigh us by several times as well.

Or to put it another way; two to three billion years ago all of the life on Earth consisted of simple, single celled microbial organisms and things really haven’t changed much since then!

Book Review: Planetfall by Emma Newman.

Emma Newman is a British Fantasy and SF writer and podcaster. Nominated for a British Fantasy Award as best newcomer in 2014 she already has published the urban-fantasy series ‘The Split Worlds’ along with the SF Novels ‘Planetfall’ and ‘Before Atlas’ which was nominated for a Clarke Award in 2017.

Author Emma Newman at a book signing (Credit: Joe’s Geek fest)

The novel ‘Planetfall’ takes place sometime in the not too distant future, in a human colony on a distant, unnamed world some twenty years after the colonist’s arrival, twenty years after planetfall in other words.

The colony was founded by Lee Suh-Mi, a self styled ‘pathfinder’ (Read Messiah) who ‘knew’ that god was waiting on the planet for human beings to come and be with him (her?, it?). Lee Suh-Mi, Suh to her followers, has not been seen since planetfall, she is communing with god in god’s city the colonists have been told. God’s city is an alien structure not far from where the colonists have built their settlement. Here they have been waiting twenty years for the ‘Pathfinder’ to return with god’s message to them.

Renata Ghali, ‘Ren’ is the colony’s manufacturing engineer, that is she takes care of the colony’s 3-D printers that produce everything the colonists require right down to their food. Ren was Suh’s roommate and lover and was present when, back on Earth Suh ate the alien plant that caused her to begin having visions of god.

Not an Alien Plant but it sure looks like one (Credit: Io9-Gizmodo)

Cillian Mackenzie ‘Mack’ is the colony’s leader, who has kept the colonists together even after the disaster at planetfall that led to several of the colony’s members becoming lost and presumed dead. Problem is it’s all a lie and Mack and Ren are the only one’s who know the truth.

Right at the start we learn that Ren is not strong psychologically, she has mother issues and was pretty much dependent on Suh even before they ever left Earth. Now however the strain of keeping the lies is really taking its toll on Ren.

Half the fun of ‘Planetfall’ is trying to figure out just what is going on! What happened back at planetfall and just what are all of Ren’s problems? Author Emma Newman does a very good giving you clues here and there so that, as in a mystery novel, you’re soon caught up trying to put all the pieces together.

I think I did pretty well. I figured out what Ren’s big problem was and the hidden cause of it. I also had a good idea of what had happened at planetfall. The climax at the ending however caught me completely by surprise; I never saw it coming. Writers are often told that you want the climax of your novel to be ‘totally unexpected and completely inevitable’. In ‘Planetfall’ Emma Newman succeeds very well in that goal.

‘Planetfall’ isn’t prefect by any means however. The middle sags a bit as it becomes so dominated by Ren’s mental problems that you lose sight of the main plot. Cutting out maybe ten pages worth of groaning and moaning would be a bit of an improvement. Then at the very end as Ren passes the alien ‘tests’ that Suh failed you can’t quite believe it, she’s been such a neurotic mess the entire novel after all.

I may be a little biased toward liking ‘Planetfall’ because I’ve been working on a novel idea about a group of religious ‘pilgrims’ traveling into outer space in order to pursue their vision of god for a long time. Still ‘Planetfall’ is a well-crafted SF mystery that, once you get started you’ll have to finish in order to not only find out how the story ends, but how it started as well!

After Atlas is Emma Newman’s followup to Planetfall (Credit: Amazon)