Space Race: The Gemini and Soyuz Programs. America takes the Lead.

This is the Fourth installment of a series of articles leading up to the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 and humanity’s first landing on the Moon. In these articles I will reminisce about some of the most important milestones on the journey that led to Apollo 11, some of the best known events in the Space Race.

In the third installment I discussed how despite initially lagging behind Soviet Union in rocket power the United States scored some very important early successes in the development of communications satellites such as the revolutionary Telstar satellite. I described how it was the United States’ superiority in electronics, especially in the use of solid-state transistors, which allowed the US to ‘do more with less’.

In this post I will return to my discussion of manned spaceflight and the first spacecraft to carry more than one person at a time. Of course it was the Russians who went first with their Voskhod spacecraft.

The Voskhod capsule, see image below, was simply a modification of the earlier Vostok single man spacecraft that had launched Yuri Gagarin as the first man into space. Now modifying any complex machine to do twice the job it was designed for it a risky business but Voskhod 1, launched on 12 October 1964, may very well have been the most dangerous manned mission in history. Not only did the capsule carry three men but because of the cabin’s space was so cramped the cosmonauts couldn’t even wear spacesuits!

The Voskhod 1 Spacecraft being prepared for launch (Credit: Roscosmos)

Launched on March 18th 1965, Voskhod 2 was hardly any safer. It may have only carried a crew of two but it also had to find room for an airlock, see image below, so that cosmonaut Alexi Leonov could become the first human being to perform an Extra-Vehicular Activity or EVA, often known as taking a spacewalk.

Voskhod 2 with its inflatable airlock extended and Cosmonaut preforming an EVA (Credit: Capcom Espace)
Alexi Leonov Performs the First Spacewalk outside the Voskhod 2 (Credit: Roscosmos)

Walking in space was to be the last time the Soviet Union would score a space first for the United States was about to begin its Gemini program. Although similar in concept to the Mercury capsule unlike Voskhod   the Gemini spacecraft was a completely  new design intended for more than simply carrying multiple passengers.

The Gemini Spacecraft (Credit: NASA)

You see NASA was thinking ahead to the activities that astronauts would be required to conduct for its planned Moon mission. Three critical abilities had been identified as essential for the success of that undertaking:

1: The ability to survive a long duration spaceflight, 10 days at least.

2: The ability to perform EVAs and carry out useful work during them, after all you’re not going to go all the way to the Moon and then stay in your spaceship are you.

3: The ability to locate another spacecraft in orbit and then rendezvous and dock with it, NASA’s plan for the Moon mission involved using a separate Lunar Module for the actual landing while the main Apollo Command and Service Modules remained in Lunar orbit.

The entire Gemini program was planned with the intention of determining if those activities were even possible in the environment of space.

The first Gemini launch, Gemini 3 came on 23 March 1965, just five days after Russia’s Voskhod 2, and 10 Gemini missions were carried out over the next 20 months. Gemini 4’s co-pilot Ed White carried out the first American EVA while Buzz Aldren on Gemini 12 proved that astronauts could perform useful work while outside their ship.

Astronaut Ed White making first American space walk, 120 miles above the Pacific Ocean. (Credit: NASA)

The crew of Gemini 7 undertook the longest duration mission of the program, 14 days, a record that stood for the next five years. Meanwhile Gemini 6 succeeded in the first orbital rendezvous by using Gemini 7 as its target, see image below.

Gemini 7 as seen from Gemini 6 (Credit: NASA)

It was Neil Armstrong and Gene Scott in Gemini 8 who succeeded in the first rendezvous and docking of two spacecraft in orbit using an unmanned Agena booster as their target. See image below.

Gemini 8. The First Space Docking is only Moments away! (Credit: NASA)

By the completion of the Gemini program American astronauts had both accomplished and refined all of the essential activities they would need to complete a lunar mission. The men of NASA were ready, now they had only to wait for their spacecraft.

Meanwhile, as the US was carrying out the entire Gemini program the Russians launched no manned spacecraft. Their Chief Designer Sergei Korolev had pushed his basic Vostok-R7 design as far as it could go and so a totally new design that would become the Soyuz spacecraft was developed.

The first flight of Soyuz came on 23 April 1967 and ended in catastrophe as Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov died during the spacecraft’s landing. Because of this disaster Soviet cosmonauts would not conduct a successful rendezvous and docking of two spacecraft until January of 1969, only 6 months before America would land on the Moon.

A failure of its Parachutes led to a deadly crash land of the Soyuz 1 spacecraft (Credit: Roscosmos)

Perhaps an even worse disaster for the Russians however may have been the death on 14 January 1966 of the chief designer himself. Sergei Korolev, whose health had never really recovered from 6 years labouring in a prison camp due to Stalin’s paranoia, had finally worked himself to death.

The Death of Sergei Korolev in 1967 had a major impact on the Soviet Space Program (credit: Roscosmos)

The Gemini program had given the United States a lead in the space race but only time would tell if the hardware for the Apollo program could be delivered in time and be capable of completing the mission.

Donald Trump and his 2020 (lack of a) Science Budget

The President’s requested budget for the US Federal government for the fiscal year 2020 has been released and, to put it mildly it’s a punch in the gut to the advancement of science in this country. The good news is that it is the US Congress who actually has the power to pass a budget and the President’s funding request is really just a suggestion. However the proposed budget does illustrate how appropriate funding for science, and the direct relation of science to our nation’s security and prosperity are being lost in the partisan bickering that has become what we call government.

Now the US government, instead of having a single department of science, splits the funding for scientific programs into several different departments. These include some of the government’s best known agencies such as NASA and the National Institute of Health (NIH) along the National Science Foundation (NSF).

The Three Federal Agencies most involved in the Advancement of Science (Credit:, NASA, NSF, NIH)

Then there are other agencies which conduct scientific activities in addition to their other work such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In these agencies determining what work can be considered advancing science and what is regulatory or dealing with national defense can be tricky so I’ll examine the two groups separately.

Starting with NASA the chart below shows a breakdown of the proposed 2020 budget. Now I admit the chart has a lot in it and it’s difficult to really understand what going on but remember we are only concerned with the two columns 2019 (this year) and 2020 (the proposed budget) and we’ll look at one line item at a time. By the way the blue lines are major budget areas with the white lines beneath them efforts broken out from the major area above.

President Trump’s Proposed 2020 Budget for NASA (Credit: NASA)

Starting at the top the ‘Deep Space Exploration Systems’ is the Space Launch System (SLS) and other programs for human exploration beyond Earth orbit. Comparing the numbers for 2019, $5.05 billion and 2020, $5.021 Billion, you can see that about $29 million is going to be taken away from this effort. That’s a reduction of only 0.5% so it’s not too bad. Still considering all the delays and budget problems the SLS has had over the last few years adding yet one more difficulty can’t really be a good thing.

The Space Launch System has already been delayed several times by budget concerns. (Credit: Boeing)

Let’s drop down to the line called ‘LEO and Spaceflight Operations’. Now LEO stands for Low Earth Orbit and this line item includes manning and maintaining the International Space Station (ISS) along with getting astronauts back and forth to the ISS. We see that the proposed 2020 funding is $4.285 billion, a reduction of 9.2% from the 2019 funding of $4.639 Billion. That’s a substantial reduction and illustrates NASA’s growing desire to step back from its commitment to the ISS and turn over space efforts in LEO to commercial companies like Boeing, Space X along with others such as Bigelow aerospace.

Continuing down the next blue line we come to the Science line item which includes both interplanetary probes as well as those satellites that are studying the Earth from orbit. The cutbacks here are also very large, from $6.905 Billion in 2019 to only $6.303 Billion in 2020, a reduction of 9.1%. Once again the implication is that the Trump administration, insofar as it cares about space at all, cares only about manned spaceflight.

The Cassini Probe to Saturn is only one of the robotic missions that have taught us so much about our solar system (Credit: NASA)
The Upcoming Psyche Spaceprobe could be delayed or even canceled due to Trump’s Budget Cuts. (Credit: NASA / JPL)

Before moving on to the other departments in our government I’d just like to point out one small line item, STEM engagement. As many of you may know STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math and STEM engagement is NASA’s efforts to help promote STEM education in our schools. Obviously the Trump administration doesn’t approve of trying to encourage our young people to aspire to careers in STEM because the entire line item has been cut from the 2020 budget, a 100% reduction!

 

So now let’s move on to proposed budget for the National Institute of Heath, which is an agency with the Department of Health and Human Services. Now you’d think that with the current problems the US is having with such medical issues as opioid abuse and suicide along with traditional diseases like cancer and heart disease that the NIH would at the very least be receiving a small increase in budget. And let’s not forget that recent statistics have shown that life expectancy in the US is actually going down for the first time in over a hundred years. Obviously there’s a lot of work for our health care professionals to do right now but apparently the Trump Administration doesn’t feel that way. The 2020 proposed budget cuts spending on the NIH by 4.5 billion or 11%.

The National Science Foundation, which funds so much of the pure research carried out in this country also takes a major hit in the proposed budget. The proposed budget is $7.1 Billion in 2020, a decrease of $1 Billion or 12% from 2019. This cutback clearly illustrates the shortsighted ignorance of those to prefer ‘practical’, ‘useful’ science as opposed to basic research without recognizing that ‘practical’ science cannot even begin without the foundation provided by basic research.

Much of the Basic Science carried out in the USA is funded by the National Science Foundation (Credit: Illinois College)

I’ve saved the worst for last, because what the Trump administration has proposed for the Environmental Protection Agency is nothing less than a deliberate abandonment of any and all responsibility for how we treat our planet. The 2020 budget request of $6.1 billion represents fully a 31% cut from the EPA’s funding for 2019.

With all of the pollution we’ve dumping into the Environment only a madman would cut the budget for the EPA! (Credit: Kiwi Report)

This lack of concern for the health of the planet on which we live is very much is keeping with Trump’s attitude we can do whatever we want to the environment without suffering any consequences. The reality is however that every day we see more and more evidence that we are already suffering for our mismanagement of the Earth and the consequences are only going to increase in both magnitude and quantity if we don’t wake up and start behaving responsibly.

And that’s the real danger of the Trump administration’s proposed 2020 budget for science, because without science we won’t have the knowledge we need in order to know how to behave responsibly. After all science is just the Latin word for knowledge.

Trump however has throughout his life always chosen to exploit the ignorance and greed of those around him so the cutbacks in science make perfect sense, to him. For the rest of us however, an America without a commitment to science is an America that has lost its greatness.

Which is real, the Dangers of Vaccines or the Dangers of Measles and other childhood Diseases?

Nowadays you often hear people say something like, “I had measles and all those other childhood diseases when I was a kid. They don’t do any real harm and aren’t those vaccines even more dangerous. Besides, I just don’t trust those drug companies.”

Let’s take those assertions, because that’s what they are, assertions without any supporting evidence, one at a time. Measles, mumps and rubella, also known as German measles, are considered childhood diseases only because they are so infectious and widespread that nearly everyone is exposed and infected at a young age. Still, if you manage to avoid exposure as a child you can catch any of them as an adult. Right now here in Philadelphia there is an outbreak of mumps amongst the 18-21 year old students at Temple University.

When someone is infected with Measles it’s not too heard to spot (Credit: CBS News)
Mumps is also pretty easy to diagnose (Credit: West Chester County Department of Health)

As far as childhood diseases causing no real harm, well I can tell you personally that’s a load of bleep. I am practically deaf in my right ear thanks to the mumps I had as a child but compared to many people I was actually lucky. You see statistically about 1 out of every 500 people who contract measles will die due to complications, that’s about 73,000 people worldwide every year. Mumps are less deadly; only one person in 10,000 will die, but still is it worth running the risk if you don’t have to?

That’s because there is absolutely no reason to take the risk. The MMR vaccine (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) is so effective, greater than 95%, that if an entire population gets vaccinated the three diseases simply cannot take hold and spread. Another few statistics will illustrate how true that is. Before the first measles vaccine vaccine was introduced in 1963 the number of US citizens who contacted the disease each year was in the hundreds of thousands! That means more then a thousand dying each year! After the MMR vaccine was introduced that number quickly dropped to only 66 reported cases in 2005 with no reported deaths at all.

Number of cases of Measles in the US before and after introduction of Measles Vaccine (Credit: Wikipedia)

So why are we still talking about this? Why do I even have to write a blog post describing the dangers of measles, mumps and rubella? Aren’t people intelligent enough to realize the threat of these diseases and how easy it is to protect themselves with a simple vaccine? You have to wonder why any sensible person would refuse to be vaccinated, why they would choose to risk their children’s health by refusing to have them vaccinated.

Recently of course there has been a large increase in the number of people who oppose vaccination because of misinformation and all too often downright lies. Much of this propaganda campaign began back in 1998 when a British medical researcher named Andrew Wakefield published a paper in which he linked the MMR vaccine to both Colitis and Autism in children. Even though there was criticism from other researchers almost immediately the article was widely discussed in the media and the seeds planted for what would become a global conspiracy theory.

In fact the paper was worse then simply bad science. An investigative journalist named Brian Deer soon uncovered evidence that Wakefield had received over £400,000 from several attorneys who were actively suing the manufacturers of the MMR vaccine and that several of the cases mentioned in the paper were clients of those attorneys. Not only that but Wakefield himself was trying to patent a rival vaccine to MMR.

So it’s hardly surprising that Wakefield was later found to have manipulated his patient’s data committing what has been called “perhaps the most damaging medical hoax in the last 100 years.” The original paper has been completely withdrawn by the journal that published it and Wakefield’s license to practice medicine in the UK has been revoked.

The Scandal over the anti-vaccine “Study” has made headlines around the World (Credit: The Sunday Times)

That’s all just a big conspiracy; say those people who see conspiracies everywhere. The big drug companies are suppressing the truth in order to preserve their big profits! (Actually drug companies don’t make much money off of vaccines that people only take once. The vast majority of drug profits come from people with chronic conditions like high cholesterol who have to take a pill every day for the rest of their lives.)

In addition there are those people whose children are autistic and who feel the very human need to find something, or someone to blame. If your child is ill and you don’t know why, the causes of autism are still largely unknown; it’s easy to accuse people who appear to be better off than you are.

All of which has led to a growing number of parents, often well-educated and genuinely concerned about their children, deciding that the danger of measles is less than the risk of the vaccines. It’s all a position driven by fear and once fear enters an argument logic and evidence are powerless to fight against it.

Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin admits he exposed his unvaccinated children to Chicken Pox, a relative of Small Pox(!!!) because he believes vaccines are harmful to children!  I consider that evidence of how harmful parents can be to children! (Credit: New York Post)

And so we now have outbreaks of an easily preventable disease in nearly all developed countries. Real children are becoming sick by a real disease in order to protect them from an imagined danger. In the long run enough people will get sick, and some people will die, so that we become reminded of the very real threat of diseases like measles. When that happens vaccine rates will go back up, but in the meantime, what a waste of human life!

Movie Review: Captain Marvel

Well the Marvel Comics Universe (MCU) is alive and well with its latest installment, Captain Marvel. After its second weekend Disney’s latest superhero movie has raked in about three quarters of a billion $USD worldwide and seems poised to go over the billion mark very soon.

Captain Marvel Poster (Credit: Disney / Marvel)

Captain Marvel is important to the Disney / Marvel Comics collaboration for several reasons beyond just money however. Recently several of the actors who portray some of the most popular superheroes have publicly announced that they are growing tired of their rolls, Robert Downey jr. / Ironman and Chris Evans / Captain America being the two best known. That means that the MCU is going to need a new franchise superhero to pick up some of the slack.

The Original Avengers (Credit: Disney / Marvel)

Then there’s the gender issue, Captain Marvel is Marvel’s first attempt at a superhero movie centered around a female character. Now Marvel has tried to develop several female superheroes, Scarlett Johansen / Black Widow and Elisabeth Olsen / Scarlet Witch for example. However neither of these characters has proven to be strong enough for a stand alone movie, they are really second tier superheroes, and I really hate to say that about Scarlett.

The MCU has really been built on a foundation of four very male characters: Ironman, Captain American, Thor and the Hulk and now adding in Spiderman, Doctor Strange and perhaps most importantly Black Panther. Captain Marvel represents Disney / Marvel’s best shot at a stand alone female world saver who can also hold her own with the boys!

Captain Marvel looks like she’s ready to do just that. The story is set back in the 1990s with Carol Danvers (Actress Brie Larson) training to become one of the US Airforce’s first female pilots. Without giving away too many details of the plot she looses her memory and becomes a warrior for an alien race called the Kree. While chasing the enemy of the Kree she is stranded on Earth where she meets Shield Agent Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson). Together they recover Danvers memory, rescue a source of immense power and beat the real bad guys, all while releasing the powers of Captain Marvel that the source of power has placed in Danvers.

Brie Larsen as Captain Marvel (l.) and Carol Danvers (r.) (Credit Disney / Marvel)
Samuel Jackson as a young Nick Fury in Captain Marvel (Credit: Disney / Marvel)

As in any Disney / MCU movie the special effects are state of the art, even those that make Jackson look 20-25 years younger. The acting is also quite good; although of course superhero movies don’t require Oscar caliber dramatics. The focus in Captain Marvel obviously is on Larson who does manage to stand out amongst more experienced actors like Jackson, Jude Law and Annette Benning. Throughout the movie Larson has a nice way of showing determination rather than rage that to my mind makes her a stronger image than some male actors who think that roaring like a gorilla is the best way to show their emotion, think Sylvester Stallone in Rambo.

And that’s important because remember this is Marvel’s first female centered superhero movie; they need to get it right. O’k DC got it right with Wonder Women, but one example of a women centered superhero movie could just be a fluke, a token female success.

DC has had better Success with its Female Superhero, Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, than their men (Credit: Warner Bros. / DC)

And there is one scene in particular where Captain Marvel really does get it right. Early on in the film we are shown a bit of Carol Danvers childhood. We see her getting knocked down at the plate by a pitched ball, see her having an accident while driving a go-cart, see her loosing her grip while climbing a rope. Then, at the movie’s climax the bad guy gets inside Captain Marvel’s head, reminding her of all of her failures, telling her she can’t hack it, that she isn’t strong enough, isn’t good enough.

But in Captain Marvel’s mind we see that after each of those failures little Carol Danvers got right back up and tried again. That’s the message of Captain Marvel; when you get knocked down get back up! And it doesn’t matter what sex you are; get back up!

O’k, this is just a superhero movie, it’s not meant to be profound or to try and change the world, but a lot of young woman are going to go see this movie and I think that they’ll get the message.

Anthropologists have discovered an entirely new Chimpanzee Culture and I’ll bet you didn’t even know that Chimps had Culture.

Sixty years ago the very idea of that Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, living in different areas of Africa could have different cultures seemed simply ridiculous. After all in order to even have a culture requires either the production of manufactured items that can differ from one group to another or complex social interactions, like a language, that again can show differences between groups. Chimpanzees, so the thinking went, neither made things nor did their various hoots and growls amount to anything more than simple alarums or warnings.

We’ve learned a lot since then and it all began when Jane Goodall was the first to observe a chimpanzee using a twig to get termites out of a nest in order to eat them. (See my posts of 11Nov17 and 21Mar18). This was the first ever observation of tool use by Chimpanzees but was quickly followed by numerous other observations of them using a range of tools. However, because Goodall concentrated all of her observations on a single-family group of chimpanzees she missed the fact that chimpanzees do things differently in different parts of Africa, that P troglodytes possessed culture.

The First Use of Tools by Chimpanzees was using a stick to ‘fish’ for termites (Credit: Seeker)

For example only the chimpanzees of West Africa use stone and wood as hammers in order to crack nuts while in central Africa chimps have been observed to use clubs to open up beehives. Other cultural differences include different styles of nest construction, chimpanzees make a new bed of leaves every night, along with behaviors such as stone piling and algae scooping.

Chimpanzee using a rock to break open a nut (Credit: Phys.Org)
In order to maintain a Culture of course you have to teach it to your Children (Credit: Earth in Transition)

Now researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI-EVA) and the University of Warsaw have discovered a new ‘behavioral realm’, a new cultural unit located in the Bili-Uĕrĕ region of northern Democratic Republic of Congo. The area encompassed in this new ‘behavioral realm’ is estimated at some 50,000 square kilometers but could extend further. The announcement, in a paper published in the journal Folia Primatologica is the result of twelve years of study in the field; some discoveries take a long time and require a careful examination of the evidence.

The Area of the DR Congo where the New Chimpanzee Culture was discovered (Credit: Thurston C. Hicks et al)

Some of the differences are striking, such as whereas most chimp populations use twigs to ‘fish’ for the common termite Macrotermes muelleri, the Bili-Uĕrĕ chimps prefer to use stones and clubs to pound open the nests of the species Thoracotermes macrothorax. In fact the Bili-Uĕrĕ chimps seem to prefer pounding things in general, such as using stones on snail shells and even tortoises, behavior never before observed in chimpanzees. The scientists hope that by learning more about how chimpanzees develop their different cultures they may succeed in better understanding how it was that the first human cultures came into being.

Chimpanzees use a variety of different tolls for different jobs (Credit: Discover Magazine)

As exciting as this new discovery is there’s a danger here that has nothing whatsoever to do with the study of anthropology. The Democratic Republic of the Congo is currently mired in a bitter civil war that has taken the lives of tens of thousands of people. Yet even while the bloodshed continues there is a destructive exploitation of the jungle underway that threatens to exterminate the chimpanzees in Bili-Uĕrĕ even as their distinctive culture is being studied.

As co-author and director of the Department of Primatology at MPI-EVA Christophe Boesch put it. “It is great to have found these fascinating behavioral traits in this population. We simply hope that the many threats they face won’t wipe out these chimpanzees just as we are learning more about their uniqueness.”

 

Post Script: I’d like to update a story from just last week about the test mission of the Space X crew Dragon capsule. After five days attached to the International Space Station (ISS) the Dragon capsule undocked from the ISS and reentered Earth’s atmosphere, splashing down in the Atlantic Ocean about 450 km from the Cape Canaveral launch pad from which it had taken off six days earlier. While the reentry and splashdown appeared to go flawlessly NASA and Space X will still review all of the data over the next few months. Currently the plan is for the first actual manned mission to the ISS for the Dragon to take place in July. I’ll keep you up to date!

Splashdown of the Space X Crew Dragon Capsule (Credit: NASA)

 

Telstar and the Revolution brought about by Communications Satellites.

This is the third installment of a series of articles leading up to the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 and humanity’s first landing on the Moon. In these articles I will reminisce about some of the most important milestones on the journey that led to Apollo 11, some of the best known events in the Space Race.

In the second installment I discussed how the Soviet Union and the USA had successfully launched the first astronauts into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) demonstrating that human beings could live and work in space. I also mentioned how a challenge from the US President Kennedy to ‘land a man on the Moon and return him safely to Earth” had given the new ‘Space Race’ a measurable finish line.

In this post I’d like to discuss the first series of experiments in what has undoubtedly become the most commercially valuable sector of the space industry, communication satellites or Comsats. Now I should warn you, I spent a good part of my career designing and developing the equipment for communications satellites and their associated ground stations so I trust that you’ll forgive me if I become a bit enthusiastic on the subject.

The very idea of using man made satellites in orbit above the Earth as relay stations passing radio messages across the oceans from one continent to another was the brain child of the well known science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke. Clarke’s article ‘Extraterrestrial Relays’ in the October 1945 issue of the radio technology journal ‘Wireless World’. Such relays, Clarke maintained, could relay thousands of telephone calls and perhaps even TV signals across the world.

The First Page of Extra-Terrestrial Relays by Arthur C. Clarke (Credit: Wireless World)

Below is a PDF of the entire article.

Extra-Terrestrial Relays2

Clarke’s idea was for a series of satellites at a distance of 35,700 km above Earth’s equator. This orbit is now known at Geostationary because at that distance and location the satellite would orbit the Earth exactly once everyday and appear to always remain at the same point in the sky. So important has this orbit become that it is often referred to as the Clarke orbit!

Some of the Satellites currently in the Geostationary (Clark) Orbit (Credit: Space Exploration Stack Exchange)

The first attempt at using a satellite to relay a radio signal was by the United States with their Pioneer 1 Lunar spacecraft, launched on 11October 1958. Pioneer 1failed in its mission to reach the Moon but it did achieve a high enough orbit for NASA to use it to relay a radio signal from Cape Canaveral to Manchester England. However Pioneer 1 could only relay one simple radio signal at a time, nowhere near the thousands of messages that Clarke envisioned.

On August 12th 1960 NASA launched the experimental Echo 1 Comsat. Echo was really nothing more than a 30m diameter aluminized balloon that would simply reflect radio signals aimed at it back to receiving stations in other parts of the World, hence the name Echo. Being so large and reflective Echo was easily visible in the night sky and was actually the first satellite I ever saw moving across the night’s sky.

Inflation Test of the Echo Satellite (Credit: NASA)

These first attempts at communications satellites may have taught the scientists and engineers a great deal but the equipment on those early satellites simply did not have the power and capacity to make a real impact in the way the world communicated. That all changed with Telstar.

For one thing Telstar was designed and funded by a consortium of communications companies including AT&T and Bell Telephone in the US along with GPO in the United Kingdom and PTT in France. In fact Telstar was the first object to be put into space owned and operated by private companies, even the launch was privately funded.

Telstar 1 communications satellite, 1962 (replica). Made by Bell Systems. (Credit: Space Museum Group Collection)

The shape of Telstar, see image above, was basically a globe some 87 cm in diameter and the satellite spun in order to maintain stability. The surface of the globe was covered in solar cells that provided 16 watts of electrical power but around the equator were two rows of small ‘horn’ antennas. The larger horns were tuned to a frequency of 4 Giga-Hertz (GHz), which is 4 billion cycles per second, while the small horns were tuned to 6 GHz.

Weighing just 77kg Telstar was crammed full of the latest technology of the time including an innovative electronic subsystem called a ‘transponder’. The transponder was an assembly that carried out several radio operations in a single device. The transponder received signals from the 6Ghz horns, down-converted those signals to 4Ghz, amplified those signals using an electronic device known as a Traveling Wave Tube (TWT) before transmitting it out of the 4Ghz horn antennas. Today Comsats are often judged by the capacity of their transponder(s) and Telstar’s transponder allowed it to relay either 2,000 telephone calls or one television channel.

Because it had to operate all of its equipment off of only 16 watts the signals coming back down from the satellite were very weak and required large, specially built antennas. The US antenna for Telstar was built at Andover Maine; see below, while the British antenna was at Goonhilly Downs in Southwest England and the French built theirs at Pleumeur-Bodou in Northwestern France.

Telstar Ground Antenna at Andover Maine (Credit: Bell Systems)

Telstar I was launched from Cape Canaveral on July 10, 1962 and the very next day the first ever transoceanic TV picture, an American Flag outside the Andover site, was transmitted as a test signal. This was a non-public test of Telstar’s equipment however and it wasn’t until two weeks later on July 23rd that Europa and North America shared the first live TV program to be spread across half of the world. Then a month later in August Telstar was use to synchronize the official clocks in Europe and America to within 1 milli-second.

The Launch of Telstar 1 (Credit: NASA)

Now you might have noticed that I haven’t even mentioned anything so far about The Soviet Union’s efforts to develop communications satellites. Well that’s because the use of satellites to relay radio signals around the world was the one section of the early space race where America led the way right from the very start. You see, despite the advantage that the USSR had with their larger rockets, which were capable of putting larger spacecraft into orbit, it was the American advantage in electronics that mattered in the design and development of Comsats.

In addition the Soviets were not so concerned with the commercial benefits of communications satellites. So it was that their first series of Comsats, christened Molniya or lightning in Russian, were designed for military communications only. The first successful Molniya satellite was not launched until April 23rd of 1965, nearly three years after Telstar. This backwardness in technology continues to this very day with Russian presently buying its Comsats from western, primarily American aerospace companies.

The Soviet Molniya Communications Satellite (Credit: Astroautix)

Although Telstar I and its sister Telstar II demonstrated all of the possible benefits that Comsats could bring the fact that it had not been placed in Clarke’s geostationary orbit meant that it could only be used for 20 minutes out of every 2-hour orbit. It was only later, as more powerful communications satellites were installed 35,700 km above the equator that the communications revolution we are now living in became possible. Nevertheless it was Telstar that led the way.

 

NASA Scientists set up Experiment into the Origins of Life.

We humans have been obsessed with the question of the origin of life on Earth at least as long as recorded history, probably much longer. In ancient times the gods, of one variety or another always got the credit. And let’s be honest, the difference between living and non-living things is so enormous, so mysterious that it really seems as if some sort of supernatural ‘spirit’ must be involved.

Modern science however seeks more natural causes and in the last few hundred years considerable progress has been made. In the 1950s there was the famous Miller-Urey experiment that recreated Earth’s early atmosphere of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane and ammonia and used an electric spark to generate amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. (If you’re not familiar with the Miller-Urey experiment check out my post of 11Nov17 or look for ‘Miller-Urey experiment’ on Youtube). The basic result of the Miller-Urey experiment was that in the chemical rich soup of Earth’s early atmosphere all that was needed was a source of energy, lightning for example, to begin the process of generating life.

Setup of the Miller-Urey Experiment (Credit: Krishna.org)

Many experts now feel that one of the possible sources of that energy may have been the hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the planet’s ancient oceans. Now if you’re not familiar with hydrothermal vents they are hot springs of superheated water located near underwater volcanoes, like the hot springs around land volcanoes. The superheated water pouring out of those vents is chemical rich and various types of bacteria thrive in conditions that would boil most living things. Larger animals then feed off of the bacteria and an entire, unique ecology exists just around these vents.

A Hydrothermal Vent (Credit: Phys.org)
Some of the Living Things around a Hydrothermal Vent (Credit: EMTV Online)

To study the role that these hydrothermal vents may have played in the early Earth NASA scientists working at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory have recreated the environment around a hydrothermal vent as it would have been some 4 billion years ago. The team, led by astrobiologist Laurie Barge, mixed a chemical solution of ammonia and pyruvate in water, both chemicals are commonly found near hydrothermal vents, in a glass container. By heating the solution to 70º C and decreasing the oxygen content the container became a modern day reproduction of the primordial ocean.

Researchers Laurie Barge (L) and Erika Flores (R) in their Lab (Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)
Time Lapse recreation of a Hydrothermal vent in a Lab (Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

It wasn’t long before amino acids began to form just as in the Miller-Urey experiment, clearly demonstrating that there were multiple locations on the early Earth where life could have begun. Biologists and chemists studying the origin of life still have a few more steps in the process that need to be discovered. However the results of the work at JPL do highlight how broad a set of conditions can trigger the initial steps in that process.

And not just here on Earth! You may have noticed how I mentioned that the team leader Laurie Barge is an astrobiologist, someone interested in life in outer space, and life on other worlds is a big part of the JPL experiment.

You see planetary scientists are quite certain that two of the moons in our Solar System have oceans of liquid water with hydrothermal vents very similar to those here on Earth. Both Jupiter’s moon Europa and Saturn’s moon Enceladus are covered with a sheet of ice but there is evidence that beneath the ice there are oceans of liquid water, and keeping that water in a liquid state is the heat from hydrothermal vents, just like those here on Earth.

Are there Hydrothermal vents beneath Europa’s icy surface? (Credit: NASA)
Enceladus is another possible location for Hydrothermal vents (Credit: NASA)

So Dr. Barge and her colleagues weren’t just studying the origins of life here on Earth but the possibility of life on Europa and Enceladus as well. Right now NASA is preparing robotic missions to both of these moons and it is hoped that the results of the JPL experiment may give those mission planners a better idea of how to go about looking for life on those alien worlds!

Space News for March 2019.

There’s been quite a bit of news about space the past month so let’s get to it!

The big news of course in the successful launch of Space X’s manned version of their Dragon space capsule and its arrival at the International Space Station (ISS). Although in this final test the Dragon capsule is unmanned nevertheless this launch represents the first time that a human capable spacecraft has taken off from American soil since the last Shuttle flight back in 2011. Since that time all American astronauts have had to pay for a ride on the Russian Soyuz spacecraft in order to get to the ISS.

Launch of Space X’s Crew Dragon Capsule (Credit: Press TV)

The test schedule now calls for the Dragon capsule to remain docked with the ISS for several days before returning to Earth. When, and if the capsule reenters the atmosphere and splashes down in the Atlantic Ocean safely NASA and Space X will review the data from the mission before scheduling an actual manned mission later this year. Hopefully by early next year there will be regularly scheduled flights leaving Cape Canaveral for the ISS. Oh, I forgot to mention that once again Space X succeeded in recovering the rocket’s first stage so that it can be used again

The Dragon Capsule Docked at the ISS (Credit: NASA)
Astronauts about the ISS enter the Dragon Capsule (Credit: NASA)

And Space X isn’t alone in this effort; Boeing Corporation also has a human capable space capsule called the Starliner that is scheduled to conduct its unmanned test sometime in April. Both of these companies’ efforts are a part of NASA’s commercial crew program whose intention is to ‘hand off’ the transportation of cargo and personnel up to Low Earth Orbit (LOE) so that NASA can concentrate its efforts on human exploration beyond Earth orbit.

Boeing’s Starliner Capsule being readied from it’s test launch (Credit: Boeing)

With NASA helping to fund the development of both the Dragon and Starliner capsules the two commercial companies hope to find other customers as well. The possibilities of taking patrons to space hotels along with small countries who would like the recognition of putting an astronaut into orbit without the cost of building an entire launch system could be quite profitable. In the long term the commercialization of LOE could jumpstart space travel by lowering cost while increasing access.

 

Of course there’s some other space news as well. Staying with NASA for the moment the space agency has announced its plan for a return to a manned lunar landing by the year 2028. The first part of this plan will be to use the Space Launch System (SLS), now nearing completion, to construct a space station called Gateway in Lunar orbit. One piece of news is the announcement by the nation of Canada that it intends to participate in the construction of Gateway, to the tune of $150 million Canadian dollars per year.

Illustration of the Space Launch System (Credit: NASA)
The Gateway Lunar Orbiting Platform (Credit: Wikipedia)

During the time that Gateway is being built in Lunar orbit a reusable lander module will be developed. That way the Gateway station can serve as a ‘parking garage’ for the lander module with the SLS taking astronauts back and forth to Gateway.

For the moment NASA is asking for bids for a robotic Lunar Lander. Nine companies have been asked to submit bids under the new Commercial Lunar Payload Services or CLPS program. These unmanned landers will be designed to carry a number of different payloads, perhaps one day including supplies to a manned Moon base.

Draper Corp. proposed Lunar Lander for NASA’s CLPS program (Credit: Space News)

 

Finally, further out in space the Japanese probe Hayabusa 2 has successfully touched down on the asteroid Ryugu, you can’t call it a landing the asteroid’s gravity is too low. The asteroid is currently about 270 million kilometers from the Earth. The image below shows the shadow of Hayabusa 2 on the surface on Ryugu as it made it’s final approach.

Shadow of the Hayabusa 2 Probe against the surface of Ryugu (Credit: Universe Today)

Before making contact the probe shot a pinball-sized object at the asteroid in order to kick up a little dust for the space probe to study. Now the probe is on the surface and is preparing to take its first samples of the asteroid’s surface materials.

Artist’s Impression of Hayabusa 2 hovering above Ryugu (Credit: Astronomy.Com)

Two more landings, and sample collections are planned for Hayabusa before it begins its return trip in December of this year (2019). The material collected by Hayabusa is scheduled to arrive back at Earth just a year later in December 2020.

 

Can Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) be used to fight infectious Diseases?

All of the infectious diseases that afflict us have one problem in common that they must solve, how to pass from an infected individual to an uninfected one. Some take the shortest path and move from person to person by touch. Our skin is actually pretty tough however so without a cut or other wound allowing the germs to get inside infection rarely takes place. Some microbes get themselves sprayed into the air by a cough or sneeze in order to be breathed in by their victim, but that’s very much hit or miss with most of the germs left hanging out in space.

A Sneeze can release millions of disease germs ready to infect a healthy person. (Credit: India Today)

Then there are some that actually use another living creature to literally take them from a sick person to new victims. A couple of well known examples of this type of disease are malaria, which uses the mosquito Anopheles gambiae to transmit the bacteria and bubonic plague which uses fleas that are themselves transported by rats. These organisms that pass on diseases from one person to another are referred to a ‘vector’ by epidemiologists and controlling the spread of the vectors, the rats and mosquitoes has often proved to be the most effective way to fight the diseases they spread.

The Anopheles Mosquito carries Malaria one one person to another. (Credit: ZME Science)

Now some biologists are actually trying to use the technology of gene editing to modify the DNA of the vector organisms in an effort to make those species unable to spread the diseases! See my posts of 5Aug17, 1Sept18, 1Dec18 and 12Jan19 for information on gene editing. Two such projects are now reaching the stage where field-testing could soon begin!

 

I mentioned the disease malaria above, a disease that most epidemiologists believe is responsible for the death of half of all the human beings who have ever lived. Think of that, half of all the people who have ever died were killed by the single disease malaria. Even today malaria is a terrible scourge in many parts of the world killing an estimated million people yearly while 300-400 million suffer from the disease.

It’s easy to understand therefore that many efforts are underway to fight this deadly disease. One of these efforts involves the use of gene editing techniques to control the population of the Anopheles gambiae mosquito that transports the malaria germ.

Using the gene-editing tool CRISPR a high security lab in Terni Italy has produced a modified form of female mosquito whose mouth parts resemble those of the males. You see it’s only the female mosquitoes who actually bite, sucking the blood of warm blooded animals in which they incubate their eggs. Females with male mouth parts would be unable to bite, unable to breed in the wild.

GMO Mosquito feeding off of Cow’s Blood (Credit: Pierre Kattar, NPR)

The idea is to artificially breed large numbers of male mosquitoes with the modified gene and release them into the wild. There they will breed and all of their female offspring will be sterile while the male offspring will continue to propagate the edited gene. It is hoped that this will cause the local population to crash, reducing the occurrence of malaria.

The problem, as it always is with gene editing, is unintended consequences. Both genetics and ecology are extremely complex matters that we still know very little about and releasing GMO mosquitoes into the wild will almost certainly alter the environment in unexpected ways. If nothing less, the crash of the Anopheles gambiae population in an area could lead to another species of mosquito, possibly carrying a different disease such as yellow fever to move in to the empty ecological niche.

GMO Mosquitoes are kept tightly controlled at High Security Lab in Terni (Credit: Pierre Kattar, NPR)

The scientists at Terni, led by lab director Ruth Mueller, are aware of the possible dangers, that’s why they’re doing the experiments in a high security lab in order to make certain none of the GMO mosquitoes escape prematurely. To further reduce the danger the mosquitoes will be subjected to long term studies prior to any actual release.

That means that there’s a long way to go and a lot of work still to go on this project but any advance that helps in the fight against malaria would represent a tremendous victory.

 

The second project I’ll discuss involves combating Lyme disease by modifying the DNA of mice. You see the spread of Lyme disease involves a complex back and forth between mice, fleas and deer; it’s really a disease of deer more than it is of humans. Both the mice and fleas are born uninfected but once a mouse is bitten by an infected flea it becomes a carrier and any fleas that subsequently bite the mouse also becomes carriers, and can then pass the disease to a deer, or a human.

Deer Tick infecting someone with Lyme Disease (Credit: AFMC)

Some mice however appear to be immune to Lyme disease and according to MIT evolutionary biologist Kevin Esvelt that presents an opportunity. Dr. Esvelt has been experimenting with the mice, identifying the genes that provide the immunity. Dr. Esvelt now plans to use the gene-editing tool CRISPR to insert the immunity genes into the reproductive cells of the mice so that all of their offspring are born immune to Lyme disease.

Can altering the genes of Mice help to fight Lyme Disease? (Credit: NPR)

For field testing Dr. Esvelt has proposed releasing thousands of GMO mice onto some of the uninhabited islands off of Nantucket Island in the State of Massachusetts. It happens that Lyme disease is an epidemic on Nantucket; over 40% of the human population there has been infected, so the people of the island are more than ready to at least listen to Dr. Esvelt’s plan.

Now Dr. Esvelt is well aware of the possibility of unintended consequences, genetics and ecology are both very complex subjects after all. That’s what makes trying the plan on a small, uninhabited island first so attractive; the GMO mice will be confined until all of the ramifications have been studied. Only then, when not only Dr. Esvelt but all of the people of Nantucket are satisfied will the experiment move on to phase 2, releasing the mice onto Nantucket itself.

Plan for using GMO Mice to battle Lyme Disease on Nantucket (Credit: nMagazine.com)

In other words this is also a project that will take years before it can be called a success. Still, if the genetically modified mice do help to eradicate Lyme disease from the islands of Massachusetts then we will have another potent weapon in our fight against infections like Lyme disease.