There’s a brand new Actress who is now the talk of Hollywood. It’s not because of her beauty or acting ability. It’s because she doesn’t really exist, she’s just a creation of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Pretty young actresses are a dime a dozen in Hollywood, have been for more than a century now. Anyone who dreams of making a career in acting goes to tinsel town in the hopes of being discovered and becoming a big movie star. In many ways Tilly Norwood is just another face in the crowd, she’s had a few screen tests and she’s started a video blog (vblog) where she talks about her life and the career she hopes to have. Just like a lot of other young actresses.

Actress Tilly Norwood enjoying her morning stroll while stopping for a coffee. Sounds just like a lot of people’s lives except that Tilly is just the invention of a computer program that has been taught, you don’t program an AI you teach it, to generate realistic images of a young woman who hopes to become an actress. (Credit: Wikipedia)

 Tilly Norwood is not like other actresses however because she actually doesn’t exist except as several billion bytes of data stored on computer hard drives. You see Tilly Norwood is a creation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a computer program that has been trained to reproduce how real actresses look and behave. Tilly is the invention of a Dutch actress with a Master’s Degree in Physics (There’s a combination for ya!) named Eline Van der Velden whose company Particle6 developed and currently holds all the rights to Tilly.

Actress and Physicist Eline Van der Velden is the creative force behind Tilly Norwood. Her company, Particle6, is hoping to get Tilly some real roles in movies and videos. They also plan to develop other AI generated performers as well. (Credit: Physics World)

So far Tilly has only appeared as an actress in brief sketches, both comedy and drama, and only by herself. Nevertheless her creator (her Dr. Frankenstein?) hopes that Tilly will become the next Scarlett Johansson and her company hopes to develop other ‘hyperreal digital stars’ for TV, movies as well as social media. At the same time Van der Velden insists that Tilly ‘is not a replacement for a human being but a creative work – a piece of art”, something of a contradiction on her part.

One way to distinguish between and AI generated image and an image of a real person is in the eyes. In the eyes of a real person the reflections of any lights have to be the same, that’s just physics. If the reflections are different, as in this case, then the image is computer generated. Of course, knowing this the people who use AI to generate such images are teaching their programs to make the reflections the same. All this turns into an arms race between the scientists trying to find techniques to separate real from fiction and the people trying to make their images seem as real as possible. Also just remember the old adage, if something looks too good to be real, it probably isn’t! (Credit: Instagram)

Very few real actors would agree with Van der Velden. In fact dozens of actors and actresses have criticized the whole project. The fact that Particle6 has recently announced that they are activity seeking an agent for Tilly has only made matters worse with the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) calling for a boycott of any agent who takes on an AI creation as a client.

Of course, real actors are no happier about computers taking their jobs than factory workers or cab drivers. The recent strike by Sag-Aftra was partly about the use of AI in Hollywood. (Credit: Rolling Stone)

In response Particle6 points out how in the past animation and CGI opened up new possibilities in entertainment and so they say will AI. The difference is of course that with animation and CGI it is still possible to distinguish the product from reality. As the AI creations continue to get better and better however it’s becoming more and more difficult to be certain just what is reality.

Did animation take jobs away from real actors? The people using AI to generate realistic actors feel that they are simply improving the technology of an art form that has been around for decades. (Credit: D23)

You can understand how real actors feel about the possibility of AI avatars taking their jobs. We are all aware of how automation has replaced millions of blue-collar factor workers and how driverless cars are currently threatening the future of truck drivers, cab drivers and bus drivers. With the latest computer programs that can learn, that’s what an AI is, a program that can be taught how to do a job rather than having to have each step in a process carefully written out for it, a huge number of white-collar jobs are now in jeopardy. One of the big issues that caused the recent strikes by SAG-AFTRA and the Screenwriters Guild was the use of AI by Hollywood Producers.

Over the last 60 years automation has eliminated millions of blue-collar jobs. Is this now going to happen to white-collar jobs as well? (Credit: Asia Sentinel)

The fear of AI in Hollywood includes not only actors but also screenwriters, set designers, cameramen and even directors. Think about it, producers would no longer have to put up with temperamental actors, or actors who are getting a little too old for the part, or who have gained, or lost weight. TV audiences in particular like to see a familiar face each week so why not give them an AI whose face never changes no matter how long their show has been on. Right now there’s the difficulty of how to get an AI actor to be on the screen at the same time as a real actor but that’s a technical problem and will be solved in a few years.

The Geico Gecko, who is just CGI, already interacts with people in a limited fashion. In the same way AI actors will probably get their first ‘roles’ in commercials rather than TV shows or movies. (Credit: The New York Times)

There’s one more thing that gets actors very upset about AI actors. I mentioned above that the Particle6 AI learned how actors and actresses look and behave. Well how did it do that? By looking at hours and hours of real actors and actresses that’s how.  Many in the entertainment field feel that AIs like Tilly are using their performances, stealing their rights and there are certainly going to be lawsuits dealing with the question of just how much of Scarlett Johnasson, or other actresses is there in Tilly and other AIs like her.

This is a screen shot from a YouTube site, I’m not including the name of the site. The site is just dozens of short AI videos of ‘girls’ none of whom actually exist. Now these ‘girls’ are not as sophisticated as Tilly Norwood, all they do in the videos is shake their booty, but they all have biographies and wikis! This is getting a little crazy don’t you think! (Credit: R. A. Lawler)

I’m betting that AI will worm its way into Hollywood through advertisements. Think about it, we already have plenty of ads with non-real characters in them like the Geico Gecko or the Liberty Mutual Emu. Producers of local commercials may not be restricted by the same contract rules as Hollywood producers and will undoubtedly be tempted to go fully AI once the technology has proven itself.

Another way of distinguishing an AI generated image is to look carefully at the background. The people who create these images don’t pay as much attention to the background so you can often spot weird things there. What does ‘Refima’ , see inset, mean? (Credit: R. A. Lawler)

Then there’s also the question of how society will react to AI creations on our movie, TV and mobile screens. Will the perfect AI faces we can see at any time cause us to retreat further from real interactions with real humans? Hollywood has already given us celebrities whose attractiveness and exciting lives make us pay less attention to the people around us. What will happen when we have AI generated characters who are designed to be perfect!

Is this our future? I hope not! (Credit: Facebook)

It all just goes to show how computers are taking over the jobs that millions of human beings have relied on for generations. We have to start figuring out what kind of world are we going to have when AI has been fully integrated into society. Whether that integration will be for the good of humanity or not, is still very much in question.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *