Movie Review: ‘Belfast’

The new movie ‘Belfast’ from writer / director Kenneth Branagh is a semi-biographical account of his own experiences as a young boy living through ‘The Troubles’ that broke out in Northern Ireland during the late 1960s. And while ‘Belfast’ may not be science fiction it is an important film showing how the smallest of differences between people can be exploited to generate a hate that can last for decades.

‘Belfast’ a new Film from Writer / Director Kenneth Branagh, official Poster. (Credit: IMDB)

Now a bit of self disclosure to start. By descent I am much like Ireland herself, three quarters Irish Catholic and one quarter Scots-Irish Presbyterian so I’ve known about ‘The Troubles’ my entire life and in some sense they are actually inside of me. (I’ve always loved the old George Carlin line, “I used to be Irish-Catholic, now I’m an American, ya grow!”)

The Wisdom of the Irish is always mixed with a little bitter humour. (Credit: AZ Quotes)

And another thing I’ve recognized my entire life is that, if you showed pictures of Irish Catholics and Scots-Irish Protestants to 95% of the people in this world not only wouldn’t they be able to tell the difference between them most probably wouldn’t even know what you’re talking about. Think about it, would someone from China be able to tell? Would someone from Bolivia? Pakistan? Chad?

Throughout “The Troubles’ men like the Protestant Ian Paisley and the Catholic Gerry Adams took advantage of the hated for their own ends. Can you tell which one is which? (Credit: Wikipedia)

The truth is that the people of Northern Ireland are really all the same, one people living together and it takes a lot of hatred and anger to find enough differences to start a quarrel. And maybe that’s true of the whole world, don’t you think?

Actor, Director and now writer Kenneth Branagh escaped ‘The Troubles’ by moving to England. Many others didn’t have that option. (Credit: Disney wiki)

That’s enough sermonizing, back to the movie ‘Belfast’. The story centers around a young boy named Buddy, played by newcomer Jude Hill. Buddy is a Protestant who lives with his family on a street that also has several catholic families so their street becomes one of the centers of violence as ‘The Troubles’ erupt. Buddy’s family includes his mother, played by actress Ciatriona Balfe, his father, actor Jamie Dornan and older brother Will, played by Lewis McAskie.

Newcomer Jude Hill plays young Buddy with wide-eyed innocence. (Credit: MARCA)

Family is a strong theme running throughout ‘Belfast’ nearly every other actor is listed in the credits as ‘Auntie Violet’ or ‘Cousin Vanessa’ or ‘Uncle Sammy’. And family plays a role in the plot because while Buddy’s father wants to protect his family by leaving the country his mother can’t bear the idea of moving to Canada or Australia because, “we won’t have any family there!”

Buddy and his family at the movies. If they added an older sister it could very much be my family! (Credit: Roger Ebert)

As we view the events of ‘Belfast’ through the eyes of a young boy we also see those things that are important to a child, his friends, his toys, TV shows. And from this viewpoint we don’t really learn much about ‘The Troubles’, the causes or the leaders, we simply experience them as sudden, chaotic and frightening. I don’t know if it was director Branagh’s intention to portray the causes of violence as unimportant but that is a message I got, and maybe children who don’t understand the causes of the violence around them are actually wiser than we are.

The causes of violence are many, or maybe we’re just not as evolved as we think we are. (Credit: YWCA Evanston)

And that’s what makes ‘Belfast’ an important movie for today. In a world where those whom we’ve elected to govern us are behaving more and more like bratty children, where any perceived insult is a reason to start shooting, where every issue is viewed through a lens of ‘us’ versus ‘them’ seeing such childish attitudes from a child’s viewpoint may actually remind us that we’re supposed to be adults. Well maybe!

We always grieve for the children whose lives are impacted by war and violence. Of course that’s never stopped us from having wars of other kinds of violence. (Credit: Motherhood)

I do have a few criticisms of ‘Belfast’, one in particular. The movie is mostly filmed in black and white because we all know that the 1960s were in black and white, really some directors just think that black and white gives a film an ‘olde time’ feel. Some parts are in colour however, for example when the family goes to see the movie ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” the movie is in colour. Or when Buddy takes his Grandma, played by Judy Dench, to see a live performance of Dickens ‘Christmas Carol’ the actors on stage are in colour while the audience is black and white. Personally I found the cinematic trickery distracting, and while Northern Ireland in the 60’s may not have been very colourful it wasn’t actually in Black and White. The message of ‘Belfast’ would have been better served if the whole movie had just been in colour, like the reality it sought to reflect.

The city of Belfast has known peace since the ‘Good Friday’ agreement brought power sharing in the north and the formation of the European Union removed the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Now Brexit threatens that peace. (Credit: Queen’s University Belfast)

Still ‘Belfast’ is both an important and a very moving film. By reflecting a chaotic and violent event from the past it portrays very well the madness that’s growing in our world today.

Movie Review: Godzilla versus Kong.

When I was a kid I have to admit I dragged my dad to some pretty rotten movies. Anything with a dinosaur or something that resembled a dinosaur I had to see. It’s a measure of how bad some of those movies were that 1962’s ‘King Kong versus Godzilla’ was by no means the worse. In fact I think my dad was kinda looking forward to that one because he mentioned several times how much he had enjoyed seeing the original ‘King Kong’ when he was a kid.

Yes it was as bad as it looked. But at age eight, 1962’s King Kong versus Godzilla was a must see for me. (Credit: Rotten Tomatoes)
The original King Kong from 1933 remains a classic however! (Credit: Britannica)

At one time or another I’ve seen every Godzilla movie, even the really bad 70s ones like Godzilla versus Megalon, and every Kong movie including Dino de Laurentiis’s 1976 redo of ‘King Kong’. It’s worth pointing out that de Laurentiis’s Kong cost more than then times as much as ‘Godzilla versus Megalon’ but stank just as bad.

In 1976 Dino de Laurentiis promised that there would be no guy in a monkey suit for his version of King Kong but what we got was a guy in a monkey suit!!!!! (Credit: Deadly Movies)

So as you might guess the new Warner Brothers release ‘Godzilla versus Kong’ was a must see for me, Covid-19 or no Covid-19. O’k I’ll be honest, we signed up for HBO-Max in order to see it in our home. Still, I did get to see it!

The two titans meet once again. Official poster for Godzilla versus Kong. (Credit: YouTube)

Now let’s get one thing straight from the start, nobody goes to see a monster movie because they like good acting or a well thought out plot. You go to see huge creatures demolishing entire cities and wiping out whole armies. That used to mean guys in rubber monster suits stepping on toy tanks and swatting toy planes out of the air while smashing miniature buildings but today it’s all done with CGI. That makes no difference however; a monster movie is all about monsters being monstrous.

I gotta admit, fighting on the deck of an aircraft carrier was a neat idea! (Credit: The Conversation)

In that respect ‘Godzilla versus Kong’ delivers. In addition to two big fights between the title characters there are several flights with lesser monsters all leading up to a big finale where the two good monsters, of course both Kong and Godzilla are really good guys, take on the real bad guy. I’ll leave it at that, no spoilers here.

As in most monster movies the plot that the human actors are following is all just to set up for the big fights and again ‘Godzilla versus Kong is no exception. The two plots, it’s actually difficult to determine which is the main plot and which is subplot, are both silly and contrived but they do successfully integrate at the climax to bring the main monsters together for the big fight. The actors are not expected to display any real depth of emotion in their acting and for the most part live up to that expectation. 

It’s a measure of how unimportant the humans are in Godzilla versus Kong that this was the only picture I could find with any of ‘the stars’ in it! (Credit: YouTube)

The effects, and really a monster movie is all about the effects, are quite good but honestly I think we’ve reached a point where CGI just isn’t going to get dramatically better. The CGI in “Godzilla versus Kong’ is no better or worse than in ‘Avengers: Endgame.’ Like any superhero or sci-fi movie the end credits of ‘Godzilla versus Kong’ list an army of computer artists who produced most of what you see in the movie but I really don’t think that adding any more artists, or any more computing power, is going to significantly improve the product. It looks to me like CGI has hit the law of diminishing returns.

CGI turning actor Andy Serkis into a Chimpanzee. It’s hard to imagine CGI getting much better than this. (Credit: The Indian Express)

You may have heard that Warner Brothers is hoping to turn their monsters, known in Japan as Kaiju, into a cinematic universe to compete with Marvel’s superhero MCU. This universe began with 2014’s “Godzilla’ before going on to 2017’s “Kong of Skull Island’ and 2019’s ‘Godzilla, King of the Monsters’ but I don’t know how much further this monsterverse, or would that be Godizillaverse, can go. After three Godzilla and two Kong movies they need some other monster to step up for a change of pace but let’s be honest there’s no other monster who can carry a movie by themselves. Don’t get me started on Rodan. If either Godzilla or Kong has to appear in every movie I have to ask how many more they can do?

Rodan from his 1965 film debut. Really, he’ll never be more than a monster sidekick! (Credit: Villains Wiki)

At the risk of being presumptuous I do have a suggestion. If Warner Brothers could obtain the movie rights to the works of H. P. Lovecraft then they could do a film version of ‘The Call of Cthulhu’. The follow up to that would then be ‘Godzilla versus Cthulhu’, integrating Lovecraft’s ‘Ye Olde Ones’ into the Japanese Kaiju creatures. Sounds good to me!

Godzilla versus Cthulhu, you heard it here first folks. And it will probably be the last time you’ll ever hear it! (Credit: The Daily Grail)

Still I’ve no doubt that it won’t be long before there’s another Godzilla movie. After all the big green guy first premiered back in 1954 as the Japanese film ‘Gojira’ and ‘Godzilla versus Kong’ is his 36th feature film. And when there another Godzilla movie you can be certain I’ll be there to see it.

Movie Review: ‘The Dig’, on Netflix.

Although it was released to a small number of movie theaters in the UK your best chance of seeing ‘The Dig’, the story of the discovery of the Sutton Hoo ship burial in the UK in 1939, is via the streaming service Netflix. In these days of the Covid-19 pandemic many film production companies are either holding on to their products until things return to normal, such as the next James Bond movie, or skipping the theaters to go directly to TV like Godzilla versus Kong. With the latter generally appearing on a subscription movie service like Netflix.

Poster for ‘The Dig’ on Netflix. (Credit: Netflix)

What long-term effect the pandemic is going to have on the movie industry can only be guessed at present. Movie theater corporations have been badly hurt by the loss of revenue due to the pandemic with Regal theaters declaring bankruptcy while AMC is barely holding on. If theaters in general disappear what will happen to the big, and costly blockbuster movies that Hollywood has come to depend on? It’s a good question as to whether a big budget Avengers movie could even make a profit if it’s only going to be seen in people’s homes? Only time will tell us what the answer will be. But for now we do still have movies to watch and review and this review is about ‘The Dig’.

The story of ‘The Dig’ begins as it did in real life, with landowner Edith Pretty, played by actress Carey Mulligan, on whose large property in Suffolk England are a number of earthen mounds that she suspects are archaeological sites. Local landmarks, the mounds even have a name that dates back centuries, Sutton Hoo, a name that in old English roughly translates as southern farmstead hill.

The site of Sutton Hoo as it is today, restored to about as it was in 1939. The ship burial mound is center top. (Credit: history.furman.edu)

Like many members of the English gentry at that time Edith had read about Howard Carter’s excavation of the tomb of the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun. Wondering what may be hidden in her mounds Misses Pretty, Edith was a widow as the story begins, contacts with a local amateur archaeologist named Basil Brown, played by Ralph Fiennes, to excavate the largest of the mounds, one that she has a feeling about.

The real Edith Pretty (l) and as portrayed by actress Kate Mulligan (r). (Credit: The Telegraph)
The real Basil Brown (l) and as portrayed by actor Ralph Fiennes. (Credit: Heritage.suffolk.gov.uk and Yorkshire Evening Post)

What Basil discovers is the remains of a long wooden ship similar to a Viking dragon ship. He realizes that the mound is a ship burial, an entire ancient ship used as a platform, a coffin in a sense, for the burial of a Viking king or powerful noble. Such burials are known both from historical records as well as archaeological sites in Scandinavia. 

Artists impression of a ship burial. Obviously the departed was a person of great consequence and yes we do know of at least one woman who was so interred. (Credit: Pinterest)
Photograph of the excavation at Sutton Hoo. The remaining wood was so decayed that it could not be removed and really it was more of an impression in the soil than anything else. (Credit: Current Archaeology)

When the ship is about a third excavated and the nature of the find becomes news across the country a professional archaeologist named Charles Phillips from the British Museum arrives to take over. That’s one of the themes of ‘The Dig’, British snobbery. Throughout the first half of the movie anytime Brown wishes to talk to Misses Pretty he has to wait outside while the butler goes to get her, he’s hired help after all. And of course anyone with a university degree should be the one giving the orders rather than someone whom is really only a farmer playing at archaeologist.

By this time however Edith has come to trust Basil and since the mounds are on her land a truce is arranged where professional and amateur work together to complete the dig. As artifacts are discovered it soon becomes obvious that the burial is too old to be Viking. It’s Anglo-Saxon, straight out of the deepest part of the Dark Ages. Artifact after artifact is unearthed from the mound as Basil and the team from London occasionally glance nervously skyward where warplanes are roaring overhead.

A gold shoulder clasp from Sutton Hoo. This is just one part of the treasure discovered. (Credit: Wikipedia)

That’s the second theme of ‘The Dig’ because the excavation of Sutton Hoo took place in the late summer of 1939 as Europe was preparing to plunge into the bloodiest war in history. The professionals know that once the war starts, and in the movie no one has any doubt that the war will soon start, they’ll be ordered to stop their work and so the excavation continues with an air of impeding disaster.

Sutton Hoo was the grave of a warlord, as evidenced by his sword. The fact that the burial site was excavated right at the beginning of WW2 is a testament to our violent nature. (Credit: YouTube)

The team does finish in time however and an inquest decides that the treasure belongs to Edith who decides to donate it to the British Museum where she feels that the greatest number of people will be able see it. Indeed, today the Sutton Hoo treasure has an entire room at the British Museum. And to anyone who may not be familiar with Sutton Hoo treasures I heartily recommend checking out the museum’s site. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/galleries/sutton-hoo-and-europe

The Sutton Hoo helmet (l) and a modern reconstruction (r) shown at the British Museum. (Credit: Wikipedia)

I’m certain that by now you can tell that I’m giving ‘The Dig’ a big thumb’s up. The acting is impeccable and the cinematography is simply gorgeous. Most of all the story, the story of how the English people regained a large part of their history is both interesting as well as important.

A few last remarks. Although the body had long ago decayed away, it is thought that the person buried in the mound was probably King Rӕdwald of East Anglia or perhaps his son. Regardless of who it was, by being buried in such spectacular fashion he left us a great deal of evidence of the world in which he lived.

A map of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms as they would have been at the time of the Sutton Hoo ship burial. (Credit: Totally Timelines)

And the treasures of Sutton Hoo spent the war safely buried at an underground station in London. It wasn’t until nine years later that the British Museum first exhibited the treasure, with no mention being made of the role of Basil Brown in the discovery. After all, an amateur could not possibly have made England’s greatest archaeological discovery. But archaeology has a way of correcting for the prejudges of the past and today Basil Brown’s name is prominently displayed right next to that of Edith Pretty in the exhibit of the treasures of ‘The Dig’.