Paleontology News for May 2022: Three Stories that highlight how evolution is really all about ‘Eat or be Eaten’.  

If you think about it the very first living creatures lived by just absorbing the nutrients in the water around them, not interacting at all with the other simple creatures nearby. After a few million years however some of those early life forms must have evolved to feed off of the dead remains of other creatures. And not too long thereafter, in geologic time at least, some creatures evolved to prey on their living fellows, and so the war of all against all (Bellum omnium contra omnes) began.

Who do you think is right? Of course reality lies somewhere in the middle. Still conflict does touch the life of every creature at some point in their existence. (Credit: sfk.sa)

And many if not most of the anatomical design and features of those living things we call animals are intended to optimize their consumption of other organisms, plants in the case of herbivores and other animals in the case of predators. Today’s stories are all about some of the ways that evolution solved the problem of ‘Eat or be Eaten.’ As usual I will begin in the distant past and work my way forward in time.

Many of the anatomical features of living things are intended to either prey on other creatures or to escape being preyed upon. (Credit: The Phrase Finder)

Without doubt the ultimate form of ‘Eat or be Eaten’ would have to be cannibalism, where an animal literally preys upon and eats another member of its own species. In modern human civilization cannibalism is considered to be one of the most evil and horrible acts that a person can commit. It is worth considering however that cannibalism has been observed in more than 1,500 species, including we humans and whether we like it or not there are some pretty good evolutionary reasons for it.

For human beings cannibalism is either used as a last resort to avoid starvation or as a religious ritual to absorb some of the spirit of the dead person, usually either a relative or an enemy. (Credit: The Guardian)

You see by preying upon another member of your species you not only gain a meal but you are also eliminating a competitor for precious resources. For that reason cannibalism is often found in circumstances where food or other resources are scarce. Cannibalism does have its downside however because if you’re not careful you could be eliminating a relative or potential mate or even your own children and thereby reducing your share in the gene pool. And of course any species that practices cannibalism too much runs the risk of literally eating itself into extinction.

We modern, civilized people all think that cannibalism is simply the the most depraved kind of behaviour. So why do we find the character of Hannibal the cannibal so fascinating? (Credit: Solon.com)

But just how long has cannibalism been a behavioral strategy used by living creatures? Think about it, solid evidence for cannibalism isn’t exactly easy to find in the fossil record. Now a paper published in the journal Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology has announced that indications of cannibalism can be found at a 514 million year old Cambrian period fossil site on an island off the South Australian coast at a place called Emu Bay.

The fossil site is on Kangaroo Island in Emu Bay. Looks like a real fun place to me! (Credit: ResearchGate)

Emu Bay is one of those rare fossil sites where the preservation of specimens is so pristine that things like injuries and fecal material, called coprolites when fossilized, are easy to identify and analyze. The specimens that were found at Emu bay consisted primarily of two large species of trilobites Redlichia takooensis and Redlichia rex and many of the specimens were that were found had injuries that had healed. Now both trilobite species were large animals for that time, as much as 25 centimeters in length, so anything preying on them had to be at least as big as they were. That’s why the researchers, from the University of New England in Australia, believe that the cause of the injuries could have been another member of the same species.

Look at all those Trilobites!!! Just one of the fossils collected at the Emu Bay site. (Credit: Facebook)
A specimen of Redlichia rex showing evidence of two separate attacks. Since R rex is the largest animal found at Emu bay what could have caused these injuries except another R rex? (Credit: Everything Dinosaur Blog)

Additional proof came from an analysis of the coprolites that were found, most of which were more than 10% the length of the trilobites themselves. Careful examination of the feces showed that they contained bits and pieces of shell material like the shells of the trilobites. More indication that the trilobites would, at least on occasion, chow down on their own kind. Between the injuries and the shell fragments in the coprolites the paleontologists feel they have a compelling case for the existence of cannibalism more than half a billion years ago.

Sorry but when I saw this picture I just had to include it! (Credit: Facebook)

For vertebrate animals like we humans the need to feed efficiently led millions of years ago to the development of that structure that we all associate with eating, the jaw. The first jawed vertebrates appeared in the fossil record more than 400 million years ago as bones that had been used to support the gills of the first fish moved toward the mouth. Before long jaws had evolved into a wide variety of sizes and shapes that depended on both the type of food an animal ate and the method it used to feed.

Jawless fishes, like this Lamprey, still exist even though more efficient jaws evolved hundreds of millions of years ago! (Credit: National Park Service)

(By the way the jawbones of modern vertebrates as they develop after fertilization follows the same developmental path that evolution did 400 million years ago during the Devonian period, this includes you. That is, about 5 weeks after fertilization you had gills, just like every other fish, and the four bones that developed to hold those gills in place then became your jawbone and the bones of your inner ear. The gills then simply disappear once the bones have formed since you no longer need them.)

All vertebrate animals, from fish to we humans, develop gills early on in their lives. (Credit: Quora)

Now a new study has been published in the journal Science Advances that examines the variety of jaws that evolved so quickly back in the Devonian period. What the researchers at the University of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences found was that, despite all of the different sizes and shapes of jaws that evolved 400 million years ago there were two factors that predominated, speed and strength, and these two factors often opposed one another.

Right from the start the evolution of jaws was a compromise between strength and speed. (Credit: TurnedNews.com

Think about it, a predator certainly needs a quick jaw in order to seize its prey before it can get away but if the jaw becomes too quick it can also become weak and brittle and a broken jaw is a virtual death sentence for any animal. So there has to be an evolutionary trade off between speed and strength in order for a predator to be able to successfully grab its dinner without any chance of it injuring itself.

In some ways the evolution of fish has been a story of the evolution of jaws. (Credit: Paleocast / Paleontology Podcasts)

A similar argument can be made for a herbivore, the animal needs a quick jaw to be able be bite off as much food as it can as quickly as it can, because remember plant material usually has a lower energy content. Then the plant eater usually has to grind their food in order to get all possible nourishment out of it, and that requires a good strong jaw.

The jaw of a Hadrosaur dinosaur, like that of a modern Elephant, was built for grinding and mashing of tough vegetable material. (Credit: Flickr)

The researchers used data about jaw size and shape from all of the known early jawed fishes and developed a computer model to compare each for speed and strength. They also included a few theoretical jaw shapes in their analysis. The results of the model clearly showed just how quickly the optimum blend of quickness and strength evolved.

Part comparative anatomy and part computer modeling the paper from the University of Bristol is typical of how modern scientific research is conducted. (Credit: Science Advances)

Now the jaw of a predator is certainly an offensive weapon and in order to protect themselves from predators many herbivores evolve some kind of defensive armour. One of the best known examples of such defensive body evolution is the family of dinosaurs known as the stegosaurs, with Stegosaurus itself having the characteristic two rows of bony plates along its back and long, sharp spikes on it tail that make it a tough meal for any hungry theropod.

The Stegosaurus may be one of the best know of all dinosaurs but it is actually only one of a family of ancient dinos. (Credit: Reductress)

Stegosaurs date from the middle Jurassic period to the early Cretaceous period, 160 million to 100 million years ago but their early evolution is unclear. Now a new specimen from the Chongqing region of China may hold some answers. Dated to about 168 million years ago the animal, which has been named Bashanosaurus primitvus, is the oldest stegosaur from Asia, and perhaps the oldest ever found anywhere.

An artists impression of Bashanosaurus primitvus, the oldest known stegosaur from Asia. (Credit: Sci-News.com)

In fact the animal was given the species name primitvus because of the peculiar, primitive set of characteristics it possesses. Smaller than other known stegosaurs, with thicker more narrow plates along its back B primitvus also had spines sticking out to the side of its shoulders. These features make B primitvus look quite different from other stegosaurs but at the same time it looks quite similar to other types of armoured dinosaurs like the first ankylosaurs that evolved about 20 million years earlier.

Ankylosaurs were another family of armoured dinosaurs. Bashanosaurus appears to have characteristics of both indicating a link between the two families. (Credit: ZME Science)

The paleontologists from the Chinese Bureau of Geological and Mineral Resource Exploration and Development along with the Natural History Museum of London who discovered and described Bashanosaurus hope that the fossil will shed light on the evolution of the stegosaurs. In any case the fact that armoured dinosaurs evolved so quickly, and diversified so rapidly is just the flip side of jaws and claws in the eternal struggle to ‘Eat or be Eaten’.

Space News for April 2022     

It’s on the launch pad, years late and billions of dollars over budget but the Space Launch System (SLS), the most powerful rocket since the venerable Saturn 5 that took astronauts to the moon is finally at Pad 39B at Cape Kennedy, ready for lunch. Well almost ready because the engineers and scientists at both NASA and prime contractor Boeing still have a long list of tests and safety checks to perform before the actual first flight in the space agency’s Artemis program begins. The biggest test, known as the Wet Dress Rehearsal or WDR, is now scheduled for the 1-3 of April.

NASA made a big deal out of the rollout of the SLS to its launch pad, even streaming the entire event. The rocket still has problems however and will soon be taken back to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs. (Credit: Forbes)

The rollout of the massive SLS with its Orion, man capable capsule took place on March 17th as the door of the Vehicle Assembly Building opened and the SLS began its long, slow journey to the launch site. The current schedule is for launch to take place no earlier than sometime in May. That first flight will be unmanned, with the second Artemis mission, and the first mission that will actually take astronauts back to orbiting the Moon, coming no sooner than 2024.

The Orion Capsule on top of the SLS. NASA plans to use Orion to take astronauts back to the Moon and even beyond but without the SLS its going nowhere fast. (Credit: EarthSky)

Update: The SLS was on its launch pad but after failing to complete the WDR three times NASA has decided to return the rocket to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs. Just another in a long series of delays and problems for the Artemis program that is years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget.

The rollback of the SLS itself been delayed by weather, just more delays. The current schedule is for a rollback on 26April. (Credit: Spaceflight Insider)

And even as NASA begins the Artemis program to take human beings back to the Moon the space agency is making plans to also return to a destination much further away, the outer planets of Uranus and Neptune. The only space probe to have visited those cold, dark worlds was Voyager 2, which flew past them in the late 1980s. At the time the data sent back by Voyager taught us more about the two outermost planets in our Solar System than we’d learned in more than a hundred years of observing them by Earth bound telescopes. In the years since Voyager however astronomers have come up with thousands of questions about conditions on Uranus and Neptune that they’d love to see answered.

Currently the Voyage 2 probe is the only spacecraft to visit the planet Uranus. Now NASA has made the decision to return to this icy world in the next decade. (Credit: Drew Ex Machina)

So plans are now being discussed for a joint NASA-ESA mission to the outer planets. Details are sketchy at the moment, even so far as to which planet will be visited, or maybe both. The best upcoming launch window for Uranus is 2030-2034 while that for Neptune is 2029-2030 so the particulars for the mission along with the basic space probe design will probably have to be finalized in the next year or so. One thing that has been decided is that the main probe will carry with it a smaller ‘entry probe’ like the Huygens probe that landed on Titan after being carried to Saturn by the Cassini spacecraft. 

Conceptual design for the proposed Uranus probe. The spacecraft will include a separate probe to be dropped into the atmosphere of Uranus. (Credit: Spaceflight Now)

The journey to Uranus or Neptune will be a long one, anywhere from 11 to 15 years depending on the specifics of both the probe and the mission. Because the journey will take so long, and will take the probe so far away from the Sun, using solar arrays to power the spacecraft will be impossible, sunlight simply isn’t strong enough that far from the Sun. So therefore the Uranus / Neptune probe will have to get it’s power from radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) just as both Voyagers along with Cassini and the Galileo probe to Jupiter did.

Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) have powered many space probes but they have also been used here on Earth to power instruments in very isolated areas. (Credit: Bellona.org)

Sounds like an exciting mission, wouldn’t it be nice if they could find the money to send identical probes to each planet!

The planet Neptune hasn’t had a visitor for a long time either. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could send a probe to both of them! (Credit: NASA)

A sad note before I sign off. Eugene Parker died on March 15th at the age of 94. The highly regarded NASA astrophysicist is best remembered for his 1957 prediction of the solar wind, the stream of charged particles that are constantly being emitted from the Sun’s atmosphere. That prediction was confirmed just five years later when the Mariner 2 space probe was constantly bombarded during its journey to Venus by just the sort of radiation that Parker had predicted.

In many ways the life of Eugene Parker was a mission to touch the Sun. That’s why it’s so appropriate for NASA’s solar probe to be named for him. (Credit: SciTechDaily)

Eugene Parker is also remembered as the namesake of NASA’s Parker Solar Probe which since its launch in 2018 has now approached closer to the Sun than any other man made object. The Parker probe was the first, and thus far only space probe to be named for a living scientist. A fitting tribute to a man who advanced our knowledge of the Sun so much.

One of the Oldest Problems in Mathematics is yielding new results.     

It may be the oldest problem in mathematics; it’s a problem we deal with on a regular basis. How do we divide up a single object, let’s say a pie or cake, so that everyone gets a piece and there’s nothing left to go to waste. Remember some people, like my brother and I like big pieces while some people, like my sister want a smaller piece. In the end all of the various fractions that we cut that cake into have to add up to one, that one cake.

However you do it. When you cut cake the two most important requirements are that everyone gets a piece and nothing goes to waste. Surely that’s one of the oldest problems in mathematics. (Credit: Association for Computing Machinery)

Put in mathematical terms the problem consists of finding a set of integers, let’s say the set (2, 3, and 6) the sum of whose reciprocals 1/2+1/3+1/6=1! We know from archaeological evidence that this problem has been considered since the time of the ancient Egyptians but it had to have been around much longer. After all even Neanderthals had to carve up that deer they killed into pieces that added up to one.

Carving up a rectangle into five different sized pieces, with each piece being the reciprocal of a natural number, an interesting mathematical game. (Credit: Quanta Magazine)
Ancient Egyptian papyrus discussing how to cut up an object into different slices. So it is a problem mathematicians have worked on for a long time. (Credit: Quanta Magazine)

Now of course it’s easy to cut up our cake into n number of pieces each of which is 1/nth of the whole, 8 pieces that are each 1/8th of the pie, pizza chefs get a lot of experience at doing that. Mathematicians however like to make things more complicated so they want to consider solutions where each piece is a different size, and just to make things really interesting they prefer to only use fraction whose numerator is 1 like 1/2 or 1/8 or 1/124, such fractions are technically known as unit fractions because of the number 1 in their numerator. Using unit fractions mathematicians can then search for patterns in the numbers of the denominators, like my example of 2, 3 and 6 above. In this way they can learn about the hidden structure in the numbers that we use everyday.

Unit fractions, with the number one in the numerator and a positive integer in the denominator, may seem simple but they contain a great deal of hidden structure. (Credit: The School Run)

Back in the 1970s this ancient problem got a new twist as the mathematicians Paul Erdős and Ronald Graham published a conjecture that stated that any set of numbers that was sufficiently large, a condition known as positive density, must have a subset of numbers whose reciprocals add up to 1.

As famous in some circles as any rock star or pro athlete, Paul Erdos sure loved his numbers. (Credit: Twitter)

Problem was that few mathematicians, including Erdős and Graham, had any good idea about how to prove their conjecture. So the whole idea kind of just sat there for almost fifty years before a mathematician named Thomas Bloom of Oxford University in England was given an assignment to do a presentation on an effort to prove the Erdős-Graham conjecture by Ernie Croot 20 years ago using the colouring method. In this method numbers are sorted into different baskets by a designated colour. Using a branch of mathematics known as harmonic analysis Croot was able to show that no matter how many baskets were used, at least one would contain a set of numbers fulfilling the Erdős-Graham conjecture. Croot used a type of integral called an exponential sum, which can calculate how many integral solutions there are to a problem. The problem is that exponential sums are almost always impossible to solve exactly so Croot’s methodology was unable to answer the full, positive density version of the conjecture as originally stated by Erdős and Graham.

One of the simpler exponential sum formula, many can only be approximately solved using modern computers. (Credit: Wolfram MathWorld)

But reading Croot’s attempt did get Thomas Bloom thinking about the Erdős-Graham conjecture and he brought his own expertise in combinatorial and analytic number theory to the problem. Bloom’s technique allowed him to have greater control over the approximation of the exponential sum so that in the end he succeeded in proving not that there was a solution but that the number of solutions was positive and an integer, meaning there had to be one or more solutions.

Thomas Bloom of Oxford University is the latest, but certainly not the last, mathematician to contribute to the problem of ‘How should we slice a cake?’. (Credit: Quanta Magazine)

Just another example of how mathematicians can reexamine even the oldest of problems and still find new structure, new patterns. Showing once again that mathematics is the queen of the sciences. 

Baseball Season is here at Last: The National Pastime is just full of interesting Physics, so let’s talk about how Pitchers throw all those amazing Fastballs, Curves, Sinkers and Knuckleballs.    

The new baseball season has begun and I got to attend my first ever opening day game. By the way the Phillies defeated the Oakland Athletics by a score of 9 to 5. That kind of score should be typical of Phillies games this season as team looks to score a lot of runs but their pitching is kinda suspect.

Opening Day for the Phillies in the 2022 Season. My first opening Day and best of all the Phillies won! (Credit: Sports Illustrated)

One of the best things about the sport of baseball is that with the action so spread out it makes it easy to follow all of the physics that’s happening down on the field. Whether it be the trajectory of a home run or a line drive up the middle, hey even just a broken bat ground out to shortstop it’s all physics.

Physics and Baseball, who could ask for anything more! (Credit: FIU Faculty Websites)

Of course some of the most interesting physics comes as the pitcher prepares to throw the ball to his catcher hoping that the batter will either swing at it and miss or at least hit the ball so weakly that one of the fielders can make a play and get an out. In order to accomplish this pitchers try to deceive the batter about the kind of pitch that’s coming. And pitchers have a wide variety of pitches that they can throw including fastballs, sinkers and curveballs as well as the infamous knuckleball along with variations on those pitches.

The forces acting on a baseball in flight. (Credit: Google Sites)

Now simple trajectories, like that home run, are often discussed in freshmen physics classes by ignoring the effect of wind resistance, not a bad approximation if the wind isn’t blowing too hard. The motions that pitchers can put on a ball however cannot be approximated in that way however because they are all due to the interaction between the ball and the air molecules through which it moves. And the most important factor in determining how the trajectory of a pitch deviates from a trajectory without air is the direction and orientation of the spin that the pitcher puts on the ball as he releases it.

Simple trajectory problems, like a home run are often studied in freshman physics classes. (Credit: Study.com)

Everybody knows that spin has two distinct directions, sometimes called clockwise and counter-clockwise or right handed and left handed. For a ball traveling more or less horizontally and whose axis of spin is both horizontal to the ground and perpendicular to the direction in which the ball is traveling those spin directions can be referred to as top-spin, where the top of the ball is rotating in the direction that the ball is traveling, and back-spin, where the bottom of the ball is rotating in the direction that the ball is moving. See diagrams below. Later on we will consider what happens when that axis of spin is not horizontal and perpendicular to the balls motion.

For a baseball with Topspin the top of the ball is moving in the direction of travel. (Credit: WVU Magazine – West Virginia University)
Backspin is just the opposite, the bottom of the ball is moving in the direction that the ball is traveling. (Credit: Quora)

That spin on the ball as it moves through the air generates a difference is pressure on the top and bottom of the ball causing a force on the ball due to what is known as the Magnus effect. In the Magnus effect the side of the ball moving in the direction of travel has the greater pressure and so the is pushed the other way. This means that topspin produces a downward force causing the ball to drop faster than it would in a vacuum. This sort of pitch is known as the sinker because it does just that, dropping faster than the batter anticipates causing him to either miss it entirely or hit a weak ground ball somewhere.

The Magnus force as seen in a wind tunnel. The cylinder has topspin with respect to the air flowing from the right so a downward force is generated! (Credit: Wikipedia)

Backspin does exactly the opposite, generating an upward force so that the ball seems to rise, hence a rising fastball. In actuality however the ball is still dropping due to gravity but it doesn’t drop as fast as it would in a vacuum. In this case the intent is to make the batter either miss the pitch or get under it, popping the ball up so that a fielder can catch it for an out.

In a curveball or slider the axis of spin is no longer horizontal to the ground so the ball is pushed to the left for a right handed pitcher. The opposite is true for a curve from a southpaw. (Credit: Semantic Scholar)

Back in the late 1950s a physicist at the National Bureau of Standards named Lyman J. Briggs undertook a study of the way in which the Magnus effect could change the trajectory of a baseball under typical game conditions. What he found was that the change in position when the ball arrives at the plate was proportional to the amount of spin the pitcher had put on the ball and proportional to the square of the ball’s horizontal speed. For pitch speeds of 70 to 100 miles per hour and spins of 20-30 rpm the change in position would range from between 10.8 to 17.5 inches. (Yes I know, I’m using Imperial units, please forgive me but this is baseball where the bases are 90 feet apart, the distance from the pitching rubber to home plate is 60 feet 6 inches and a baseball weighs between 5 and 5.25 ounces.)

The physics of baseball is so much fun that even NASA wants to get involved. (Credit: NASA)

O’k, so we’ve discussed the sinker and rising fastball, pitches that seem to go either down or up depending on the spin, but what about pitches that move sideways like the curveball or screwball. Well you remember I assumed above that the axis of rotation of the ball was horizontal and perpendicular to the direction that the ball is moving. What if we remove that constraint and allow a righthanded pitcher to rotate the spin axis about 45º clockwise? In that case the Magnus effect will cause the ball to move laterally to the left, a standard curveball. For a lefthanded pitcher the curveball is produced by rotating the spin axis about 45º counterclockwise and the ball will move laterally to the right.

Throwing a curveball, or other fancy pitch, is not easy on a pitcher’s arm however. Many pitching injuries stem from throwing just 30-40 of those things per game. (Credit: Wired)

And when a righthanded pitcher rotates the spin axis of the ball counterclockwise, so that it moves to the right or a lefthanded pitcher rotates the spin axis clockwise to make it move left you get a screwball. The reason the pitch is known as a screwball it is so rarely seen that its motion seems really weird, and the reason its so rarely seen is that its so dammed hard to throw.

Throwing a screwball requires spinning the ball in the opposite direction. Not an easy thing to do and even harder on a pitcher’s arm. )Credit: The New York Times)

We’ve covered most of the standard, best known pitches but I’ll finish off today with the pitch that every batter, and most pitchers really hate, the knuckleball. The essence of the knuckleball is that the pitcher does his best to put no spin on the ball, eliminating any contribution to the motion of the ball due to the Magnus effect.

With no spin the knuckle floats up and down, right and left depending on pockets of air. Even the best knuckleball pitchers have no idea where their ball is going. (Credit: Cleveland.com)

That way, as the ball moves toward the plate it gets pushed about by every little breeze, every little pocket of turbulence. A well thrown knuckleball floats and darts this way and that so that neither the batter, nor the pitcher knows where it’s going to end up. A poorly thrown knuckleball does nothing, making it an easy target for the batter to drive out of the park. So as we begin another season of our national pastime it’s worth remembering how baseball is really all about the physics!

Processed Foods are often criticized as being Hi-Calorie, Hi-Fat, Low-Nutrient causes for obesity and other health problems but is that necessarily true or could Processed Foods actually help to solve nutritional deficiencies around the World?         

Processed foods are nothing new, smoking, salting and pickling of meats and vegetables has been a common practice for thousands of years. Much of early human chemistry was devoted to processing foods for the purpose of preventing them from spoiling. In our modern world we may be able to go to the supermarket to buy fresh food whenever we want but for most of human history processing food during the summer and autumn was the only want to make certain that you’d have food to eat during the long winter.

Our remote ancestors lived exclusively on a diet of fresh food, sometimes a little to fresh. (Credit: Wikipedia)

One problem with any method of processing however is that it always removes or reduces some of the nutritious value of the food, especially the food’s vitamins which are rather delicate chemical compounds. Still, if the only thing you have to eat in the middle of January is some low-nutrient smoked bacon and pickled cabbage, also known as sauerkraut, you’ll eat it and get your vitamins from fresh food during the summer.

People have been smoking meats for thousands of years to preserve it. Today we know that smoking not only removes some of the nutrients but eating too much smoked meat is actually unhealthy. (Credit: Media Storehouse)

Over the last two centuries there has been a revolution in new methods for processing foods. Canned foods and frozen foods are now common along with many kinds of chemical preservatives that help keep food from spoiling. Supermarkets of course love such preserved foods because they can sit on the store’s shelves for months until somebody buys them while any fresh food that isn’t bought quickly has to be thrown away at a financial loss to the market.

Thanks to canning and freezing we can now have seasonal vegetables anytime of year. But again they’re not as nutritious as fresh vegetables. (Credit: Bariatric Cookery)

As more and more of the foods we eat have become processed foods the problem of low-nutrition has slowly become a bigger and bigger problem. To make matters worse the food manufacturers found ways to make their processed foods actually taste better than fresh food, usually just by increasing the fat content or the sugar content or even just by adding more salt, things that in large amounts are actually bad for our health.

I gotta be honest with ya, I love my tater chips. Greasy, salty and with almost no nutritional value, what could be better! (Credit: Amazon.com)

Meanwhile convenience stores like 7-11, Wawa or Royal Farms are becoming ever more popular by selling a wider variety of processed foods without the added space and expense necessary for fresh meats and vegetables. The same is true of the innumerable  ‘Mom and Pop’ grocery stores that seem to exist on nearly every block in most cities. These two types of grocery stores have in fact taken over much of inner city America so that now large sections of many big cities have become ‘Food Deserts’ where the only food that is readily available is unhealthy processed food instead of fresh, nutritious food.

When you’re in a hurry and you just need a few things who hasn’t gone to the local convenience store. Nowadays you can even get your gas there. (Credit: Mommy Nearest)

The result of this heavy reliance on Hi-Calorie, Low-Nutrition food has been an epidemic of obesity in this country. And with obesity comes all the health risks associated with it, especially heart disease.

Food, food everywhere and not a bit fit to eat. That’s what a food desert is. (Credit: UConn today, University of Connecticut)

So what can we do, go back to fresh foods with a very limited shelf life. Many health conscious people are doing exactly that, even to the extent of growing some of their own food, either in their backyard or in an ever increasing number of community gardens. However there are simply too many people on this planet today for that to be a complete solution, if only because of the increase in waste caused by uneaten fresh food going bad.

If you want the freshest possible food the best way is to grow it yourself, but beware, fresh food doesn’t last very long. (Credit: The Spokesman Review)

So why can’t the scientists and chemical engineers who develop processed foods find a way to make them more nutritious, lower in fat and just plain healthier? In fact there have been many attempts to do just that. Milk and Orange juice have for many years been fortified with vitamins while several brands of breakfast cereal have been made that provide both needed fiber along with loads of vitamins.

Producers of Orange Juice have been adding vitamins and minerals to their product for decades. Can’t other processed food manufacturers do the same thing? (Credit: Kroger)

Problem is that these healthy foods just don’t taste as good as the ‘bad foods’ do making it hard to convince people to switch. More work needs to be done to make processed foods better tasting and even more nourishing.

At the forefront of the drive to make processed foods more healthy comes Incredible Foods Co. (Credit: Incredible Foods)

Enter David Edwards, Professor of Engineering at Harvard University, Founder and Board Member of Incredible Foods Inc. and now operator of the restaurant Café ArtScience in Cambridge Massachusetts. For years Professor Edwards has been at work developing new varieties of food products that are delicious, nutritious and have zero impact on the environment.

Professor Davis Edwards of Harvard University is revolutionizing the processed food industry. (Credit: Xconomy)

Take WikiWater for example. Inside a hard shell made of a biodegradable corn derived protein, no plastics, water is contained within an edible skin packed with vitamins and other nutrients. Edwards hopes that WikiWater will replace the current plastic water bottles and help lessen the thirst of people in third world countries. Less trash with better nutrition, sounds like a good idea to me!

Another of David Edwards ideas is inhalable insulin. No longer is a needle necessary for diabetics to get their insulin. (Credit: Afrezza)

Professor Edwards made his first big contribution with an inhalable form of insulin for diabetics. Since founding Incredible Foods he and his team have been busy creating a new line of products they call ‘Food Berries’. Food Berries are small, fruit flavoured snacks that are contained inside an edible skin that is not only packed with vitamins but also provides the Food Berry with a considerable shelf life. There are also Hummus and Yogurt varieties of food berries along with a frozen, ice cream style.

Nutritious, environmentally friendly, long lasting and best of all tasty Food Berries from Incredible Foods are processed foods that are good for you. (Credit: FinSMEs)
A few other products from Incredible Foods, Sea Salt Caramel sounds real good to me. (Credit: Incredible Foods)

So yes we can develop new types of food that are tasty, healthy, long lasting and environmentally friendly. Thanks to scientists like David Edwards we have the technology, we can have processed foods that are actually better than fresh foods. All we need is for our leaders to recognize the problem and do something to solve it.

Geologists are making new discoveries that reveal the inner structure and workings of our planet Earth.     

Back about fifty years ago now the science of Geology underwent a revolution in thought as overwhelming evidence supporting the theory of ‘Plate Tectonics’ was uncovered. The basic idea of plate tectonics is that the surface of the globe is broken into a number of plates that the continents sit upon. Those plates move, extremely slowly, only centimeters per year but they do move and as they move they jostle and crash against one another causing earthquakes to occur, mountains ranges and volcanoes to be born.

The major Tectonic Plates of the Earth. Where these plates meet are the geologically active regions of the world with earthquakes, volcanoes and mountain building. (Credit: Wikipedia)

Sometimes one plate is forced under another, and when that happens a ‘subduction zone’ is created and one of the geologic features that can occur in such a zone is a deep-water trench such as the Marianas Trench, the deepest place in all of the oceans. The Marianas Trench is in fact only one of about a dozen trenches that are a part of the famous ‘Ring of Fire’ surrounding the Pacific Ocean. The precise mechanics of how these subduction zones are generated is very complicated, several attempts have been made to develop numerical models for analyzing them with computers.

Deeper than Mount Everest is high the Marianas Trench in only one of a dozen trenches that ring the Pacific Plate. (Credit: Youngzine)
The three ways that Tectonic Plates can interface. Subduction zones occur at convergent plate boundaries. (Credit: Science Sparks)

Now a new such model developed at the Instituto Dom Luiz at the University of Lisbon in Portugal has shown great promise in providing a more comprehensive and accurate picture of subduction zone evolution. This new simulation is different from previous models in that it is a full scale three-dimensional reproduction of what is going on at a subduction zone. In the program all of the dynamic forces that effect the generation and evolution of subduction zones were realistically incorporated, including gravity.

While Plate Tectonics gives us a general idea of what is going on at a Subduction Zone we need a much more detailed analysis if we hope to predict such events as earthquakes and volcanoes. (Credit: Volcano Discovery)

Such large scale simulations can require a lot of computer time; in fact each analysis using this new model takes as much as a full week to process using the supercomputer at Johannes Gutenberg University in Germany. Still the results are well worth the effort. According to Jaime Almeida, first author on the study. “Subduction zones are one of the main features of our planet and the main driver of plate tectonics and the global dynamics of the planet.”

Modern Supercomputers are performing calculations so large that they can even model events with millions of variables with constantly changing parameters. (Credit: The Atlantic)

Plate Tectonics has taught us much about the broad outline of how the surface of our Earth has changed over billions of years. However a more precise and accurate model of the processes involved may help us better understand, and therefore predict the disasters like earthquakes and volcanoes that are a common threat around the world.

Millions of people live next door to volcanoes and unexpected eruptions are major disasters. The ability to better predict such eruptions is a major goal of geology. (Credit: The Atlantic)

Now I’d like to take a moment to update a geology story that I posted about back on the 24th of June 2020 and 10th of April 2021. The story concerned the discovery of two huge, massive blobs that exist deep within the Earth’s mantel. These blobs are formally known as Large Low-Shear Velocity Provinces (LLSVPs) and differ in composition and viscosity from the surrounding material deep within the Earth. (Previously these blobs were known as Ultra Low Velocity Zones or ULVZs). The LLSVPs were detected because; being made of different materials the vibrations caused by earthquakes travel through them at a lower velocity, hence Low-Shear Velocity. They were discovered by analyzing the data from hundreds of earthquakes as measured by seismographs from around the world.

There are two big blobs of material buried deep beneath the surface of the Earth. Known as Large Low Shear Velocity Zones they are one of the big mysteries in the science of Geology. (Credit: ScienceDirect.com)

The two LLSVPs are situated one beneath South Africa and the other beneath the Pacific Ocean and are each the size of a continent with a thickness of greater than 500 km. Also, it has been speculated that the blobs may in fact be the remnants of an ancient planet called Theia that collided with the Earth four and a half billion years ago fragments of which then became our Moon.

About four and a half billion years ago a planet the size of Mars collided with the early Earth. Named Theia some of that planet’s material went on to become our moon. The possibility that the LLSVZs may be fragments of Theia has been suggested, and would be really cool! (Credit: Wikipedia)

Now a new analysis of the LLSVPs by Qian Yuan and Mingming Li of Arizona State University’s School of Earth and Space Exploration has been published in the journal Nature Science. In the article the researchers assert that the LLSVP under Africa is almost 1000 km further from the center of the Earth, and therefore closer to the surface than the one under the Pacific. In an attempt to explain this difference in height the researchers hypothesize that the Africa LLSVP could be less dense and therefore it may be ever so slowly rising through the Earth’s mantel. “The Africa LLSVP may have been rising in recent geological time,” states author Li. “This may explain the elevating surface topography and intense volcanism in eastern Africa.”

Geologists probe the interior of our planet by studying the vibration caused by earthquakes. Primary (P) waves can pass through the liquid core at Earth’s center while the Secondary (S) cannot. The LLSVZs were discovered by a careful analysis of those P and S waves. (Credit:

It is harder to study what goes on just a few hundred kilometers beneath our feet than it is to study the surface of the Moon or Mars, certainly we’ve sent more probes to the Moon or Mars than we have to a hundred kilometers down. Nevertheless bit by bit geologists are learning the secrets of the planet we all call home.

Astronomy News for March 2022: How do Supermassive Black Holes form? News observations of a pair of Supermassive Black Holes may tell us a great deal about their origin.     

Twenty years ago the idea that some of the largest galaxies possessed a ‘Supermassive Black Hole’ in their center was a major discovery. Since that time more and more evidence has accumulated that every galaxy, even many small ones, possess such black holes whose mass can be anywhere from tens of millions to billions of times that of our Sun. One of the major questions in astronomy today is whether supermassive black holes came first and formed galaxies around them or does the formation of galaxies lead to the creation of supermassive black holes. By the way, this is a question that it is hoped the new James Webb Space Telescope may provide some evidence to help answer.

Once known as Quasars, now referred to as Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) Supermassive Black Holes that are feeding on the material around them are the most energetic objects in the Universe. (Credit: Space.com)

One thing we do know is that big galaxies form by combining smaller galaxies, or more often by a big galaxy gobbling up a small one. Our own Milky Way is now known to have gobbled up as many as a half dozen smaller galaxies over the last billion years or so. So what happened to the supermassive black holes in those now consumed galaxies, are they wandering around somewhere in our galaxy or did they become absorbed by the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole.

There are currently many competing models of galaxy formation. Here’s one. (Credit: ResearchGate)

Probably both. If the two galaxies strike each other in a glancing blow the black holes at their centers may never come within tens of thousands of light years of each other and may wander around separately for billions of years. On the other hand astronomers think that sometimes the black holes can become entangled and will then begin to orbit each other. If that occurs the two supermassive black holes will start to emit gravity waves so that slowly the energy of their orbit will radiate away causing them to move closer and closer until they merge.

The LIGO and Virgo Gravity Wave Observatories have now observed dozens of stellar sized black hole mergers. A merger between two supermassive black holes will be a real event! (Credit: The Indian Express)

Evidence for the latter scenario has recently been uncovered and published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. The evidence comes from a black hole situated in a galaxy about 9 billion light years away, which you will remember means that the events we are watching actually took place 9 billion years ago. The supermassive black hole, which has been designated as PKS 2131-021, is devouring a considerable amount of matter. A small amount of that matter is escaping from the black hole in the form of a high energy jet. Such objects are called Blazars and it so happens that PKS 2131-021’s jet is pointing right at Earth giving us an excellent look at what is going on.

The Supermassive Black Hole designated as PKS 2131-021 is actually two massive black holes orbiting each other. The gravity waves given off by the black holes is causing them to come closer together until, some day they will merge. (Credit: Live Science)

And recent observations have shown that the energy from PKS 2131-021 fluctuates on a regular basis, around every two years the intensity dips slightly only to soon recover. Checking data going back 45 years from five observatories the researchers confirmed their own observations.

Some of the data obtained from PKS 2131-021, the two black holes are pretty obvious. (Credit: CatTech)

The astronomers hypothesize that the cause of the variation could be another supermassive black hole in a tight orbit around PKS 2131-021, the tightest known orbit for a pair of supermassive black holes. Using Einstein’s Theory of Gravity the astronomers have calculated that the two black holes should merge in about 10,000 years or so and when they do they will produce massive amounts of gravity waves that will the shake the fabric of space-time throughout the observable Universe.

To Newton Space and Time were separate, fixed, unalterable. To Einstein both space and time are connected and a lot more flexible. (Credit: Forber)

In previous posts, 7 October 2017, 22 October 2017 and 23 September 2020, I have talked about the LIGO and Virgo laser gravity wave observatories and how over the last ten years they have succeeded in capturing the final outbursts from mergers of several pairs of stellar mass black holes, black holes with masses 5-10 times that of our Sun. So far however they haven’t observed gravity waves from pairs of Supermassive black holes, such events are very rare even in the entire Universe. Perhaps with a few more upgrades however they might be able to start picking up the gravity waves already coming from PKS 2131-021.

LIGO consists of two gravity wave interferometers. This one in Washington state and another identical one in Louisiana. (Credit: LIGO CalTech)

Astronomers will continue to study PKS 2131-021, with both gravity wave observatories and more old fashion telescopes hoping to learn more of its secrets. The more astronomers observe the Universe the more common Supermassive Black Holes have become so that it’s a good question. Does the Universe consist of Galaxies of stars with Supermassive Black Holes at their hearts, or does it consist of Supermassive Black Holes with a halo of stars around them?

Archaeology News for March 2022     

Even while the Covid-19 pandemic continues to rage around the world scientists have been reexamining the pandemics of the past in their efforts to uncover something useful for their fight against Covid. In these posts I have already mentioned the ‘Spanish Flu’ pandemic of 1919-1920 and its similarity to Covid-19.

Even during the ‘Spanish Flu’ pamdemic of a hundred years ago there were people too stupid to put on their masks. (Credit: Wikipedia)

Now a team of researchers at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History has published a new study in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution of arguably the best known plague of all time, the ‘Black Death’ of the mid 14th century. Caused by the bacteria Yersinia pestis the bubonic plague is considered to have been responsible for the death of as much as 50% of the population of Europe between the years 1347 to 1352.

Bring out your dead was no joke during the middle of the 14th century as bubonic plague took the life of as much as half the people in Europe. (Credit: Critical Specator)

Like all of our knowledge of history, what we know about the Black Death comes from those people who kept the records of that time, the literate people who lived in the towns or monasteries. Those records tell us much about the heavy toll the plague took on the people who lived in those communities. Unfortunately those records tell us very little about what was happening to the country people, the peasants, who made up more than 75% of the population in Europe back then.

Yersinia pestis, the bacteria that causes the black death. It may look harmless but ever today in some parts of the world it takes its toll. (Credit: CDC)
Much of our knowledge of the Middle Ages comes from the writings of the few people who could read and write, and most of them were monks in monasteries. (Credit: by Sterling Lynch)

In order to correct for this urban basis in our knowledge of the effect of the Black Death the team from Max Planck used a new archaeological technique called Palynology, which is the study of fossil plant spores and pollen. The rational for the study was this, if the death rate due to the plague among the rural population was a high as it was in the cities and towns, about 50%, then large areas of once cultivated land should have reverted to wilderness in the years after 1352. Such a large scale change in the flora would be reflected in the kind of pollen that was deposited into the ground from that time.

The size shape and ‘spikiness’ of pollen grains varies so greatly that it makes it possible for experts to identify the species of plant that the pollen comes from. (Credit: Wikipedia)
 

The researchers collected pollen samples from over 1,600 sites spread throughout Europe and analyzed them. What they found was that the mortality caused by the plague varied widely from location to location, with some rural areas like those in Germany and Italy being hit just as hard as nearby cities while other localities suffered far less. Ireland, for example showed hardly any change at all.

Rational behind the pollen study to the mortality caused by the black death. Areas of Europe that had high mortality would see a change in the variety of vegetation, and hence fossil pollen, while areas that were unaffected would see little change in the pollen. (Credit: The Conversation)

These results correlate well with what epidemiologists are seeing today. Covid-19 may be a worldwide pandemic but how it effects each and every human being depends very much on local conditions where they live.

While Covid-19 has spread worldwide its effects haven’t been equally as deadly everywhere. Some nations have been badly hit while others only slightly. (Credit: ResearchGate)

On a lighter note another team of archaeologists with the Max Plank Institute for the Science of Human History have unearthed an Old Stone Age site not 160 kilometers from present day Beijing in China. The site, which is in the Nihewan Basin to the northwest of the Chinese capital and has been given the name Xiamabei, was carbon dated to between 39,000 and 41,000 years ago and consists of a layer of remains that had been buried about 2.5 meters beneath the surface. During their excavations the archaeologists found and removed 380 small stone tools and artifacts along with 430 mammal bones.

The site was also identifiable by several artifacts that had been stained red by the mineral ochre, which is known to have been used by many primitive cultures as a dye because of its resemblance to the colour of blood. The Xiamabei site is the oldest ochre culture site to have been found in the Far East but the pigment is known to have been used in Europe and Africa as long ago as 300,000 years.

Archaeologists excavating the Nihewan Old Stone Age site west of Beijing. (Credit: SciTechDaily)
 
The use of red Ochre as a pigment has been attested in many Stone Age cultures throughout the Old World. (Credit: ResearchGate)

 According to co-author Shixia Yang, a scientist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, “The remains seemed to be in their original spots after the site was abandoned by the residents. Based on this, we can reveal a vivid picture of how people lived 40,000 years ago in eastern Asia.”

The use of red Ochre as a pigment has been attested in many Stone Age cultures throughout the Old World. (Credit: ResearchGate)
 

One big question left unanswered by the investigation so far is exactly what kind of human beings lived at the Xiamabei local. 40,000 years ago the residents could have been modern Homo sapiens but they could also have been either Neanderthals or Denisovans, the lack of any human bones makes it impossible to be certain. However a slightly younger, nearby location called Tianyuandong, lying about 110 kilometers away, has had remains of H sapiens identified there so the likelihood is that the Xiamabei site was made by our direct ancestors.

What’s the difference between Neanderthals and Modern Humans, not really all that much! (Credit: Quora)

Just another couple of stories about the science of archaeology uncovering small bits of our past.

For Billions of Years Bacteria have been recycling the waste produced by other creatures. Now Scientists have developed a genetically modified strain of Bacteria that can convert Carbon Dioxide into useful chemicals.      

If human civilization is to survive on this planet we must learn how to recycle the industrial chemicals that make modern society. That’s all there is to it. We cannot continue to produce plastics and them just throw them away without them clogging our rivers and oceans. We cannot go on manufacturing Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) without them leaking out and destroying the ozone layer. And most of all we cannot persist in burning fossil fuels and just releasing CO2 into the atmosphere without catastrophic effects on our climate.

Every day in every way we’re just turning more and more of our planet into a Trash Dump! (Credit: JSTOR Daily)

It shouldn’t be too hard to accomplish. After all nature somehow managed to recycle the chemicals of life over and over again for billions of years without waste products accumulating and becoming a problem. Life here on Earth had evolved into a well tuned machine that took energy from the Sun and used it to cycle carbon through many different creatures. Much of that recycling was done by some of the simplest creatures, bacteria, who took the waste products, or corpses of larger living things and broke down the complex chemicals of ‘higher life forms’ so that they could be used again and again. Perhaps then, it might be a good idea for us to if possible find or otherwise develop strains of bacteria that can consume some of our waste products and convert them into substances that are not harmful, or perhaps even useful.

Over millions of years Mother Nature has developed countless Food Chains or Food Webs that succeed in endlessly cycling carbon without producing any harmful pollution. (Credit: YouTube)
Very few species of bacteria actually cause disease. Most live by consuming dead plant and animal material and turning it back into fertilizer that plants can absorb as nutrients. (Credit: Microbiology Society)

That is exactly what researchers at Northwestern University and the firm LanzaTech are doing. What the scientists have done is to select and modify a strain of bacteria in order to enable them to absorb CO2 and convert it into the useful chemicals acetone and isopropanol (IPA).

A leader in the field of waste recycling LanzaTech is developing new strains of bacteria to use in fermenting waste material that otherwise would just become pollution. (Credit: Polyestertime)

Both Acetone and IPA are industrial chemicals that are manufactured in large quantities from petroleum in processes that emit significant amounts of CO2. Acetone is a well known solvent for both plastics and synthetic fibers as well as being the most commonly used nail polish remover. On the other hand IPA is the main ingredient in many disinfectants including two that are recommended by the World Health Organization for their ability to kill the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Together these two compounds have a yearly sales market of over $10 billion. Techniques that could manufacture these chemicals in an environmentally friendly way would be a major step forward in developing a sustainable economy.

In addition to many industrial uses Acetone is best known as the main ingredient in nail polish remover! (Credit: Martha Stewart)

And new gas fermentation process that produces Acetone and IPA developed by Northwestern actually removes CO2 from the atmosphere helping to reduce the green house gasses already put there by power station and gas burning vehicles. Starting with an anaerobic (Non-oxygen breathing) bacterium called Clostridium autoethanogenum the researchers at LanzaTech succeeded in reprogramming the bacterium to ferment CO2 out of the air and convert it to IPA and acetone. As related by study co-author Michael Jewett, “By harnessing our capacity to partner with biology to make what is needed, on a sustainable and renewable basis, we can begin to take advantage of the available CO2 to transform the bioeconomy.”

Judging by this facility outside Chicago LanzaTech is making considerable progress in its goal to remove CO2 from the air and turn it into useful products. (Credit: The Business Journals)

Just another example of how building a sustainable society doesn’t have to mean going back to the Middle Ages. We can protect our planet, and all of the creatures on it if we just use our brains and are willing to try new techniques for manufacturing those products that a modern society requires. Bioengineering can help us to develop a bioeconomy, an economy that can work with the Earth instead of poisoning it.

The technology of the Middle Ages simply cannot support the number of people living on our planet today so we just cannot go back. Instead we must use our technology to solve our problems rather than simply hoping that if we ignore them they’ll go away. (Credit: Pinterest)

Paleontology News for March 2022: Several New Species that Illustrate the Diversity of Life throughout Earth’s Past.     

If you think about it, the most impressive thing about life here on Earth is its enormous variety. Looking at some of the more unusual species of life around the world makes you wonder just what limits there are to the kind of creature evolution can come up with. Consider the nudibranch and the millipede, the flying squirrel and the flying snake or how ’bout just the duck billed platypus all by itself!

No legs (Nudibranch Left) and many legs (Millipede right) evolution has tried it all! (Credit: Ikelite / ResearchGate)
Flying Squirrel (l) and Flying Snake (r), again how does evolution manage to accomplish the same task in so many different ways? (Credit: Lewisboro Field Guide / New York Post)

It’s hardly surprising therefore that in the long history of life there should be many creatures that are even stranger. As I usually do I’ll begin my discussion of new unusual fossils in the distant past and work my way forward in time.  

Considered to be the top predator of its days Anomalocaris was a strange shrimp indeed! (Credit: Wired)

Many of the strangest creatures ever found have come from the Burgess Shale fossil site in British Columbia. Even the names of some of the species discovered there indicate how strange they are. Anomalocaris (literally strange shrimp) and Halluciogenia (literally a hallucination) are two of the best known but over the last several decades both of these animals have had several related species uncovered in other fossil sites so that the taxonomy of these ‘weird wonders’ is now better understood.

Hallucinogena is another of the wield wonders of the Burgess Shale but like Anomalocaris paleontologists have found other, similar creatures so that they are no longer quite so unique. (Credit: National Geographic)

Not so Opabinia, a five-eyed creature with a backward facing mouth, segmented body with flaps instead of legs and a long elephant-like nose. Although Opabinia had been first described by Walcott in 1912 as an unusual arthropod it was only in 1975 when paleontologist Harry Whittington dissected specimens of the creature using techniques he himself had developed that Opabinia was recognized as the bizarre creature we now know. And in the years since then Opabinia remained a unique creature with no known relatives.

Over the last fifty years however Opabinia has remained unique, no related species of any kind, until now. (Credit: Simple Wikipedia)

Until now, for a reinterpretation of a fossil from the 500 million year old middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation in Utah by lead author Steven Pates of Harvard’s Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology has found another member of Opabinia’s family. The fossil has been named Utaurora comosa and was first described in 2008 as a relative of Anomalocaris.

Despite its proboscis being broken off otherwise Utaurora comosa is quite similar to Opabinia. (Credit: Wikipedia)

While U comosa does possess some similarities to Anomalocaris the re-evaluation by the team at Harvard clearly shows that the species bears a striking resemblance to Opabinia. Unfortunately the anterior nose of U comosa has broken off making an exact comparison to Opabinia’s nose impossible. However there does appear to be enough left to assert that the proboscis of U comosa seems to be smaller. At the same time the tail flaps of U comosa appear slightly different, more fan like.

Looks like a great place to go fossil hunting the Wheeler Formation in Utah is famous for its Cambrian Trilobites! (Credit: Utah Geological Survey – Utah.gov)

The Wheeler Formation is several million years younger than the Burgess shale so perhaps U comosa is a slightly evolved descendant of Opabinia. In any case Opabina is no longer unique, it has a relative and as more such relatives are found the family’s position in the tree of life will become clearer.

Moving about 50 million years into the future the dominant creature of the Silurian seas were giant sea scorpions, formally known as eurypterids. Ancestors to both modern scorpions and spiders, sea scorpions were predators like their descendants and some species grew to over a meter in length making them among the largest of all arthropods.

In some cases as large as a man the Eurypterids were the top predators during the Silurian period. Related to modern scorpions they certainly look quite nasty. (Credit: The Irish Times)

Now a new species of eurypterid has been identified in Australia that is the largest specimen discovered in the land down under. The fossil itself had been unearthed years ago and left stored in the Queensland Museum in Australia but only recently has it been thoroughly examined. Realizing that the fossil was that of an eurypterid the creature is estimated to have been as much as a meter in length and has been given the formal name of Woodwardopterus freemanorum.

The Fossilized head of Woodwardopterus freemanorum was lying unexamined in a museum drawer for decades before someone realized just what it was. (Credit: Phys.org)
Artists impression of what W freemanorum looked like. (Credit: List23)

Of course even the largest creatures of the Cambrian and Silurian periods were small compared to the later dinosaurs. And the largest, best known predator from the age of the dinosaurs was the famous Tyrannosaurus rex or just T rex. One thing about the T rex that sooner or later everybody finds curious are the two tiny, seemingly useless arms that the giant meat eater possessed. Did those petite appendages have any use at all or were they vestigial organs, like our own appendix, useless but not yet eliminated by evolution.

Ever since it was first discovered paleontologists have wonder what, if anything T rex did with those tiny arms! (Credit: DW)

Now a new species of large predatory dinosaur has been discovered in the Los Blanquitos Formation in the Amblayo region in the north of Argentina whose arms are comparatively even shorter than T rex’s. Named Guemesia ochoai by its discoverers from the Natural History Museum in London the animal belongs to a family of dinosaurs called the abelisaur who were distantly related to the Tyrannosaurs that roamed North America at approximately the same time.

A South American relative of T rex Guemesia ochoai possessed even smaller, and presumably less useful arms. (Credit: Phys.org)

As a group abelisaurs were 5 to 10 meters in length and used their powerful heads and jaws to seize and kill their victims. The researchers who described G ochoai were not exactly certain of the creature’s size because the specimen they unearthed could have been a Juvenal. The major difference between the abelisaurs and the northern Tyrannosaurs was that the southern theropods had shorter, deeper skulls that often bore crests or bumps on it.

The major difference between the southern abelisaurs and T rex and its relative appears to be a shorter face and bumps on the skull. (Credit: Blogtuan.info)

 Regardless of the actual adult size of G ochoai that fact that large, predatory dinosaurs on two continents both evolved arms that were so small as to be practically useless tells us a lot about the way they attacked their prey. If you think about it however, in our modern world wolves take down their prey without using their forelegs, it’s all just teeth and jaws.

For great white Sharks it’s all about teeth and jaws. Maybe it was the same for both T rex and G ochoai so that their arms just got smaller and smaller. (Credit: 9news)

So maybe the animals from the past weren’t that different from those of today, they faced the same challenges and came up with pretty much the same solutions.