Sexual Selection, Darwin’s second mechanism driving evolution is successful is describing many of the physiological traits of species, but did Darwin get part of it backwards?

In 1859 Charles Darwin changed the world with the publication of his most famous work “On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection” commonly referred to simply as The Origin of Species. In that book Darwin provided an enormous amount of evidence for the existence of evolution as a phenomenon, that is he presented a wide variety of examples of how populations of living creatures do change with time, even on occasion splitting into different species. (Darwin by the way never liked the term evolution preferring the simpler, and more accurate “Descent with Modification”.)

A first edition of Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” can be your for a mere $400,000 USD!!! (Credit: Raptis Rare Books)

In Origin of Species Darwin also proposed natural selection as a mechanism that drove evolution. According to natural selection on occasion an individual is born with a new trait caused by a mutation. How these mutations occur Darwin had no idea, biology at that time had no knowledge of genes or DNA, but he had plenty of evidence that they did in fact occur. If the new trait was advantageous to the individual in their environment then that individual would live longer than the other members of its species and more importantly, have more offspring who would inherit the advantageous trait. Again Darwin had no knowledge of how traits were inherited he just knew that they were. Before long the population with the advantageous trait would have out bred those without it and over time, advantageous trait by advantageous trait the species would adapt better to living in its environment. It would evolve.

How to evolve from a dog-like land animal to a whale! All by natural selection. (Credit: Live science)
Darwin had no knowledge of DNA or how inherited traits were passed on from parent to offspring, he just knew they were. (Credit: Medical News Today)

But even as he argued the case for natural selection Darwin realized that there were some traits, like the long ornate feathers on a peacock or the large antlers on deer, which did not provide any obvious advantage to individuals of the species that possessed them. Darwin noticed that these traits that natural selection could not explain always seemed to be related to a difference between the male and female of the species, peahens do not have long ornate feathers nor do female deer have antlers for example. Such traits are technically called sexual dimorphisms, which Darwin realized arise because males, who produce a large number of sperm cells, benefit by having sex with as many females as possible while females, who produce a smaller number of egg cells, benefit by reproducing with the best possible males.

The gorgeous feathers of the male peacock are the classic example of ‘Sexual Selection’ since the ornate feathers do not aid the bird in any way except attracting a female. (Credit: How Stuff Works)

In Origin of Species Darwin suggested that these traits might have evolved so that an individual might gain an advantage, not in living longer but in having sex more often and called this driver of evolution Sexual Selection. In his later book “The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex” Darwin expanded on the workings of sexual selection to describe the fighting of male elephant seals, the displays of male birds of paradise and even the calls of male songbirds.

The sometimes deadly fight between male elephant are also all about females. In order to win access to females the males have grown to more than twice the mass of their mates. Another example of sexual selection. (Credit: Scientific American)

As an example of how sexual selection works I’ll use a species of fish that I used to keep in my aquarium as a kid, the swordtail. A native species of Central America only the male swordtail has the elongation at the bottom of the tail that gives the species its name. It is a sexual dimorphism. Anyone who has kept these fish as pets knows that female swordtails prefer to mate with those males who have the longest tail and so those males have more offspring and over time the species gets longer tailed males.

A popular fish for aquariums only the swordtail male has the extension that the species is named for. Like the male peacock’s feathers the sword tail is for display not for fighting. (Credit: YouTube)

But it works on the females also. Those females who have the stronger preference for long tailed males will not only mate with those males first, but more often producing more female offspring who prefer longer tails. Sexual selection drives both sexes toward greater enhancement of the sexual trait. And in the years since Darwin’s time many examples of sexual selection have been studied largely confirming his views.

Male Red Deer fighting for the chance to mate. Another classic example of sexual selection. (Credit: Discover Wildlife)

Darwin also theorized that since it was the males who competed for the females sexual selection would become more important in species where males outnumbered females, making the competition that much more important. In other words with few females around a male would have to work harder in order to be able to mate. Recent studies however have indicated that in this one instance Darwin may have gotten things exactly backwards.

Evolutionary biologist Tamas Szekely of the University of Bath in the UK working in the field. (Credit: University of Bath)

A new paper with lead author Tamas Szekely, Professor of Biodiversity at the Milner Center for Evolution at the University of Bath presents evidence from 462 species of mammals, reptiles and birds. The study measured the strength of sexual selection on a species by the ratio of male weight to female weight. As an example consider elephant seals where the males can weight more than twice what a female weights and where the males fight tremendous battles between themselves in order to maintain a harem of females. In the species studied what the researchers found that competition amongst males was actually strongest in those species where females outnumbered males.

A lion pride usually consists of 6-12 related females with only one or two unrelated males. A recent study has found evidence that the force of sexual selection actually is strongest in species where the females outnumber the males. (Credit: Quora)

The researchers also examined some of the ways that one sex can outnumber the other in a species, since most species of vertebrate start with a 1:1 ratio at birth. Sometimes predation can be the cause of the imbalance as in the way African lions kill about six times as many male buffalo as females because males tend to graze alone while females are more likely to stay in large herds where they’re more protected. And of course the violent competition between males for females, such as in elephant seals and lions, will also lead to an shortage of males increasing the strength of sexual selection still further. Sexual selection is a powerful force in nature generating many of the odd and unusual features we see in the animals around us. Even if Darwin did get one facet of it wrong his discovery of and description of sexual selection is another one of the great achievements of that great scientist.

The Cambrian explosion, did all of the major forms of life on Earth appear in a flash? New study measures the pace of evolution during the Cambrian.

“I cannot doubt that all the Silurian trilobites have descended from one crustacean, which must have lived long before the Silurian age…Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian strata was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian to the present day…The case must at present remain inexplicable; and may be truely urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”

Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859

Charles Darwin (Credit: Public Domain)

You have to admire the sort of person who points out the flaws in their theories before their critics get a chance to. First of all it shows that they’re honest enough to admit they don’t know everything, that even the best ideas aren’t perfect. Yet at the same time by pointing out the problems in their work up front they take some of the wind out of their opponent’s sails.

What we now call the Cambrian explosion was just such a problem for Darwin and his theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. Examining the fossil record, it appears as if all of the major forms of animal life, everything from arthropods to mollusks, segmented worms to starfish all came into being somewhere between 550 and 500 million years ago. The image below shows what kind of life inhabited the Cambrian.

Cambrian Life (Credit: Osha News)

That was the way it appeared to Darwin back in 1859, but in the 150 years since then we have made some progress. We now have an enormous amount of evidence for single-celled life forms dating back more than two billion years before the Cambrian. We also now have fossils of a group of multi-cellular creatures that lived 60-80 million years before the Cambrian, known as the Ediacarana fossils. Nevertheless, the Cambrian explosion is still one of the biggest problems in evolutionary theory. The image below shows how the diversity of life grew during the Cambrian.

Chart of the Cambrian Explosion (Credit: Royal Ontario Museum)

A new paper has been published by a team of paleontologists at Oxford University and the University of Lausanne which asserts that, while the rate of evolution was very high during the Cambrian the major changes were spread out over the entire 50 million year period, a really slow explosion in other words. According to lead author Professor Allison Daley of Oxford’s Museum of Natural History ‘…the Cambrian explosion, rather than being a sudden event, unfolded gradually over the ~40 million years of the lower to middle Cambrian.”

What Professor Daley and her colleagues did was to carry out the most comprehensive survey of the early fossil group Euarthropoda, a group that includes all of the arthropods (insects, spiders, crustaceans and trilobites etc.) along with similar now extinct creatures. What they found was that during the Cambrian radiation of the Euarthropoda into distinct sub-groups and species took place at a high but nevertheless steady rate over the period of ~40 million years.

At the same time a number of different physiological characteristics, such as an exo-skeleton, jointed limbs, compound eyes and the earliest biting jaws came into existence, but again gradually, one part at a time. In precise detail Professor Daley et al show how the Euarthropoda grew and diversified throughout the Cambrian, rapidly but not explosively. The paper estimates that the speed of evolution during the Cambrian was about five times that in the many years since.

Still the paper leaves unanswered the question of why the rate of evolution should have been five times higher during the fifty million years of the Cambrian. Several possible explanations for the high rate of evolution during the Cambrian have been advanced over the last several decades; arguable the two best are interrelated.

The first explanation proposes that the evolution of the first predator species caused other species to have evolved rapidly in order to develop some means of protection from the predators. Naturalists have in fact studied the effect of inserting a predator into a previously peaceful ecological niche and have found that the rate of evolutionary charge increases dramatically.

The second explanation deals with one of those means of protection, the development of hard parts. It was in fact during the Cambrian period that the first animals with hard parts, shells and exo-skeletons, evolved. Combining these two ideas some evolutionary biologists have described the Cambrian explosion as an arms race with new species finding new ways to eat other species while the other species desperately try to find new ways to not get eaten.

Whatever the cause, the Cambrian period was the time when both the kinds of living creatures and the modes of living that we recognize today came into existence. Explosion or not it was a very important period indeed.