Space News for February 2025: Unmanned Probes make some News. 

It seems as though my last several space news posts have all been about manned space flight, either to the International Space Station or beyond, back to the Moon. I don’t want to give the impression that our unmanned probes haven’t been making any discoveries or advancing our ability to explore the solar system so in this post I’ll be discussing the latest news about unmanned space exploration and I’ll begin with the big news from the Parker Solar Probe.

Artist’s impression of the Parker Solar Probe making the closest ever approach to the Sun of any man made object. The thermal shield that protected Parker from the Sun’s heat is on the left facing the Sun. (Credit: Science Friday)

Launched in 2018 the Parker Solar Probe is named for Eugene Parker, a NASA astrophysicist who back in the 1950s predicted the existence of the Solar Wind. The solar wind is the never creasing stream of sub-atomic particles that flow outward from the Sun for about 20 billion kilometers creating a bubble around our solar system. See my post of 18 December 2019. During its six-year mission so far the Parker probe has crept ever closer to the Sun using gravity boosts from both the Earth and Venus to alter its orbit.

Eugene Parker discussing the solar wind whose existence he predicted. (Credit: ScienceAlert)

In its last close flyby in 2023 Parker set records for both proximity to the Sun, at a distance of 6.2 million kilometers as well as fastest speed ever attained by a human built object, 635, 266 kilometers per hour. Remember the Sun’s gravitational field is so much stronger than Earth’s that a space probe traveling close to it has to travel at an enormous speed in order to not get sucked in!

The velocity of an object orbiting a planet or star increases as the object gets closer to the planet or star. (Credit: YouTube)

But on the 24th of December 2024 Parker was scheduled to break both of those records with an even closer approach to the Sun at a distance of only 6.1 million kilometers and reaching a speed of 692,000 kilometers per hour. Getting so close to the Sun is obviously a dangerous maneuver not only because of the enormous heat, estimated at 980º C, but also because of the energy of the particles in the solar wind which can easily destroy sensitive electronics.

Sometimes the Sun erupts in massive solar flares but even when the Sun is quiet it is still constantly emitting super-heated plasma of enormous energy that could prove deadly to the electronics on a space probe. (Credit: The Wonder of Science)

To protect the spacecraft’s instruments from the worst of Sun’s energy Parker has an 11.5 cm thick carbon composite shield that is kept facing the Sun. Nevertheless as the probe makes its closest approach to the Sun the Space Agency knew that they would lose all radio contact with it, NASA did not know that Parker had survived until two days later on December 26th.

With radio antennas like this one in Madrid, Spain NASA’s deep space network maintains communication with its interplanetary probes like Parker. (Credit: Jet Propulsion Labouratory)

Even after receiving the signal that Parker was in good shape NASA still had to wait until New Year’s Day before the spacecraft could begin transmitting back the data it had collected at its closest approach to the Sun. Meanwhile Parker is scheduled to make two more flybys of our Sun, on March 22nd and June 19th of 2025 although neither will be quite as close as the one on December 24th.

Parker isn’t finished with the Sun just yet. The probe will make two more close approaches to our star this year! (Credit: NASA Science)

Meanwhile, not too far away the European Space Agency’s (ESA) BepiColombo probe made its fifth flyby of the planet Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun on the first of December 2024. Like Parker, BepiColombo is using the gravity of Mercury in order to change its trajectory so that in 2026 the spacecraft can go into a permanent orbit around the solar system’s smallest planet. Even though the encounter on the first was only a flyby the scientists at the ESA still used the occasion to check out their instruments by making detailed observations of Mercury, particularly the probe’s infrared spectrograph. 

Actually two space probes in one BepiColombo consists of the Mercury Planetary Orbiter (l) and the Mercury Magnetosphere Orbiter (r). (Credit: Space.com)

Surprisingly, BepiColombo is actually two spacecraft in one. Once in orbit around Mercury BepiColombo will split into two distinct probes. One is the Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO) and the other is the Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter (MMO). Both probes will conduct different observations of the planet. Like the Parker Solar Probe, BepiColombo promises to reward us with many new discoveries in the near future.

The planet Mercury is much closer to Earth than Jupiter but because it is so close to the Sun it is more difficult to get to, so we actually know less about it. BepiColombo will hopefully teach us a great deal more. (Credit: Phys.org)

Finally I have some sad news to report, the Ingenuity helicopter, which was carried to the planet Mars aboard the Perseverance rover and which became the first human built craft to fly on another planet, see my post of 1 May 2021, crashed on its 72nd flight. Now bear in mind that Ingenuity was really just a test vehicle, intended only to see if flight of any kind was even possible in Mar’s thin atmosphere. The original NASA plan was for Ingenuity to only take five flights, tests that would be observed by Perseverance. That the little helicopter would succeed in making 72 flights over a three-year period and cover over 16 kilometers was beyond the wildest hopes of the engineers at the Jet Propulsion Labouratory who designed and built the aircraft.

The Ingenuity helicopter on Mars was the first ever man made aircraft to take flight on another planet. Originally planned to take five experimental flights the little helicopter that could made rose above the Martian surface 72 times before finally crashing. (Credit: Popular Mechanics)

Now NASA has released a report detailing what they think happened to Ingenuity, although since the accident happened over 100 million kilometers from Earth no one can visit the crash site to do a proper investigation to be certain. The trouble seemed to begin on Ingenuity’s 70th flight when the helicopter was flying over an area of flat terrain with few features. Because the ground below had so few landmarks it caused Ingenuity’s visual navigation system to become confused. The same problem occurred on the next flight, in fact the navigation system ordered an emergency landing, one that turned out to be a hard landing, a landing that NASA thinks damaged at least one of the helicopter’s blades. Ingenuity’s 72nd and final flight was intended to be just a short test to see whether any damage had been sustained but the helicopter quickly crashed, breaking off both of its rotors about midway.

When a Lear Jet recently crashed in NE Philadelphia member of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) were quickly on site investigating what had happened. When Ingenuity crashed on Mars it obviously wasn’t possible for investigators to visit the site so the engineers at NASA had to figure out what happened based on the data the little aircraft had sent back to Earth. (Credit: YouTube)

Ingenuity may no longer be flying but the tiny probe is still working, acting now as a weather station on the Martial surface. And because Ingenuity was so successful NASA is now planning on a new helicopter to explore Mars. The proposed aircraft has been given the name Mars Chopper and it is a six-engine drone like helicopter that will be about the size of an SUV. Mars Chopper will carry an array of instruments to enable it to explore the Red Planet but whether it will operate in cooperation with a rover or autonomously is still to be decided.

Concept design for a possible Mars Chopper aircraft to continue Ingenuity’s mission of exploring of the red planet. (Credit: ScienceAlert)

In either case Mars Chopper will join the Parker Solar Probe and BepiColombo and all of the unmanned spacecraft that humans beings have sent into outer space to explore our solar system.

Archaeology News for February 2025:  Two Ancient Sites that tell us a great deal about how People lived Thousands of Years Ago.

Starting about ten thousand years ago we humans first began to both cultivate crops and domesticate herd animals. These twin achievements allowed our ancestors to end their nomadic, hunter-gatherer lifestyle and settle down into more permanent sites, villages, towns and eventually cities.

The Hunter-Gatherer lifestyle wasn’t quite as exciting, or as dangerous as this but life was hard for our ancestors more than 10,000 years ago. (Credit: Students of History)

This change from temporary housing in caves or portable huts to long-term structures obviously is a great boon to present day archaeologists. Think about it, a cave where an extended family lived for a few months out of the year certainly won’t contain as much archaeological evidence for an excavator to find as would a cluster of dwellings where many families lived for decades or longer. Nevertheless the details of exactly when and how that change from wanderers to homesteaders took place are still fuzzy, which is why a great deal of the efforts of archaeologists today are geared towards the study of how humans built those first urban areas.

The first villages appeared in Mesopotamia about 10,000 years ago and probably looked something like this. Mud brick homes of a single room each with the work of farming and domestic animals happening right where the people lived. (Credit: Q-files)

As I mentioned above one of the advancements that enabled the first villages and towns to be built was domesticating animals that could be herded like sheep or goats or even reindeer in the north. Now the raising and handling of such large groups of animals requires not only pastures for grazing but also corrals for confining them when it becomes time for sheering, branding, slaughtering or even just counting how many of them you have.

Today we still use corrals whenever we want to keep animals in one place. (Credit: Carri-Lite Corrals)

A recent study by archaeologists at Tel Aviv University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel has upended long held ideas about a late Stone-Age, early Bronz Age, 4-5 thousand year old mysterious site in the Golan Heights known as the ‘Gilgal Refaim’, which is Hebrew for the ‘Wheel of Giants’. For decades now the 100-meter in diameter site had been interpreted as an astronomical observatory like the famous Stonehenge in England. Indeed the site is often referred to as the ‘Wheel Stonehenge’.

The Wheel of Giants, Gilgal Refaim in Hebrew as it appears in the Golan Heights. Until recently it was thought that the neolithic people who built this site used it as a calendar but new studies have shown that 4-5,000 year ago the site had no alignment to the solstices or equinoxes. Instead it appears to have been used as a corral for rounding up domestic, or possibly wild animals. (Credit: Israel Bardugo Photography)

The new study however took into account the way that Plate Tectonics, working at a slow rate of 8-15 mm per year has over the last 4-5 thousand years moved and even rotated the wheel. So looking at the way that the wheel was orientated back in the Neolithic the archaeologists found that there were no alignments to any celestial objects or events like solstices or equinoxes that would be important to a newly agricultural society. Instead the researchers maintain that Gilgal Refaim was a corral, a place that shepherds or goatherds could bring their flocks. The researchers also surveyed the surrounding area within 30km of the site and found other, smaller examples of such stone wheels averaging 20m in diameter. So perhaps Gilgal Refaim is simply the largest of a whole class of structures in the area used to concentrate livestock. 

A 4,000 year old megalithic tomb not far from Gilgal Refaim. The Golan Heights is an area rich in neolithic sites which is a shame since it is also so militarily significant that it has been constantly fought over by Israel and Syria. (Credit: Ancient Origins)

At the same time the archaeologists also recognize that structures like corrals can often serve as locations where people gather and interact. Remember the first rodeos were just people having fun at corrals while working with their livestock. So there is every possibility that Gilgal Refaim could have been used as a gathering place for nearby clans, either for religious of social events.

If you think about it the first Rodeos were just people having fun while working with domestic animals at a corral! Certainly people back in the Neolithic did much the same. (Credit: Canadian Horse Journal)

Another way in which the lives of human beings changed as they began to live in settled communities is the spread of communicable diseases. Think about it, a small group of nomads, say 12-15 people, who wander from one place to another with the seasons as different resources become available will probably only encounter other such groups three, maybe four times a year. Those are hardly the conditions that would allow an infectious disease to spread rapidly.

We have ample evidence that hunter gatherer groups were quite small, rarely more than a dozen people in all and those groups came in contact with other such groups only occasionally. (Credit: Wikipedia)

When humans started living in larger communities of hundreds or thousands of people however infectious organisms could multiply more easily, allowing the evolution of more diseases that could inflict our species. Indeed there is considerable DNA evidence that illnesses like salmonella, tuberculosis and even the bubonic plague all began to infect humans during the Neolithic period, the time of the first villages.

Cities, with big crowds of people are the perfect environment for diseases to spread. (Credit: South China Morning Post)

Now there is also evidence that humans began to adapt to these new, potential epidemic conditions by adopting a policy of ‘social distancing’ familiar to all of us thanks to Covid-19. A team of researchers from the University of Tennessee, Cambridge University, Durham University and Texas A&M have studied the patterns of settlement during the Neolithic ‘Trypillia’ culture of eastern Ukraine. Their results have been published in the ‘Journal of the Royal Society Interface’. During the late Stone Age this area contained a number of proto-towns or even proto-cities that have been well studied by archaeologists.

The known distribution of Neolithic sites in Ukraine designated as ‘Trypillia’ by archaeologists. (Credit: Cambridge University Press)

The researchers focused on one settlement known today as Nebelivka, which possessed thousands of wooden dwellings that were identified as being arranged in concentric patterns and clustered in pie shaped neighborhoods. Using computer programs designed to both study the spread of diseases as well as model urban planning to minimize that spread the team discovered that the inhabitants of Nebelivka were well aware of the hygienic benefits of ‘social distancing’. “This clustered layout is known by epidemiologists to be a good configuration to contain disease outbreaks.” According to Lead Author Alex Bentley of the University of Tennessee. “This suggests and helps explain the curious layout of the world’s first urban areas. It would have protected residents from emerging diseases of the time.”

A reconstruction of a Trypillia megasite like Nebelivka. That’s a pretty fair sized town but notice how it’s also rather spread out with open spaces between clusters of homes. Was this in order to help reduce the spread of disease? (Credit: History Enhanced)

The team also conducted a more detailed simulation of what would occur in Nebelivka if a food borne illness such as salmonella was to break out there. Carrying out millions of computer simulations what they discovered was that the pie shaped clustering of houses in Nebelivka helped to reduce the spread of such diseases.

Even today the food borne illness Salmonella causes a huge number of people to get sick. Part of the reason for this is the concentration of people living in cities. (Credit: Harvard Health)

The study’s result may also help to explain why the residents of Nebelivka are known to have burned down their dwellings on a regular basis and replaced them with new wooden houses. Fire has long been used as a means of fighting infectious disease.

There is much evidence throughout Eastern Europe of Neolithic People burning their homes on a regular basis. Archaeologists aren’t certain but it seems likely they did this in order to prevent the spread of diseases. (Credit: Daybreaks Devotions)

What both of these two studies show is that the people of the Neolithic period were every bit as smart as we are. That they used what technology they had to solve the problems that they faced and occasionally they developed new technology that they passed on. We are the inheritors of their knowledge and wisdom, we should be a little more grateful.

Book Review: ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ by Tom McGrath. 

As the 1960s came to an end and the Vietnam War withered to its foregone conclusion the ‘Hippies’, those radicalized college students who protested everything and everyone now faced a terrible reality; they had to get jobs and earn a living. Unlike their parents, who had normally lived a quiet life working for a single company and bought a home in the suburbs, they wanted something more exciting. They wanted a fast paced career where they could be a big success, and they wanted to move back into the cities where there were more and different kinds of people and just more things to do.

Cover art for ‘Triumph of the Yuppies” along with a picture of author Tom McGrath. (Credit: Philadelphia Magazine)

These ‘Baby Boomers’ would, in the decade of the 1980s create a new demographic called the ‘Young Urban Professionals’ or ‘Yuppies’. The new book by author Tom McGrath, ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ details how during the 1980s this small percentage of the American population came to completely change our country, and not for the better. Now not every baby boomer became a yuppie, for the most part yuppies were the college educated boomers who used what they’d learned to transform the US economy from one based on manufacturing to one based on service and finance. As an example of how quickly this metamorphosis took place in 1960 there were only 4,500 Master’s degrees in Business Administration (MBAs) handed out by US colleges and Universities but by 1976 there were over fifty thousand every year and that number would continue to grow throughout the 1980s.

Remember in 1960 only 4500 MBA degrees were awarded by all the colleges in the US. How much damage has been caused by the enormous growth of professionals whose only training is in getting every penny of profit that they can! (Credit: eLerners.com)

In ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ author McGrath follows the lives of many of the participants in that transformation, people like Peter Ueberroth who organized the 1984 LA Olympics, Bruce Springsteen whose song ‘Born in the USA’ became an anthem for a generation or Marissa Piesman whose ‘the Yuppie Cookbook’ helped popularize the name. These are only a few of the dozens of people who are mentioned because of their influence on the decade.

The 1980s also saw tremendous growth in the Celebrity Industry, allowing ordinary people to follow the wonderful lives of people better than they were! (Credit: ebay)

Three individuals stand out however as examples of their time. Jerry Rubin the 60s radical who in the late 70s decided he wanted to be rich along with Michael Milken, the investment wizard who turned risky and low valued ‘Junk Bonds’ into a multi-billion dollar business. The third was Jack Welch, the CEO of General Electric (GE) who kept his stockholders happy by squeezing every penny he could out of two of the most famous companies in the US, and in the process destroyed one and while leaving the other a shell of its former self.

Once the most radical of Hippies starting in the late 70s Jerry Rubin became a high priest of the new religion ‘Money’! (Credit: The History Channel)

It was these individuals, along with thousands of others who actually accomplished the ‘Reagan Revolution’ a revolution whose real architect was the economist Milton Friedman. With the relaxation of regulations on banking and other financial industries the brand new MBAs began a series of ‘Leveraged Buy Outs’ and ‘Hostile Take Overs’ all of which made money for those in on the deal.

Michael Milken, on the other hand, was always devoted to the god Mammon! (Credit: Investopedia)

Meanwhile, those who weren’t MBAs or Yuppies of one variety or another saw jobs being sent overseas to counties with lower wage workers. McGrath even quotes Walter Mondale’s acceptance speech in the 1984 Democratic Convention “To those companies that send our jobs overseas, my message is: We need those jobs here at home.” So all the while that the dealmakers were lining their pockets the gap between rich and poor continued to grow.

In 1984 Walter Mondale (r) got clobbered by Ronald Reagan (l). But everything that Mondale warned us about has pretty much come true. We haven’t done much better ever since! (Credit: YouTube)

In their rush to make money as quickly as possible to keep shareholders happy the management at American companies cut back on long term investments in order to turn short term profits. One case in point is particularly tragic, RCA the leading US electronics manufacturer made the deliberate decision not to invest $200 million dollars in the technology and assembly lines necessary to build the new Video Cassette Recorders that everybody wanted. Instead RCA spent $1.2 billion buying a small financial bank so that management could show an immediate profit. That’s why today Sony and Sanyo and Panasonic own the household electronics industry while RCA no longer exists.

The Radio Corporation of America (RCA) was once a leader in technology and industry. today it no longer exists. It is a victim of the ‘profit today instead of investing in tomorrow’ strategy. (Credit: Reason Magazine)

In ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ author McGrath tells a hundred such stories, he relates the details of deals and mergers that, in hindsight, have led to many of the problems our country faces today. At the same time McGrath also reminds us of the culture of the 80s, the decade of excess. The fictional TV shows ‘Dallas’ and ‘Dynasty’ are mentioned along with the early reality shows like ‘Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous’. Other aspects of yuppie life are mentioned as well such as the exercise craze that Jane Fonda made a bundle on and gourmet food. In all ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ does a great job of bringing the 80s back to life.

The 80s were a time of excess in all things, even exercise. Jane Fonda went from opposing Vietnam to helping everyone stay trim and fit, and made a bundle doing so! (Credit: Amazon)

And that’s the problem with ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ it’s all tales with no context, no analysis. McGrath never manages to describe how the counter-culture of the 60s grew into the excesses of the 80s, and he never discusses what do we do now to try to fix our economy, our political system, our country. So while ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ does detail where our country went wrong there are no solutions, no mention of a way forward.

Income inequality is a growing problem in our country today. Can we solve it, and can we solve our environmental problems without solving it? (Credit: Othering and Belonging Institute)

Nevertheless, I do give ‘Triumph of the Yuppies’ a thump’s up because it is really entertaining. Time and time again you will find yourself smiling at the antics of the selfish, looking out for number one bastards who truly believed that ‘Greed is Good!’

Are Nuclear Chemists on the verge of Manufacturing a new Element for the first time in 23 years? 

We all remember the Periodic Table of the Elements from our High School Science classes. You’ll remember that one of the things we were taught was that Uranium, element number 92, was the heaviest element that occurred naturally, all of the higher number elements had been manufactured in a labouratory using an ‘Atom Smasher’ or similar technology. The atomic number you’ll recall is simply the number of positively charged protons in the nucleus of any atom.

Of course, you all remember the Periodic Table of the Elements. You may not believe it but this table really does pack a huge amount of information about the chemical elements in a convenient form! (Credit: PubChem)

The first artificial element was manufactured in 1940 and was actually number 94 Plutonium, which was created by forcing alpha particles into a nucleus of Uranium. You may remember that alpha particles are actually the nucleus of Helium, element number 2, so adding element 2 to element 92 gets you element 94. In the years shortly after World War 2 many new elements were created by physicists. Starting in the 1960s however the pace began to slow as it became more and more difficult to produce heavier elements.

Ernest Lawrence (r) with M.S. Livingston next to the first ‘Atom Smasher’ at the University of California at Berkeley. Particle accelerators like this have been instrumental in the creation of all of the artificial elements beyond Uranium. (Credit: American Physical Society)

The reason for why making heavier elements became more difficult is actually the same as the reason why there are no naturally occurring elements beyond Uranium, radioactivity. In fact every element beyond Bismuth, element 83 is radioactive and will eventually decay into some lighter element. What’s actually going on is that the positively charged protons repel each other, in electricity it’s opposites charges that attract while similar charges repel after all. When you get more than about 80 protons in a nucleus even the nuclear glue, the so-called ‘Strong Force’ has trouble keeping the nucleus together.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is unnamed.gif
When the nucleus of an atom becomes ‘too big’ meaning that it has too many protons the electric repulsive force trying to push the nucleus apart becomes stronger than the nuclear force keeping it together. The atom will eventually decay by either emitting an alpha particle (upper right) or a beta particle (upper left) or a gamma ray (lower left). (Credit: HyperPhysics Concepts)

Take Uranium with 92 protons for example, it has what’s called a half-life of about 4.5 billion years. What that means is, if you had 100 atoms of Uranium and waited 4.5 billion years half of those atoms would have decayed into some lighter element, only 50 would be left as Uranium. It’s a curious fact that since our Earth is also about 4.5 billion years old that means that today our planet only has half of the Uranium it originally had.

Uranium ore (l) and purified Uranium (r). (Credit: Britanica and Smithsonian Magazine)

 Many other elements have shorter half-lives than Uranium, Radium for example has a half life of only 1620 years making it very radioactive and therefore very dangerous. Plutonium, the first artificial element has a half life of about 80 million years, which still makes it kinda dangerous.

When first discovered Radium was thought to be a miracle element. The fact that it glowed continuously all be itself should have told someone that any chemical that energetic was dangerous, but it wasn’t until many people got radiation poisoning that scientists realized how deadly it was. (Credit: Scientific Scarsdalian)

Anyway, the elements beyond Plutonium have very short half-lives, hours, minutes, even seconds and by the time you get to the heaviest element so far, Oganesson at number 118 it has a half life of only milliseconds. Indeed, Oganesson’s half life is so short that it was probably created a couple of years before its existence could be verified. The atoms just didn’t last long enough for the chemical checks to be completed that would make certain that it had been created.

The heaviest element manufactured so far is Oganesson, number 118. Notice how the element’s appearance is predicted. Not enough of Oganesson has been made so far for anyone to be able to see it! (Credit: Science Notes and Projects)

The rules of Quantum Mechanics are strange and arcane however and the theoretical physicists who try to understand the nucleus have for several decades now been predicting that an ‘island of stability’ should exist from about element 120 to 126. Elements in this span are calculated to last for minutes if not hours or perhaps even longer, if only we could get there.

According to the complex mathematics of Quantum Mechanics the Protons and Neutrons in the nucleus arrange themselves in shells. A shell that is filled is more stable than an unfilled shell making some nuclei longer lasting than others. It is predicted that elements 120-126 will be more stable so nuclear chemists are trying to produce those elements. (Credit: Open MedScience)

Now experimentalists at Lawrence Berkeley National Labouratory may have found the right technique. What they have succeeded in doing is to develop a beam of titanium nuclei, atoms of element 22 that have been completely stripped of their electrons. Using them to bombard atoms of Plutonium, element 94 the scientists have succeeded in producing the superheavy element Livermorium, number 116. The key factor here is that a pure beam of titanium nuclei something never before achieved with an element so high on the periodic table.

A step by step outline of the experiment performed at Lawrence Berkeley that used titanium nuclei to produce Livermorium, element 116. Titanium is the heaviest nuclei to be used as a projectile in an ‘Atom Smasher’ so this experiment is a big step forward. (Credit: Gizmodo)

What the researchers at Lawrence Berkeley Labouratory plan to do now is to replace the Plutonium target with the element Californium, number 98 in order to produce element 120 and thereby reach the shore of that elusive island of stability. They expect that effort to take several years, Californium is both hard to get and hard to work with, but these scientists are the best in the world at handling superheavy elements.

The team at Lawrence Berkeley working to produce the heaviest element ever standing in front of some of their equipment. (Credit:

Everything in our world, including our own bodies is made of such atoms and nuclei, by creating these new elements physicists learn more about both the particles making up the nucleus and the forces that keep it together, or force it apart.

Two Stories from Nature that Illustrate just how similar the Behavior of Animals is to our Own. 

There was a time when it all seemed so simple, the behavior of we humans was based on reason and moral judgment while that of the animals was purely based on instinct, a rather egotistic point of view to be sure. In fact, ever since we humans began to actually look at the way animals do behave, we’ve been surprised at how often animal behavior resembles our own.

Like ourselves Chimpanzees are now known to use a variety of tools for different jobs. (Credit: AnimalWise)

Many animals use tools! Many communicate with each other using a variety of methods! Teamwork among animals is more extensive and complex than we ever imagined! Animals also engage in bad behavior, like stealing from each other, committing murder, even going to war! In many ways the behavior of animals differs in degree, not in kind from human behavior.

And again like ourselves Chimpanzees are now known to make war one group against another! (Credit: Shutterstock)

Take intoxication for example, surely the drinking of alcoholic beverages is an activity that didn’t exist until we humans began fermenting grapes or grains or, let’s face it we’ll ferment any food with enough sugar in it. Well actually no, fermentation is a very natural process, a process that just happens to overripe fruits and grains as the yeast on their skins begins to convert sugar to alcohol.

The classical Greeks and Romans so loved wine that they created the god Bacchus to honour it. (Credit: Crystalinks)

And there have been numerous observations by naturalists of fruit eating animals in the wild eating overripe fruit and then acting inebriated. In fact many overripe fruits can have an alcohol content of 1-2% by volume and some, like the palm fruit in Panama, have been found to have an alcohol content as high as 10%. Also most fruit eating animals, like monkeys and bats are rather small so it takes less alcohol to get a spider monkey drunk than an adult human.

The Palm fruit of Central and South America is well known for undergoing the process of fermentation when it becomes over ripe, a naturally occurring form of alcohol. (Credit: Specialty Produce)

Still most naturalists assumed that drunkenness in animals was just an accident, not an actual behavior. That assumption is now being challenged by a new paper in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution.  While the paper accepts that drunkenness has its downside, it is certainly more difficult to avoid a predator’s attack if you are inebriated than if you are sober, there are still a lot of benefits to consuming alcoholic fruit.

Central American spider monkeys have now been observed to actually seek out over ripe fruit in order to get drunk! (Credit: Daily Mail)

For one thing it is packed with calories, the thing all living creatures need most, and the strong smell of alcohol may serve to lead the animals to the fruit. Alcohol can also have medicinal benefits, it kills many viruses and bacteria, that’s why we use alcohol wipes to disinfect. Finally the paper speculates that, as with we humans, the more social of fruit eating animals may actually use over ripe fruit, and its alcohol as a relaxant, an aid in socializing.

We humans use alcohol as a disinfectant, could some animals be doing the same thing? That would imply a considerable amount of intelligence on their part! (Credit: www.lazada.com.ph)

The paper concludes by stating that more research is needed before anything definite can be said. Alcohol occurs naturally in many ecosystems and if evolution has taught us anything it is that living creatures will find some way to make use of any resource.

Naturally occurring yeast on grapes just starts the process of fermentation. It doesn’t need any human effort to make alcohol. (Credit: Enobytes)

Another way that we humans thought that we were unique was in our ability to organize and coordinate really large scale hunting efforts. O’k there are wolf packs and lion prides but organizing really big kills, like the cattle drives of the old wild west or even just the harvesting of tuna or some other schooling fish, well that takes human ingenuity and cooperation.

Native American were known to drive large herds of Buffalo over cliffs as one method of hunting them. Surely only we humans are capable of such planning and organization. (Credit: Buffalo Bill Center of the West)

Or maybe not, in a recently observed episode off the coast of Norway researchers using the latest acoustic surveying techniques watched in awe as the largest predation event ever recorded took place. It began as a huge swarm of capelin; an anchovy sized fish that lives in cold artic waters, migrated southward to the Norwegian coast in order to lay their eggs. The oceanographers who witnessed the event estimated from the size of the swarm and its density that there were more than 20 million fish gathered in a school spread over tens of kilometers in area, that number is still only a small fraction of all the capelin in the Artic. Heading south the capelin ran straight into a large school of their most dangerous predator, cod.

During their mating season millions of Capelin, a small fish related to the anchovy, swim to the coast of Norway in order to breed. Such a huge amount of food naturally attracts many different types of predators. (Credit: Interesting Engineering)

Over the course of just a few hours of continuous feeding the cod consumed more than half of the capelin, over 10 million individual fish, making this the largest predation incident ever studied. It’s worth remembering however, that this slaughter was only completely observed because of the new technology and the resources necessary to cover the entire occurrence, so it probably won’t be long before even bigger battles are observed.

While the Capelin are eaten by cod the cod are then eaten by larger fish, or we humans! That’s the food chain. (Credit: Yale E360)
Some of data collected by the naturalists who observed the immense predation event. You can almost see the cod attacked and devouring their prey. (Credit: MIT News)

Just a few more of the ways that other the behavior of other creatures resembles actions that we thought were unique of our species.

Space News for January 2025. 

My last few posts about the latest news on the human exploration of space was all about the technical problems associated with Boeing’s Starliner capsule and the effects those issues had on the Space X Crew 9 mission as well as the International Space Station (ISS) in general. So, in this post I intend to ignore both the ISS and all missions to Low Earth Orbit (LOE). Instead, I’ll be talking about NASA’s plans for going back to the Moon and, unfortunately politics.

Putting American boots back on the Moon is the goal of NASA’s Artemis Program! (Credit: Max Polyakov)

As I’ve discussed in several of my past posts, see 3 December 2022 and 24 February 2024, NASA’s plan for returning astronauts to the Moon is called the Artemis Program and resembles the old Apollo Program in several ways. Like the old giant Saturn V rocket NASA will use the large Space Launch System (SLS) to launch the Artemis astronauts into space aboard a capsule called Orion that is similar to the old Apollo Command Module. The Orion capsule is also attached to a Service Module, again like Apollo. The actual landing on the Moon will be accomplished using a Landing Module, again like Apollo.

Space X is one of two companies that have been contracted to design and build the actual landing module for the Artemis program. They plan on using a modified version of their Starship lunch vehicle. (Credit: Spacenews)

The biggest difference between Artemis and Apollo is that for Artemis the Lander Module will not travel to the Moon with the Orion capsule and its Service Module but rather will go to the Moon by itself. NASA also hopes at some point to place a small space station into Lunar orbit from which the Astronauts will descend to the Lunar surface.

NASA’s plan for a space station in orbit around the Moon has been designated as the ‘Lunar Gateway’. (Credit: NASA)

NASA has already carried out one unmanned test mission of the SLS and Orion capsule back in December of 2022, a flight that was called the Artemis 1 mission, which was the first time that a man capable spacecraft had orbited the Moon since 1972. As the Orion capsule was returning to Earth however its heat shield underwent unexpected charring during re-entry and despite two years of testing NASA still does not fully understand the problem.

Launch of the Artemis 1 unmanned test of the hardware that will take humans back to the Moon. At first the mission seemed to be a complete success, but later examination of the returned command module shows signs of heat damage that concerned the engineers at NASA. (Credit: Wired)

Because of that issue NASA has decided to once again delay the Artemis 2 mission, which will take human beings back to Lunar orbit for the first time since the days of Apollo. That mission was scheduled to launch in September of 2025 but according to a press release from the space agency the Artemis 2 mission will now take place no earlier than April of 2026. That delay will in turn further push back the Artemis 3 mission that is intended to finally return astronauts to the Moon’s surface until mid 2027 at the earliest.

To a certain degree the Artemis 2 mission will be a repeat of the Apollo 8 mission that orbited but did not land on the Moon. Nevertheless it will represent the first time that astronauts have gone back to the Moon in over 50 years. (Credit: Wikipedia)

There is one small plus to the delays in the Artemis 2 and 3 launch dates and that is it will give more time to Space X and Blue Origin to develop and test their Lunar landing modules. Both companies are contracted to build the vehicles that will take astronauts from Lunar orbit to the Moon’s surface and both are deep in the development stages for their respective landers.

Blue Origin is the other company contracted to build a lunar lander. This is their design. (Credit: Spacenews)

In fact NASA has just released contracts to both companies to develop unmanned cargo version of their landers. The development of cargo versions of the landers will allow NASA to place equipment on the Lunar surface before the astronauts arrive and to resupply the astronauts while there are on the Moon’s surface. One of the pieces of equipment that NASA is anxious to have on the Moon is a new pressurized rover vehicle being developed by the Japanese space agency JAXA and which is scheduled to be ready for the Artemis 7 mission in 2032. The long term establishment of a permanent base on the Moon will certainly require such cargo landers to deliver equipment and supplies.

Artist’s concept of what a lunar base could look like in about 20-30 years. (Credit: YouTube)

Obviously making such long term plans and seeing them through to the end requires steady and constant funding and that requires a stable political situation. It’s with more than a bit of trepidation therefore that I tell you that President elect Trump has nominated Jared Isaacman to be the new Administrator of NASA, replacing the current NASA chief Bill Nelson.

With the incoming Trump administration NASA will have a new administrator replacing Bill Nelson (r) with Jared Isaacman (l). (Credit: NASA)

On the surface Isaacman seems like a good choice, the billionaire founder of Shift4 payments corporation has actually been into space twice, each time funding private space missions through Space X, which just happens to be owned by Isaacman’s good friend Elon Musk. See my posts of 17 March 2021 and 2 October 2021. Isaacman is an avid supporter of space exploration who is firmly committed to America’s having a leading place in that endeavour. It is quite possible that Isaacman may succeed in doing what’s necessary to get the Artemis program back on track and return America to the Moon.

In Jared Isaacman NASA will, for the first time have an administrator who has actually been in space! (Credit: NDTV)

It’s also quite possible that Isaacman and his buddy Musk will look at all of the delays and cost overruns in the Artemis program and decide to just cancel it all? Will he and Musk convince Trump to just let Space X take over the whole task of space exploration? Maybe skipping the Moon entirely to go to Mars, which is what Musk has always wanted!

Elon Musk has always wanted to go to Mars, not back to the Moon. Could he and his buddy Isaacman cancel the Artemis program entirely and set NASA on a new course? (Credit: Medium)

NASA has been jerked around like this countless times since Apollo. Reagan wanted to build a Space Station, but then George H.W. Bush decided to go to Mars. Clinton went back to Reagan’s plans and actually got a station built but then George W. Bush wanted to go back to the Moon again and it’s taken us 20 years to get at least some of the equipment ready.

In his State of the Union Address in 1984 Ronald Reagan directed NASA to build a space station within 10 years. It took a bit longer and we had to get the Russians to help! (Credit: NASA)

So, will all of the time and billions already spent on Artemis simply be tossed aside for some new vision of these two tech billionaires? And if the Trump administration does give NASA an entirely different goal, a goal that will certainly take years to complete, what if the next administration changes it once again? And all the while China, which doesn’t have to worry about new administrations changing course every four years, just keeps plugging away with its goal of landing Chinese taikonauts on the Moon by 2030!

Book Review: ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ by J. N. G. Ritchie. 

‘The Brochs of Scotland’ is a bit of an unusual book for me to review; the book is a type of publication that is known as a monograph, that is, a book or pamphlet on a single scholarly topic.  Monographs are usually small, ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ is only 56 pages total, and tend to be a bit technical. Because of their narrow focus of interest typically only a few thousand copies of a monograph are printed, often by a publishing house that specializes in such small, scholarly works. ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ is in fact printed by Shire Publishing, a division of Bloomsbury Publishing that is devoted to such books.

Cover of ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ by J. N. G. Ritchie. The book is available at Amazon. (Credit: Amazon.com)

In the history of science a few monographs have gone on to become famous, the best example would probably be Galileo’s ‘The Starry Messenger’. Most monographs however remain virtually unknown to everyone but a specialist in the field or a devoted amateur.

Cover page of Galileo’s ‘The Starry Messenger’ sometimes considered to be a founding document of modern science and certainly one of the most important publications in history! (Credit: Wikipedia)

As I was reading ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ I happened to notice that I have quite a few monographs, a few examples are ‘Stonehenge and Avebury’, ‘Seeing Stars’, and ‘A List of Devonian Fossils collected in Western New York with notes on their Stratigraphic Distribution’. I decided to review ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ not only because it would give me a opportunity to discuss these unusual Iron Age structures that are unique to Scotland but because it would also give me the chance to talk about monographs.

Mousa Broch is one of the best preserved Brochs giving a real impression of just how impressive the structures could be. (Credit: Wikipedia)

Brochs are a distinctive form of stone tower or fortress that were built by the hundreds between approximately the years 100 BCE and 100 CE. Brochs are unknown outside of modern Scotland and most are concentrated in the northern and western parts of the country, only a few Brochs can be found in the middle and southern parts of the country. The majority of Brochs are now ruins but a few are complete enough to show what impressive structures they were in their heyday.

Artist’s impression of what archaeologists think the interior of a Broch could have looked like. Obviously such large-scale structures required the efforts of many people to build and were probably the dwelling of the local chief or clan leader. (Credit: The Isle of Mull)

As I said Brochs are stone towers with a central open area round 10 meters in diameter where the inhabitants lived. This area was surrounded by a massive circular wall between 4 and 5 meters in thickness and as much as 10 meters in height. Those thick walls are perhaps the most striking feature of the Brochs because they are really a double wall with a space in between that averages around a meter wide inside them. Often the space between the walls was used as a room or storage area. At the same time stairways to the top of the Brochs were also built into the walls.

This image of the Dun Telve broch clearly shows the double wall construction technique. Storage areas and stairs to the upper floors were built into the walls of brochs. (Credit: MyHighlands.de)

Each Broch had only a single entrance from the outside to the central area, often with one of the rooms attached to the entrance, perhaps as a guard post? In any case the entrances were well protected, attachments for bolting heavy wooden doors can still be seen in the better preserved Brochs.

The area around a broch was also built up with houses and barns or other structures. The whole area was surrounded by a wall creating something of a small town, a well defended one! (Credit: Caithness Broch Project)

The whole design of the Brochs indicates that they were built for defense, the Iron Age equivalent of castles for local chiefs. However only a very few of the remaining Brochs show any sign of ever having been attacked, the author Ritchie suggested that they may have been built so well that it was a waste of time and effort to even consider attacking one.

The Castles of their day Brochs appear to have been so successful that archaeologists have found little evidence of any of them ever being attacked! (Credit: BBC)

If that was so then why did the 2nd century inhabitants of Scotland stop building them, why over the next few hundred years were the Brochs abandoned? In ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ the author considers both this question and the also unknown origins of the Broch style of architecture. The monograph also considers the questions of what it was like to live in Scotland at the time of the Brochs along with brief descriptions of some of the better known, better preserved Brochs along with some of the artifacts that have been found among them.

Some of the tools, jewelry and weapons made in Scotland during the age of the Brochs. There must have been something of an advanced civilization there at that time to have made both these artifacts and the Brochs as well! (Credit: Phys.org)

Now I don’t suppose that anyone out there is going to rush to buy a copy of  ‘The Brochs of Scotland’ unless you’re as interested in the archaeology of the British Isles as I am. It is actually available from Amazon if you are. Still, I do recommend ‘The Brochs of Scotland’; it is a wonderful overview of these ancient, formidable yet kinda weird habitations.

The people that the Greeks called Celts are still mostly a mystery. Although archaeologists have learned a great deal about them there is still a lot to be learned. (Credit: World History Encyclopedia)

And I also recommend monographs in general. They are wonderful little books, containing a great deal of information on very select subjects. So, if you have an interest in Hindu temples, or the birds of Chile, or the paintings of Rembrandt check to see if there are any available monographs on the subject. I’m sure someone has written one sometime or another!

Astronomy News for October 2024: Learning more about Three Well Known Stars. 

We live in a galaxy that contains an estimated 200 billion stars, yes that’s billion with a ‘b’, and our galaxy is only one in a Universe of tens of billions, more likely hundreds of billions of galaxies. So there are a lot of stars out there yet only a few are known to the average person. In this post I’ll be talking about some of the latest discoveries about three of the best known stars starting with the most important star of them all, at least to us, our own Sun.

Have you ever visited the site spaceweather.com. It’s a great place for all sorts of information about our Sun and the way it affects us here on Earth. (Credit: Spaceweather.com)

Even after 400 years of intense study our Sun still holds many mysteries. One of the biggest is the fact that the Sun’s atmosphere, the corona, the part we can only see during a total eclipse, is much, much hotter than the Sun’s surface, which we call the photosphere. Now we know that the Sun’s source of energy is the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium that takes place in the star’s core, at the very center, which is at a temperature of about 15 million degrees Kelvin. As that energy flows outward the temperature decreases until at the photosphere it’s only 5800 degrees Kelvin. However beyond the photosphere, in the corona the temperature suddenly goes back up to a million degrees Kelvin. The mystery is what is causing the corona to have such a high temperature.

The surface of the Sun that we see is the Photosphere at a temperature of about 6,000 degrees Kelvin. For some reason however the Sun’s Corona, which we can only see during an eclipse, is much hotter at over a million degrees Kelvin. (Credit: Sites.UAlberta.ca)

Prior research had also discovered a similar phenomenon. The solar wind, the charged particles that flow out from the Sun and which cause the Aurora if they strike the Earth, are actually moving rather slowly when they are close to the Sun but accelerate as they move further away. The question once again is, where is the energy coming from to cause that acceleration?

The Sun is so energetic that it is constantly ejecting material from its surface, material that we call the solar wind. That material flows outward striking the planets like Earth and eventually reaching interstellar space. (Credit: Space.com)

Now both the particles in the corona and those in the solar wind are charged subatomic particles, electrons and protons, a state of matter that is known as plasma, and unlike neutral atoms they are greatly effected by electromagnetic forces. Therefore astrophysicists have long theorized that it was the Sun’s magnetic field that was supplying the energy via a type of electromagnetic wave called Alfvén waves. The precise details of how the process worked however were difficult to work out without measurements from within the corona itself. In fact two sets of measurements would be required at the same time, one from close to the Sun and the other from a considerable distance further away in order to see if the magnetic field dropped in strength as the solar wind increased in velocity.

Alfven waves are generated by the interplay of an external magnetic field and the bulk movement of a fluid plasma. It’s strongest, and simplest to calculate when the field and plasma are at 90 degrees to each other and can get quite complicated in other situations. (Credit: SpringerLink)

Recently two separate space probes, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe, the closest man-made object to the Sun ever, and the European Space Agency’s Solar Orbiter were in just the right position to take those measurements. Parker was orbiting the Sun at a distance of just about nine million kilometers, again that’s the closest any man-made object has come to the Sun, and was making a series of measurements that included both the density and velocity of the particles in the solar wind as well as the strength of the Sun’s Magnetic field along with the fluctuations caused by the passage of the Alfvén waves.

The Parker Solar Probe has come closer to the Sun than any man-made object ever teaching us things about the Sun we never imagined. (Credit: European Space Agency)

Two days later the same section of the solar wind that Parker had measured flowed past Solar Orbiter and it took the same set of measurements. Upon examination what the two sets of data showed was that the strength of the magnetic field had dropped to almost nothing while the speed and hence temperature of the solar wind particles had increased. Precise calculations showed that the transfer of energy was balanced; the magnetic field had lost exactly the same energy that the solar wind had picked up. Like zillions upon zillions of tiny surf boards the protons and electrons had ridden the crests of the Alfvén waves and gained energy in the process.

The European Space Agency also has a solar probe, its Solar Orbiter which monitors the solar wind. (Credit: European Space Agency)

Whether or not other stars also have magnetic fields that produce Alfvén waves that drive their solar wind is unknown at present but little by little we are learning more about them. One of the best known stars, if only because of that movie, is Betelgeuse, a gas giant star that resides in the constellation Orion. Betelgeuse is also somewhat famous because astronomers think that sometime in the next million years or so it will explode as a supernova, shining so brightly that it will be visible during the daytime.

In the constellation Orion Betelgeuse is Orion’s right shoulder. One of the brightest stars in the night sky Betelgeuse is a red giant larger than the orbit of Jupiter around our sun. Astronomers think that Betelgeuse will likely become a supernova sometime in the next million years or so! (Credit: Live Science)

In fact just about five years ago Betelgeuse suddenly dropped significantly in brightness and rumours began on the internet that was star was getting ready to explode. Astronomers themselves were more cautious however; Betelgeuse’s brightness was always known to vary, although this degree of dimming was unusual. Over last few years Betelgeuse’s brightness has fluctuated and astronomers have concluded that a large dust cloud near Betelgeuse is occasionally covering much of the star’s disk causing the dimming event.

Betelgeuse’s brightest has always been known to vary quite a bit but in the last few years that fluctuation has increased leading to speculation that the star might explode soon! (Credit: Physics World)

Now a new paper by lead author astrophysicist Jared Goldberg at Flatiron University in New York City has proposed an alternate solution, Betelgeuse has a companion star just a bit more massive than our own Sun. Based upon measurements made of the star’s brightness over the last century astronomers had found that Betelgeuse had not only a fundamental period of oscillation of 416 days that was caused by an expansion and contraction of the star’s radius but an additional long secondary period of about 2170 days.

Is the recently observed variation in Betelgeuse’s brightest caused by a nearby companion star about the mass of our Sun? (Credit: Simons Foundation)

Dr. Goldberg asserts that this secondary period is caused by the orbit of a companion star 1.17±0.7 the mass of our Sun. This companion star orbits around the more massive Betelgeuse at a distance that is about 2.4 times Betelgeuse’s radius. Betelgeuse is so huge that if placed where our Sun was it would swallow all of the inner planets out to and including Jupiter. It is when this companion star is behind Betelgeuse that we see a dimming of the brightness of the two stars.

When two stars orbit each other if one goes behind the other from our viewpoint here on Earth what we see is a dip in the total brightness of the two stars. (Credit: YouTube)

Dr. Goldberg and his team may be right, and if they are then we may be wrong about our estimate as to how long before Betelgeuse goes nova, the star may have quite a few million years left to it. On the other hand if the dimming we have observed recently is caused by disturbances in the star’s outer atmosphere then time may indeed be running out for Betelgeuse.

When a star explodes as a supernova its brightest can exceed that of an entire galaxy, for a couple of weeks. (Credit: AAS Nova)

Another very familiar star is the North Star or Pole Star Polaris. As I mentioned in my post of 19August 2024 Polaris is a member of a class of stars known as Cepheids whose rhythmic oscillation in brightness allows astronomers to use them as distance markers. Polaris in particular brightens and dims ever four days.

To find the North Star Polaris first find the big dipper. The two front stars of the dipper point toward the North Star. (Credit: BBC Science Focus)

Polaris has made a bit of news lately because for the first time astronomers have succeeded in producing a rough image of the star’s disk. Now this is really a big deal, even in some of the biggest telescopes the very closest stars are still nothing but a point of light. The technology to resolve, as astronomers put it, another star’s disk has only been developed over the last twenty or so years and still requires a lot more work than just taking a picture. In fact astronomers had to combine the light gathered by six telescopes into a single instrument in order to resolve Polaris’ disk.

Just a few short years ago getting an image of the surface of any star but our Sun was impossible but with new technology astronomers can now see the surface of other suns! (Credit: Reddit)

And the astronomers who took Polaris’ picture were actually trying to confirm the existence, and learn more about a suspected second companion star to Polaris. The North Star was already known to have a companion star at a large distance from the main star but it was in 2005 that the Hubble Space Telescope discovered that Polaris also had a second much closer and smaller star orbiting it as well. In order to learn more about this second, much closer companion astronomers needed the greater resolution that could only be obtained by combining the light of several telescopes, a technique known as Interferometry. This technique also allowed the team to produce the image of Polaris’ disk, which shows large spots or blotches on the star’s surface, perhaps something akin to the sunspots on our Sun? Anyway, it’s nice to know that even as astronomers push ever farther into the depths of the Universe they are still learning more about some of the stars we humans have gazed at for thousands of years. 

COP 29, the Annual World Conference on Climate Change, got off to a terrible start but a deal was finally reached, assuming that is all the Countries involved keep it! 

Every year delegates from nations across the globe gather for the United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties, this year’s meeting was the 29th such meeting or COP29. This year’s conference was held at the city of Baku in Azerbaijan from November the 11th through the 22nd.

Azerbaijan went out of its way to make the COP29 conference look inviting. Too bad the results didn’t match the venue! (Credit: African Arguments)

Even before it started COP29 was in trouble. For one thing the choice of host nation was problematic because Azerbaijan is an oil rich nation whose economy is heavily dependent on exporting the source of the greenhouse gases that are causing global warming. This fact was made clear when the environmental group Global Witness succeeded in posing as oil company executives and actually filmed the conference’s CEO, Elnur Soltanov, who is also Azerbaijan’s deputy energy minister, trying to make a deal to sell his country’s oil. As a part of the conversation Minister Soltanov is heard to give his opinion that fossil fuels may be with us ‘perhaps forever’ along with describing natural gas as a ‘transitional fuel’.

As Azerbaijan’s Energy Minister Elnur Soltanov was the logical choice to head the COP29 conference. It just would have been nice if he’d had any idea about what the conference was trying to achieve. (Credit: Globsec Forum 2024)

It got worse, again before the conference had even started news stories were published announcing that the host country Azerbaijan had granted access to the conference to over 1,700 lobbyists from coal, oil and gas companies. These lobbyists, whose sole objective was to prevent the conference from actually doing anything to stop climate change, in fact outnumbered the delegates. Exxon-Mobile, Shell, BP, Chevron and all the private energy companies sent their lobbyists, as did the national oil companies like AramCo.

Is AramCo the world’s richest corporation or is it a part of the Saudi Arabian government? The answer is yes to both questions! (Credit: The Cradle)

To add to the outrage the Azerbaijan security people began detaining and in some cases arresting members of environmental and human rights groups who are also trying to lobby the delegates to try to save the planet. Of course Azerbaijan has never been an open society where the right to protest is legally guaranteed.

The environmentalists trying to save the planet were kept out of the actual COP29 conference while the lobbyists for the fossil fuel industries were allowed in. You think maybe that’s why nothing was actually accomplished? (Credit: Climate Home News)

How countries like Azerbaijan, and last year’s host Dubai, are chosen as hosts is mind numbing, and indicates a lack of seriousness on the part of the international community. In fact there has been severe criticism of the whole COP climate change process with CO2 emissions continuing to increase even as the world’s temperature rises above the 1.5ºC increase that nations pledged to prevent just nine years ago. 

Just nine years ago everybody seemed so happy as the world agreed to limit Global Warming to less than 1.5 degrees. Nobody’s smiling now! (Credit: Canvi Climatic)

Another factor that lowered expectations was the fact that very few heads of state even bothered to attend COP29. President Biden, China’s President Xi and India’s PM Modi headed a long list of world leaders whose absence clearly indicated how little they cared about the planet. The new British PM Keir Starmer did attend, highlighting his government’s determination to flight global warming but he had little support among the rest of the developed countries.

Of all of the world’s leading economies, who of course are the world’s leading polluters as well, only Keir Starmer of the UK even bothered to show up at COP29! (Credit: Reuters)

And as the icing on the cake just the week before COP 29 began the world’s most vocal climate denier Donald Trump was elected as the next President of the United States. With another Trump administration coming every delegate at the Conference knew that no matter what agreement they succeeded in reaching it would probably be immediately torn up when Trump takes office on January 20th.

As far as Trump is concerned saving the planet just costs too much! With that kind of brilliant thinking in charge we’re in deep trouble! (Credit: Instagram)

Even as the conference was proceeding the growing dangers of climate change was highlighted by a new study from the non-profit research organization Climate Central that analyzed the effect of this year’s highest ever recorded temperatures on the not quite over Atlantic hurricane season. According to the analysis all eleven Atlantic hurricanes saw their maximum wind speeds increased by 14-45 kph due to global warming.

The phenomenon of ‘Rapid Intensification’ had never been observed before 1980, it’s now happening to about half of all hurricanes. (Credit: Climate Central)

For seven of those hurricanes that increase in wind speed caused them to jump up one category on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale. Since it has been known for many years that a hurricane’s destructive power very nearly doubles for every increase of one on the Saffir-Simpson scale the paper estimates that of the economic damage caused by hurricanes Helene and Milton approximately 45% was due to global warming. 

Even as the number of billion dollar disasters grows people still ignore the consequences of human induced climate change! (Credit: North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies)

With all of that controversy before the conference began it was hardly surprising that throughout the conference COP29 seemed on the verge of collapse. The nation of India, currently the world’s third largest polluter, in particular made it clear that it had no intention of halting or even slowing its economic growth, which is heavily dependent on increased fossil fuel use. At the same time India continued its criticism of western nations for not providing enough money to help undeveloped countries mitigate the damages caused by climate change.

Current CO2 emissions by country. So now you know who’s to blame! (Credit: 8 Billion Trees)

Things at the conference got so bad that on the meetings last day delegates from many of the countries facing the most severe harm stormed out of the negotiating room in protest. Environmental activists began chanting ‘No deal is better than a bad deal’ and journalists reporting on the conference announced that COP29 could end with no deal being reached. Cooler heads did prevail however as the conference was extended by two days in order for a deal to be reached.

There were certainly fewer smiles at COP29 than there were at the Paris conference. (Credit: CNN)

It’s not much of a deal however, developed nations have pledged $300 billion a year to enable undeveloped nations to both cope with the damages caused by climate change while at the same time cut their growing CO2 emissions. That amount however is less than a quarter of the minimum estimated $1.3 trillion a year required, and much of that money is in the form of loans that most underdeveloped nations would find hard to repay. More than that, the world’s two biggest polluters, China and India, aren’t required to provide any funds at all, or reduce their own emissions.     And remember, the original Paris agreement back in 2015 the developed world promised $100 billion per year to help fight climate but precious little of that money ever actually became available.

The promises made by the world’s richest countries haven’t been enough, and precious little of that money has actually been delivered. So, is it any wonder that the little countries, who just happen to be the countries suffering the most from climate change, are feeling abandoned! (Credit: France 24)

With the election of Trump and the almost certain possibility that the US will once again leave the original Paris agreement the whole idea of the world coming together to fight climate change must be considered to be in doubt. Even as the danger of global warming becomes more obvious every year the human race seems to become more determined to do nothing to protect itself.

When the environment collapses and the very survival of the human race becomes doubtful it will be our own fault. (Credit: bgfay)

P.S. More bad news. Even as I was preparing this post for publication a second UN conference on the environment was taking place in the city of Busan in South Korea. The talks, officially known as INC-5 were intended to deal with the ever-growing problem of plastic pollution worldwide.

Another meeting of the world’s politicians to solve an environmental problem. Why am I getting a feeling of Deja Vu! (Credit: YouTube)

Every year the human race produces 450 million metric tonnes of plastic, 350 million of which is single use plastic that simply ends up being tossed into the environment causing what has become a planet wide blight. Worse still, while plastic does not decay chemically in the environment it does break down mechanically into smaller and smaller pieces, microplastic and nanoplastic particles that are now literally everywhere, land, sea and air. They’re in our water; our food and now they have been detected in our blood and yes, even in our brains.

Is a caption even necessary? (Credit: World Ocean Day)

So the need for an international agreement to reduce the amount of plastic in the world has become as great as the need for an agreement to reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, and every bit as hard to reach. Of the more than 170 countries and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) that attended the meeting the vast majority favoured mandatory cutbacks in plastic production.

With so many ‘experts’ it’s hard to understand how they failed to accomplish anything! (Credit: Instagram)

A small minority made up of plastic producing nations disagreed. In their opinion the solution to the problem is recycling and better waste management. Solutions that have been tried continuously for the last fifty years with little success, less than 10% of plastic is ever recycled.

Despite the best efforts of many good people there was no agreement at INC-5. (Credit: X.com)

By the end of the week long conference the two sides were as far apart as ever and the conference closed without any agreement. So in the short space of a month the nations of the world had gathered together in two conferences to try to save our planet, with little or nothing to show for all the effort.

Space News for November 2024. 

The last time I discussed the latest events taking place in humanity’s exploration of space, see my post of 31 August 2024, NASA had made the decision that the Boeing Starliner capsule would be brought back to Earth from the International Space Station (ISS) unmanned and that Starliner’s crew of Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore would remain aboard the ISS until February when they would return aboard Space X’s crew 9 capsule.

The Starliner capsule managed to deliver its crew of two astronauts to the International Space Station but its continuing problems forced NASA to bring it back to Earth unmanned while its crew have to wait to return to Earth next February. (Credit: Texas A&M Today – Texas A&M University)

The empty Starliner capsule succeeded in landing on the 7th of September in New Mexico marking the first time that a man-capable US space capsule has ever landed on solid land rather than in the water. The voyage home from the ISS also marked the first issue-free space operation that Starliner has ever completed. Even though the Starliner astronauts Williams and Wilmore would have been safe in returning on Starliner NASA is convinced that they made the safe choice given all of the problems the Boeing space craft had seen during its mission.

In the end Starliner did land safely but with all of the problems it’s had for years the question is, will it ever begin regular service? (Credit: NASA)

The second part of NASA’s rescue plan followed shortly thereafter when on the 27th of September a Space X Dragon capsule was launched into orbit. This mission, designated as Crew 9 was originally intended to carry four astronauts to the ISS for a regular six-month tour of duty. Now that the mission had been changed to include the rescue of the Starliner crew however only two astronauts, NASA’s Nick Hague along with Russia’s Alexander Gorbunov rode the Falcon 9 rocket into space.

Launch of the Space X Crew 9 mission to the ISS. Originally this flight was expected to carry four astronauts. In order to bring back the Starliner crew however the mission took off with only two astronauts aboard. (Credit: Orlando Sentinel)

Once Crew 9 successfully reached the ISS the Crew 8 astronauts, who were originally scheduled to return to Earth back in August, were relieved and could return home. However, the weather around Florida has been so terrible, two hurricanes along with just a lot of more normal bad weather, that Crew 8 were unable to return to Earth until the early morning hours of the 25th of October, adding an extra two months to the crew’s planned six month tour aboard the ISS.

After an extended stay on the ISS the Space X Crew 8 capsule and crew returned to Earth. However, one crew member showed signs of some medical problems, NASA is being very tight lipped about what problems, and so the entire crew spent their first night back in hospital. They all appear to be fine now! (Credit: YouTube)

All told the problems caused by Starliner’s malfunctions have caused Williams and Wilmore to spend eight months in orbit instead of their planned one week. The Crew 8 astronauts spent an two extra months aboard the ISS while the two astronauts originally assigned to the Crew 9 mission will have to wait for another mission before they get to go to the ISS. The fact that NASA has handled all of these mix-ups and schedule rearrangements so well is a tribute to the space agency’s expertise and the way that travel to and from Low Earth Orbit (LOE) has become routine.

Along with routine crew rotations, supplies aboard the ISS are being constantly maintained by unmanned cargo spacecraft like this Cygnus capsule. (Credit: Wikipedia)

Because of Starliner’s problems NASA has also decided that the Boeing spacecraft will not be used for either of the scheduled ISS crew missions in 2025. Space X’s Dragon will now conduct both the Crew 10 mission in February of 2025 and the Crew 11 mission in July. NASA is still in the process of studying Starliner’s performance and will decide if another Crew Flight Test is needed before the capsule is cleared for regular duty.

Not the kind of headlines that an agency like NASA wants to make. NASA is almost certainly going to want a thorough analysis of Starliner’s problems and at least another Crew Fight Test before clearing Starliner for regular duty. How long that will take, and remember the ISS is going to be de-orbited in 2030, is anybody’s guess! (Credit: The Autopian)

Even as the whole drama of how to bring the Starliner astronauts back to Earth was playing out Space X succeeded in completing another private space mission. The Polaris Dawn mission was funded and commanded by billionaire Jared Isaacman who also paid for Space X’s first private space mission, designated as Inspiration 4, back in September of 2021.

Launch of the Polaris dawn private space mission. (Credit: CNN)

That first trip into space for Isaacman was just four days in LOE enjoying zero gravity without trying to do anything too dangerous. The Polaris Dawn mission however was more daring with the Dragon capsule reaching a higher altitude in space than any human had gone since the days of Apollo’s flights to the Moon. At the planned height of about 1,400 kilometers the Polaris Dawn astronauts were well within the Van Allen radiation belts, not a good place to stay.

Jared Isaacman performing the first ever private spacewalk. In addition to this feat the Polaris Dawn mission also took human beings further from our planet than anyone has gone since the days of Apollo. (Credit: NASASpaceflight.com)

Later on in the mission Isaacman along with Space X engineer Sarah Gillis succeeded in carrying out the first ever private spacewalk when the Dragon’s crew compartment was depressurized and the docking hatch was opened while all four crewpersons were wearing their spacesuits. Once Isaacman and Gillis had taken turns stepping outside of the hatch it was closed and the cabin repressurized. With the success of this space walk Space X has gained yet another space capability, another feather in their cap.

Once the term ‘Feather in your Cap’ literally signified the number of enemies you had killed in battle. Today however it has the less violent meaning of a successful achievement or acquiring a new skill. (Credit: Edward S. Curtis)

Then, on October 13th Space X took an even bigger step forward with the fifth test launch of their huge Starship launch system, the largest, most powerful rocket ever built. With each test flight the 122 meter tall Starship has made significant progress. In the forth test flight for example the booster stage succeeded in coming down at the exact intended place off the coast of Texas, although no attempt was made to recover it. Meanwhile for the first time the second stage reached orbital velocity although it then broke up upon trying to reenter the atmosphere.

The fifth test launch of Space X’s massive Starship rocket, the most powerful launch system ever built. (Credit: CNN)

For the fifth test the plans were even more ambitious with an attempt to catch the first stage booster in a pair of mechanical arms that have been christened ‘chopsticks’. For the second stage an attempt at a controlled reentry was made at a designated point in the Indian Ocean, although again no attempt was made to recover the second stage this time. The sight of the massive booster stage returning to its launch pad, stabilizing itself in space and then being grabbed by those chopsticks was something I’d never expected to see and certainly ushers in a new era of space flight. Think about it, if a rocket that large can be reused the possibility now exists of launching huge amounts of equipment into LOE where it can be used to build large space stations and spaceships for going to the Moon or beyond. The next test flight for Starship is already being prepared and this time Space X will attempt to recover both stages.

The first stage of Starship being captured by the same launch tower it had taken off from just minutes before. The reusability of Starship is a key to being able to reduce the cost spaceflight in general. This was an astonishing achievement. (Credit: CNBC)

I guess that’s all we have time for in this post, not that there hasn’t been a lot of other space news. Several robotic probes have been in the news as well but their stories will have to wait for my next post. So stay tuned.